The arte of logick Plainely taught in the English tongue, according to the best approued authors. Very necessary for all students in any profession, how to defend any argument against all subtill sophisters, and cauelling schismatikes, and how to confute their false syllogismes, and captious arguments. By M. Blundevile.

About this Item

Title
The arte of logick Plainely taught in the English tongue, according to the best approued authors. Very necessary for all students in any profession, how to defend any argument against all subtill sophisters, and cauelling schismatikes, and how to confute their false syllogismes, and captious arguments. By M. Blundevile.
Author
Blundeville, Thomas, fl. 1561.
Publication
London :: Printed by William Stansby, and are to be sold by Matthew Lownes,
1617.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Logic -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A16218.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The arte of logick Plainely taught in the English tongue, according to the best approued authors. Very necessary for all students in any profession, how to defend any argument against all subtill sophisters, and cauelling schismatikes, and how to confute their false syllogismes, and captious arguments. By M. Blundevile." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A16218.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 1, 2024.

Pages

Of the generall kinde.
WHat is generall kinde?

It is that which comprehendeth many things diffe∣ring

Page 9

in speciall kinde, as hath beene said before.

How are Arguments to be fetched from the generall kinde to the speciall kinde?

Both affirmatiuely and negatiuely: affirmatiuely thus, Euery vertue is to be desired: Ergo Iustice is to be desired. Negatiue∣ly thus, No vice is to be praised: Ergo drunkennes is not to be praised.

Rehearse the Maxims belonging to the generall kinde?

To what kinde soeuer agreeth the generall kind being vni∣uersally taken (that is to say) pronounced with some vniuersall signe, a•…•… All, Euery or None, to the same the speciall kind doth also agree: and whatsoeuer agreeth not with the generall kinde 〈◊〉〈◊〉 taken, agreeth not with the speciall kind: sor if no vniuersall signe be added to the generall kinde, you can∣not reason affirmatiuely, but onely negatiuely, thus: It is no sensible body: Ergo it is no man: but you cannot reason so affir∣matiuely, as to say thus, It is a sensible body: Ergo it is a man: because the vniuersal signe All, or Euery, is wanting.

How many Places doth this Place of generall kinde comprehend?

Foure, (that is to say) All or euery in quantitie, All or euery in respect, All or euery in place, All or euery in time.

What is All or euery in quantitie?

It is when an vniuersall signe is added to the generall kind, as euery plant liueth, therefore euery tree liueth.

When is it all or euery 〈◊〉〈◊〉 respect?

When any generall kind is vnderstood in some respect, and that the generall signification thereof is restrained by some word added vnto it, or by some secret meaning limiting the 〈◊〉〈◊〉, as a white beast, a good man: for this word white restrai∣neth the general signification of beast, and this word good the g•…•…nerall signification of man.

Giue examples of this place.

God gaue his holy spirit to all faithfull men: Ergo to his A∣postles.

What is all or euery in place?

It is when the generall kinde is an aduerbe of place, sig∣nifying euery where or no where, as Iustice is no where

Page 96

truly executed: Ergo neither in Frauce nor in England.

What is all or euery in time?

It is when the generall kinde is an aduerbe of time, signify∣ing euer or neuer, as God is alwaies with vs: Ergo now at this present.

What maxims doe belong to these places?

The same that doe belong to the generall kinde vniuersally taken before mentioned, by vertue whereof you may reason both affirmatiuely and negatiuely, as I said before.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.