Vigilius dormitans Romes seer overseene· Or A treatise of the Fift General Councell held at Constantinople, anno 553. under Iustinian the Emperour, in the time of Pope Vigilius: the occasion being those tria capitula, which for many yeares troubled the whole Church. Wherein is proved that the Popes apostolicall constitution and definitive sentence in matter of faith, was condemned as hereticall by the Synod. And the exceeding frauds of Cardinall Baronius and Binius are clearely discovered. By Rich: Crakanthorp Dr. in Divinitie, and chapleine in ordinary to his late Majestie King Iames. Opus posthumum. Published and set forth by his brother Geo: Crakanthorp, according to a perfect copy found written under the authors owne hand.

E.

• EPistle of Ibas wholly hereticall, p. 19. sect. 8.9. and p. 24. sect. 19.
• Eunomius approved not any part of this E∣pistle, p. 20. sect. 11.
• Eunomius approved the confession of Ibas, p. 21. sect. 14.
• The Epistle of Ibas not approved at Chal∣cedon, p. 107. sect. 2, 3, 4, &c.
• The Epistle was truly the writing of Ibas, p. 109. sect. 5, 6.
• At Ephesus a great rent and division between Iohn and Cyrill, ibid.
• At Ephesus Cyrill was deposed by the Con∣venticle, ibid. sect. 3.
• The Emperour ignorant for a time of the di∣vision betweene Iohn and Cyrill, p. 15. sect. 4.
• The Emperour had knowledge of the divi∣sion by a letter brought into the Court by •• beggar, ibid.
• ...

• Eustathius full of forgeries, p. 340. sect. 24, 25, &c.
• Eutychius not banished for not consenting to the heresie of the Phantastickes, p. 341. sect. 25.
• Eutychius given to divination, hereticall, and what it was, p. 343. sect. 28, 29. for these supposed to be banished, ibid.
• Evagrius full of fables, p. 345. sect. 30. &c.
• The Emperours Edict reviled by Baronius, p. 363. sect. 1. it was not repugnant to the or∣thodoxall faith, it was no seminary of sedition, ibid. sect. 3, 4.
• The Epistle of Ibas condemned by the Coun∣cell at Chalcedon, p. 381. sect. 1. the Epistle in Cedrenus not Iustinians, p. 398. sect. 1.
• Epistles writ to Dioscorus and Leo were for∣ged, and not Theodorets, p. 417. sect. 7, 8. and p. 444. sect. 8.
• Epistles by their erroneous inscription are not proved to be forged, p. 429. sect. 9, 10. &c.
• Epiphanius his writing against images read in the second Nicene Synod, and by them re∣jected. p. 109. sect. 7. the booke was the booke of Epiphanius, p. 112. sect. 12.
• The explanation meant by Ibas was a con∣demning of the twelve chapters of Cyrill, pa. 159. sect. 42, 43. a condemning of the faith, p. 160. sect. 44. the like explanation meant by Vigilius, p. 166. sect. 52.