the study of wysedome, comprehended in the bokes of wyse men, who of Pythagoras were callid Philosophi, whiche dothe signify the louers of wysedome. Wher∣fore they which eyther by diuine inspiration, or by stu∣dy of the warkes of excellent wise men, haue the truest knowlege of Iustyce, and haue best vnderstandynge what is iuste, and what is vniust, and consequentely can prouide remedies accordyng to iustyce: which re∣medies if they ones be made vniuersal, they be lawes, howe so euer they be pronounced, be it by a multitude or by one persone, as the edict not onely of the empe∣rour, but also of hym that is Pretor, is a lawe, as wel as that which is made by al the hole senate, or inacted by the Tribunes and people of Rome.
¶And where ye saye that phylosophers were neuer good practysers in a weale publyke, nor yet good men of warre, yf ye doo meane by practyse, that detestable exercyse, whyche is subtyll deceyuyng, crafty entermi∣nyng, mayntenance of iniustice, peruerse counsailyng and vnmeasurable gettynge, I confirme than youre sayinge. for a phylosopher abhorreth suche practyse, and as moche as he may doth and perswadeth the con¦trary. But if ye do intende by that word practyse, only the laudable exercise in thadmynystration of a weale publyke, truely ye be in a great errour and folye, and do speake as if ye were one of the vulgar people igno∣rant of letters, ye and that more is, priuate displesure hath caused you to forget what ye your self hath sene, contrary to that whiche nowe ye haue spoken. I wylle not reherse all them, whiche beinge studious in philo∣sophy haue gouerned publyke weales, or haue execu∣ted their ministration therin substancially: but some