QVEST. XV. Concerning the vse of the Spleene against the slanderous ca∣lumniations of Galens Aduersaries.
THere be diuers opinions as well of the Ancient as Moderne writers about the vse of the Spleene, Erasistratus thought it not of any great moment. Aristo∣tle in his third Booke de partibus Animalium, confesseth it to be necessary in∣deede, yet not absolutely, but by euent, although hee sayth it sometime draw∣eth the excrement from the stomacke, and worketh it vnto his nourishment. Both these opinions haue beene hissed out of the Schooles of Physitians, as being neither established by reason, nor agreeing with the maiesty, wisedom, and policy of Nature, who vseth not to create any thing in the frame of our bodies, which is not necessary for the bet∣ter gouernment and order of the common-wealth of the same. Alexander Aphrodisaeus sect. 2. problem, and Aretaeus lib 1. de causis & signis chronicorum, and the author of the Book de Re∣spiratione do conclude, that the spleene is the organ of sanguification, and they call it the bastard Liuer. In this say they is the veinall blood prepared and concocted, yet doth their beleefe rest vpon coniecture, because the frame and structure of both the bowels is alike; because in both of them there are large and ample vessels; because nature vseth to make the common ministers or seruiceable partes of the bodie, either double, or if but single then that one is placed in the middest, as the heart, the stomacke, the wombe, the bladder, the mouth, the tongue, and the nose; because the Liuer is in the right side and the Spleene in the left, they seeme to bee two organes ordained for one and the same action. But these bare coniectures are too weak to make a party that should hope to preuaile against a com∣mon receiued opinion. For how could nature haue set two so ample bowels which were to serue the whole bodie in the midst vnder the heart, and how again should she not haue bin idle if she had made more instruments then one for sanguificatiō, when one was sufficient? Rondeletius was of opinion that the Spleen is not the receptacle of the melancholy humor, because that humour remaining in his naturall integrity, is spent vpon the bones & other hard and dry parts of the body, and because there is lest of that humor in vs, there is no part appointed to receiue the superfluities thereof, like as there is no place ordained to receiue the recrements of the blood, which for the most part do passe away by sweats and insensi∣ble transpiration. Bauhin runneth a middle course between these whose arguments we haue heard before in the history, & may receiue answer partly by himselfe, partly by the answere to others. Vlmus a Physitian of Poytiers in France, in an elegant and wittie Booke which hee set out of the Spleene, hath deuised a newe and vncouth vse thereof, that is, That in the Spleene the Vitall spirite is prepared: hee meaneth that the thinnest part of the Bloode, which is the matter of the Vitall spirite, passeth from the Spleene thorough