Page 512
The fall of the first man, wherein nature was made good, and cannot be repaired but by the maker. CHAP. 11.
BVt God, foreknowing althings, could not but know that man would fall: there∣fore wee must ground our City vpon his prescience and ordinance, not vpon that which we know not, and God hath vnreuealed For mans sinne, could not dis∣turbe Gods decree, nor force him to change his resolue: God fore-knew and preuented both, that is, how bad man (whome hee had made) should become and what good hee meant to deriue from him, for all his badnesse. For though God bee said to change his res•…•… (as the scriptures (a) tropically say that hee repented, &c.) Yet this is in respect of mans hope, or natures order, not ac∣cording to his own prescience. So then God made man, vpright, and consequently well-willed: otherwise he could not haue beene vpright. So that this good will, was Gods worke, man being there-with created. But the euill will, which was in man before his euill worke, was rather a fayling from the worke of God to the owne workes, then any worke at all. And therefore were the workes euill, because they were according to them-selues, and not to God, this euill will be∣ing as a tree bearing such bad fruite, or man himselfe, in respect of his euill will. Now this euill will, though it do not follow, but oppose nature, being a falt: yet is it of the same nature that vice is, which cannot but bee in some nature: but it must bee in that nature which God made of nothing, not in that which he begot of himselfe, as his word is, whereby althings were made: for although God made man of dust, yet hee made dust of nothing, and hee made the soule of no∣thing, which he ioyned with the body, making full man. But euills are so farre vnder that which is good, that though they be permitted to bee for to shew what good vse Gods prouident iustice can make of them, yet may that which is good, consist without them, as that true and glorious God him selfe, and all the visible resplendent heauens do, aboue this darkned & misty aire of ours: but euills cannot consist but in that which is good, for all the natures wherein they abide being considered as meere natures, are good. And euill is drawne from nature, not by abscission of any nature contrary to this or any part of this, but by purifiying of that onely, which was thus depraued. Then (b) therefore is the will truely free, when it serueth neither vice nor sin. Such God gaue vs, such we lost, and can∣not recouer but by him that gaue it: as the truth saith: If the sonne free you, you shalbe truly freed, it is all one as if hee should say: If the sonne saue you, you shalbe truely sa∣ued, (c) for hee is the freer, that is the Sauiour. Wherefore (d) in Paradise both locall, and spirituall man made God his rule to liue by, for it was not a Paradise locall, for the bodies good, and not spirituall for the spirits: nor was it a spiritu∣all 〈◊〉〈◊〉 the spirits good, and no locall one for the bodies: Noe, it was both for both. But after that (e) that proud, and therefore enuious Angell, falling through that pride from God vnto him-selfe, and choosing in a tiranicall vain glory ra∣•…•…r to rule then to be ruled, fell from the spirituall paradise, (of whose fall, and 〈◊〉〈◊〉 fellowes, that therevpon of good Angells became his, I disputed in my ninth booke 〈◊〉〈◊〉 God gaue grace and meanes) hee desiring to creepe into mans minde by his ill-perswading suttlely, and enuying mans constancy in his owne fall chose the serpent, one of the creatures that as then liued hurtlesse with the man