Mikrokosmographia a description of the body of man. Together vvith the controuersies thereto belonging. Collected and translated out of all the best authors of anatomy, especially out of Gasper Bauhinus and Andreas Laurentius. By Helkiah Crooke Doctor of Physicke, physitian to His Maiestie, and his Highnesse professor in anatomy and chyrurgerie. Published by the Kings Maiesties especiall direction and warrant according to the first integrity, as it was originally written by the author.

About this Item

Title
Mikrokosmographia a description of the body of man. Together vvith the controuersies thereto belonging. Collected and translated out of all the best authors of anatomy, especially out of Gasper Bauhinus and Andreas Laurentius. By Helkiah Crooke Doctor of Physicke, physitian to His Maiestie, and his Highnesse professor in anatomy and chyrurgerie. Published by the Kings Maiesties especiall direction and warrant according to the first integrity, as it was originally written by the author.
Author
Crooke, Helkiah, 1576-1635.
Publication
[London] :: Printed by William Iaggard dwelling in Barbican, and are there to be sold,
1615.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Human anatomy -- Early works to 1800.
Cite this Item
"Mikrokosmographia a description of the body of man. Together vvith the controuersies thereto belonging. Collected and translated out of all the best authors of anatomy, especially out of Gasper Bauhinus and Andreas Laurentius. By Helkiah Crooke Doctor of Physicke, physitian to His Maiestie, and his Highnesse professor in anatomy and chyrurgerie. Published by the Kings Maiesties especiall direction and warrant according to the first integrity, as it was originally written by the author." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A19628.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 1, 2024.

Pages

QVEST. LX. Of the number and order of Sapors.

ARistotle in the 4. chapter of his book de sensu & sensili going about to recite the diuers kinds of Tasts compareth them with colours not because there is any great affinty betwixt them, but because there is iust as many of the one kinde as of the other, and he concludeth them both vnder the number of se∣uen. Some say there are eight kindes of Sapours, and Plinie in the 21. chap∣ter of his 15. booke, reckons vp thirteene. VVe with Aristotle will rather reduce them vnto the number of seauen; because, as there may be, and indeede there are infinite varieties of mixtion, so we should draw out of them infinite differences of Sapors, if it were possible accurately to number them; for nothing is so sure as that the differences of Sapors doe a∣rise from the multiplicity of mixtion; for example, out of that wherein heate and moysture are aboundant, a sweete Sapour; out of that that is hote and dry, a bitter and salt Sapor, and so in the rest, as this or that qualitie hath greater or lesse rule in the mixt body, yet alwayes moysture must haue the first place.

An instance of this we haue in a place of Galen, in the sixth, seuenth and eight chap∣ters of his fourth booke de simplicium medicamentorum facultatibus. The fruites of trees (saith hee) that appeare to vs to be sweete when they be ripe, are soure when they are young, and any of consistence, but in processe of time they become moyst, and their sowrnes turnes into sharpe∣nesse, which sharpenesse they loose by degrees as they grow ripe and at length become sweete.

Among these Sapors, Salt and Bitter are contrary to sweete, because being vnder the same kind there is the greatest distance betwixt them. Aristotle hauing a respect to white & blacke calleth them priuatiues, and that not without good cause, for although beeing vnder

Page 720

the same kinde they differ most one from another, yet they cannot bee truely sayde to bee contraryes: for sweetnesse is generated in a subiect that is fulfilled with heate and moi∣sture, but salt and bitter are in a subiect which is hot yet very dry, and therefore the sweete Sapor nourisheth more then the rest, yea we thinke that all other Sapors doe nourish one∣ly by reason of their sweetnesse which lurketh in the secret bowels of the sapide body, al∣though by the Tast it cannot be so manifestly perceiued. For all nourishment must bee conuerted into bloode that so it may become a fit nourishment vnto parts, but laudable and good blood is hot and moyst and sweete to Taste to. That Sapor therefore vvhich hath the greatest Analogy and affinity with bloode is fittest to nourish, and such is the sweete Taste.

Other Sapors which haue no sweetnesse at al in them are altogether vnfit for nourish∣ment.

There are some which thinke that sweete and bitter are not the extreme Sapors; groun∣ding themselues vpon Plato in Timaeo, because (say they) those Sapors are to bee accoun∣ted extreames which come neerest vnto the first qualities. But neyther sweete nor bitter are such, but Styptick or binding and keene, for the keene taste or byting, such as is in Pep∣per resulteth out of a high degree of heate. The other which bindeth and contracteth the Tongue ariseth from extreme cold.

Againe, those obiects that are extreme do hurt and offend the instrument; now sweet doth not hurt but refresheth it, yea it conserueth the temper thereof by an acceptable pleasure and delight. Another Reason may bee, why sweete is not an extreme Taste, be∣cause from sowre to keene the passage is by sweete. So that whatsoeuer is keene or biting when it is ripe, and sowre when it is greene, will haue a kinde of sweetenesse in it before it come to his perfection. Now in qualities the transition is by the mediate or meane quali∣ties not by the extreame. It is therefore to bee concluded, that not sweete and bitter but sowre and keene are the extreame Sapors.

But although we must needs confesse that these Arguments haue some life & strength in them, yet we presume that Aristotles opinion may well bee maintained. It is true in∣deede, that if you consider Sapors according to their originall, that is, as they result out of the first qualities our aduersaries haue concluded well. But if you regard Sapor with∣out respect vnto their originall and simply as they are Sapours, that is, naked qualities which mooue the Taste, then our Aduersaries are in the wrong.

It may well be, that Plato vnderstood the matter on this manner, because he doth espe∣cially attend to the temper of the body in which the Sapors are, but this is not the pro∣per contemplation of Sapours. Aristotle who of purpose disputed concerning Sapours vnderstood them according to their proper Nature, to wit, as they mooue the Taste for a sweete and a bitter Sapor do mooue and affect the Sense after the most contrary man∣ner. So colours are not to be considered as they are nearer or further off, too or from the first qualities, but as they affect the Sight, and in this respect white and blacke are cal∣led extreame and contrary colours, because they affect the sight after a most contrarie manner, for white dissipateth the Sight. Black congregateth and vniteth it.

VVhereas they say that the keene and Stipticke Sapors do hurt the organ they are de∣ceiued if they meane it in respect that they are Sapours; for the truth is, that the Offence commeth from the first qualities, to which those Tastes are too neere Neighbours. And this is the reason also why the passage is from sowre to keen by sweet, because those quali∣ties are so changed in the mixt bodie, that after sweete, sowre doth succeed, & after sowre keene or hot. Their consequence would follow, if the sowre Tast should engender sweet, and sweete should engender that that is keene and hot, but there is no such matter: for who did euer say that the second qualities did arise one out of another? For they proceed not so much from their first qualities as from the condition of the matter. VVe conclude therefore, that because the sweete and bitter Tastes as they are Tastes or Sapors do after a most contrary manner affect the Sense of Tasting, that therefore these are the extreame Sapors.

Hauing thus resolued which Sapors are extreame, let vs now a little consider what are the intermediate, which with Aristotle we reckon six, Fatt, Salt, Keene, Sowre, Sharpe and Tart, which in Latine are called Pinguis, Salsus, Acris, Acerbus, Acutus & Acidus.

I list not to oppose Pliny or any man else that hath bene pleased to make more differen∣ces of Sapors, these are those that are most manifest, and therefore Aristotle contented

Page 721

himselfe with them, the rest being very obscure or at least not knowne to such as this our labour shall concerne. Thus much onely we will admonish you of, that all the varietie of Tasts beside those we haue accoūted, do arise from the innumerable variety of mixtions, from the different constitutions of the orgā, as also from some secret & vnknown instincts which do recide in particular bodies, whereof to say truth we can giue no reason at all.

VVherefore because the Sapours themselues are infinite, their proportion very diuers, and their causes so transcendent, it is not possible to make any definition or description of them to any purpose, who can deny but that some creatures, yea some men doe vehe∣mently desire bitter things and abhorte that which is sweete? are bitter things therefore sweete to the one and sweet things bitter to the other? You will say no, because the diffe∣rence ariseth from the diuersity of his Temperament that Tastes it. I confesse it, but see∣ing there are almost so many diuers Temperaments as there are indiudidua or particular creatures in the world. I would aske the question whether it bee possible that so many different kinds of Sapours may be reckoned or deduced from them? By no meanes: no more is it possible to define them.

VVherefore if you looke into the vulgar discriptions of Sapours you shall finde them full of errours. That (say they) is sweete that doth affect the Sense best, that is bitter which affects it worst.

Neither is true for if that which is bitter did affect the Sense worst, no man would de∣sire it, no man woulde take pleasure in it; for that which peruerteth the harmony of the Sense, can in that respect atleast bee pleasaunt vnto him, but that which doeth affect the Sense woorste must needes make the instrument to iarre, and yet wee knowe that many men (not to speake of other creatures) do wonderfully delight and vehemently long after those things which are bitter.

Againe, if sweete were that which affecteth the Sense best, then should it please all men, yea all creatures, for that which affecteth the Sense best wee should most reioyce in, which notwithstanding we finde to be contrary often times in our selues, when nothing is more irke some vnto vs then that which is sweete and lushious.

But some men may aske me if I do not like these definitions, how I would haue sweet and bitter defined. I answere as I a sayd before that they cannot bee defined; for acci∣dents doe not fall vnder definition, especially second qualities which are more accidenta∣ry then the first: and therefore I thinke they cannot bee so much as described, vnlesse you will take that for a description which is most common, and when there happeneth any ex∣ception it shall be sayde (and that more truely then they are aware) that it happens by ac∣cident, that is to say, not because the Taste doth not agree with a discription, but because there is some Salt in the Organ which doth not perceiue the Sapour as it is.

Well, wee will confesse that these Sapors being the extreames, may fall vnder some such rude discription as is before exhibited; but whose pensill can drawe so fine a line as to describe the intermediate Tastes? Shall wee make one for all, and say that those are in∣termediate Sapors which affect the Taste after a middle mannner?

Surely this definition had not neede to bee scanned in the Schooles, being made at random or at large without any causes or signes of causes therein.

Much better it is in my opinion to note them out by examples or instances, as Galen hath wisely done in the eight and ninth Chapters of his fourth Booke de simpto. medicam. facult. A sweet Sapour therefore doeth consist in a matter aboundantly moyst and mo∣deratly hotte: as are Figges, Hony, ripe Grapes, sweete and mellow Apples and such like. The bitter Sapour recideth in a very crasse and thick matter; hot indeed but easily moyst, yea rather dry as VVormwood, Gall, Aloes and such like. A fat Sapor consisteth in a thin matter and ayrie, which also is temperate in the first qualities as in Seame, Marrow, Oyle, ••••••ke, Butter & such like. A salt Sapor consisteth in a dry matter, as in Salt, Ashes, Gun∣powder and the like. A keene Sapour is in a substance whose parts are thin and subtle, yet moyst and the temper hot; such a tast in Garlick, Onions, Raddish and the like. A sowre ••••st which also they cal stipticke and Sapor pontieus, but I knowe not why, is in a crasse and cold matter, as in vnripe Apples & Berries or such like. An acute or byting Sapor is when he parts are thin, dry and hot, as Pepper and Ginger. The sharpe is in thin parts but cold, •••• in Vineger, Lemons, oyle of Vitreall and such like. Finally, you may with me obserue that no man for ought I know hath hitherto sufficiently described these maister Sapours, ay not so much as giuen them apt and fit names.

Page 722

The confusion, whereof do make the discourse of them tedious to the Reader. Onely Galen hath chalked out a faire way, wherein if we carefully insist, haply this labyrinth may at length be troden out. VVe conclude therefore, that if it be impossible rightlie to de∣fine these heads, hard to describe them, very difficult to giue them proper names; what an infinite taske were it to vndertake an exact discourse concerning all the particular dif∣ferences of Sapors?

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.