The Bishop of Gallovvay his dikaiologie contayning a iust defence of his former apologie. Against the iniust imputations of Mr. Dauid Hume.
About this Item
Title
The Bishop of Gallovvay his dikaiologie contayning a iust defence of his former apologie. Against the iniust imputations of Mr. Dauid Hume.
Author
Cowper, William, 1568-1619.
Publication
London :: Printed by Thomas Snodham for Iohn Budge, and are to be sould at the great south-dore of Paules, and at Brittaines-Bursse,
1614.
Rights/Permissions
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
Subject terms
Hume, David, 1560?-1630?
Cowper, William, 1568-1619. -- Bishop of Galloway his apologie -- Early works to 1800.
Episcopacy -- Early works to 1800.
Cite this Item
"The Bishop of Gallovvay his dikaiologie contayning a iust defence of his former apologie. Against the iniust imputations of Mr. Dauid Hume." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A19489.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 2, 2024.
Pages
THE ANSVVERE.
NOw at length M. Dauid, the euill blood begins to [ 130]
fall from your heart, God be thanked, and you
are come to some coolnes, suppose not kindly enough,
yet of your former Feauer wherein you raged, yet it
puts vs in hope, you may recouer of this disease be∣time,
what you haue here said, I receiue ••buijs vlnis, any
light I haue I will willingly communicate, bitternesse
•• agree be remoued; Perit enim iudicium, vbires transit
in affectum: I wish therefore perturbate and preiudicat
affection may be laid by: It is onely these two 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, that fights against Episcopall go∣uernement.
To be short, I embrace all your conclusi∣on,
and euery condition of it, except onely where you
will me, not to disguise my speech by sought out sentences▪
and o••tentation of reading, to iuggle the iudgement of the sim∣ple,
I must warne you, that whether your word stand
for a i••gulator, or a deceiuing Iugler, your deede comes
descriptionPage 126
too soone▪ against your protestation, euen now you
craued bitternesse may be remoued, and you cannot
leaue it, but to vse your owne Prouerbe, A Wolfe will be
a Wolfe. Naturam expellas furcalicet vs{que} recurret; And
as to my manner of writing, I cannot change it: I want
not my owne reasons, neither haue you any cause to
complaine of it. Now we goe to the question.