The cities aduocate in this case or question of honor and armes; whether apprentiship extinguisheth gentry? Containing a cleare refutation of the pernicious common errour affirming it, swallowed by Erasmus of Roterdam, Sir Thomas Smith in his common-weale, Sir Iohn Fern in his blazon, Raphe Broke Yorke Herald, and others. With the copies of transcripts of three letters which gaue occasion of this worke.
About this Item
Title
The cities aduocate in this case or question of honor and armes; whether apprentiship extinguisheth gentry? Containing a cleare refutation of the pernicious common errour affirming it, swallowed by Erasmus of Roterdam, Sir Thomas Smith in his common-weale, Sir Iohn Fern in his blazon, Raphe Broke Yorke Herald, and others. With the copies of transcripts of three letters which gaue occasion of this worke.
Author
Bolton, Edmund, 1575?-1633?
Publication
London :: Printed [by Miles Flesher] for William Lee, at the signe of the Turkes Head next to the Miter and Phœnix in Fleet-street,
1629.
Rights/Permissions
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
Subject terms
Apprentices -- England -- Early works to 1800.
England -- Social conditions -- 17th century -- Early works to 1800.
Cite this Item
"The cities aduocate in this case or question of honor and armes; whether apprentiship extinguisheth gentry? Containing a cleare refutation of the pernicious common errour affirming it, swallowed by Erasmus of Roterdam, Sir Thomas Smith in his common-weale, Sir Iohn Fern in his blazon, Raphe Broke Yorke Herald, and others. With the copies of transcripts of three letters which gaue occasion of this worke." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A16306.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed April 30, 2024.
Pages
The Contents of this first part.
1 THe present question very important for many great cau∣ses.
Two Crowned Queenes of England, & much of the
Nobility parties to it. Bullen & Calthorpe L. Majors of
London; their interesses in royall blood. What Quaestio
status, and what the least capitis diminutio is. Only the
base neglect it. Honour a faire Starre. Disparagement
odious. Preuention of mischiefes by determining this
question. Proud Citie-races vnworthy of the Citie.
2 The Cities Honors in Armes proued out of ancient Monu∣ments.
The L. Fitz Walter, Standard-bearer of London.
Claurie and Biallie two termes in old blazon.
3 The transcendent power of opinion. To derogate from the
splendor of birth, reputed a wrong. Whence comes the pre∣sent
question of Apprentiship.
...
descriptionPage 2
4 The maine reason why some doe hold, that Apprentiship
extinguisheth Gentrie. Apprentiship no bondage ei∣ther
in truth, or at all. The case truely propounded. The
skill of honest gettings a precious mystery. What kinde of
contract that seemes to be, which is betweene Master and
Apprentise.
5 An obiection that Apprentiship is a kinde of bondage.
The fine folly of Erasmus in his Etymologie of an Appren∣tise.
The comparison betweene Seruus among Ciuilians,
and Apprentises among Englishmen, holds not. What
the word Apprentise meanes. Sir Thomas Smiths error
in confounding seruitude and discipline.
6. 7. 8. Particular points touching Seruus. Sanctuarie at
the Princes image. Manumission, and Recaptiuitie by
Law. None of those points concerne Apprentises more
then Souldiers, Schollers, or religious nouices.
9. 10. The finall cause denominates the action, and proues
Apprentiship not to be base. The contrarie opinion perni∣cious
to manners, and to good Commonweale among vs,
chiefly now. The different face of both opinions in daily
experience.
email
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem?
Please contact us.