Page 24
Mr Hugh Broughton his other vvritings against Mr Henry Ainsvvorth aforesaid. Articles of vnlernedship obiected to Mr. Ainsworth: shewing that he doth not well to take vpon him a Doctorship.
And first from Aharons attire: afterwards for all Exod. & Ebrew and Greek studies: shewing that he should do better to learne yet 20. yeares, then beeing blind to lead the blind into ditches.
M. Ainsworth was accused that he sayd the Ephod had blew silk, scarlet and crimson, & white silk: where in trueth the coloured was woollen threed: and the white was linen: by the vniversall consent of the Ebrewes who had 1400. yeres open sight and vse of these matters: and in all theyr re∣cordes are vniforme for the matter. Also the best Rabbins of Christians vpon the great Plantine Bible in many places might have forced him to have perceived his blindnes.
In steed of humilitie he bableth most senseles through a sheet of pa∣per almost all neer written to match the leaves of a forrest in grosse er∣rours by talke: turning Dictionaries, and disputing most senselesly: and after warning, in replie, he thus speaketh.
1. He thinketh that white silk & white linen is all one. So blew silk &c. and blew linen: and he maketh no conscience in having deceived his hearers: & careth not for the Law of leaving open a well into which the vnheedy may fall.
2. Because in private garments, Levit. 19. diuerse stuff is forbidden, he dreameth Aharons Ephod had not diverse stuffe. And will beleve the Scripture rather then all Iewes consent: as though the Scripture expounded the tongue: the Old T. the Heb. and the New T. the Greke.
3. He might as well say Aharons Ephod had no golden thred; because Levit. 19. diverse stuff in garments is forbidden.
4. For an Hebrew word, Mr Ainsworth dare take against all 〈◊〉〈◊〉▪ None of wit will thinke him wise.
5. For a Iewes Law, & open storie, he preferreth hi•• 〈…〉〈…〉 all Iewes that ever handled Moses.