thus, Here is neither timber, lime not s•…•…one: Ergo here is no house.
How are arguments to be fetched from Matter transient?
Affirmatiuely, but not negatiuely, as heere is water and meale: Ergo here may be bread: but you can not say, here is no meale: Ergo here is no bread: for the matter permanent being taken away, the effect thereof is also taken away: but this Maxime taketh no place in matter transient, vnlesse the Argu∣ment be made by the preterperfect Tense or time past, as thus: Here was no meale: Ergo here is no bread.
What be the Maxims of this Place?
The matter being set downe, the effect also may bee accor∣ding to the difference of the matter.
How may we reason from the thing made to the matter?
In matter permanent you may reason from the present Tense to the present Tense, thus: Heere are iron weapons: Ergo heere is iron. But in matter transient wee must reason from the pre∣sent time to the time past, thus; here is bread: Ergo heere hath been meale.
What be the Maxims of this Place?
The thing made of matter permanent being set downe, the matter also must needs be: and the thing made of matter transi∣ent being set downe, the matter therof must needs haue been.
How may you else reason from these two Places?
By adding these two adiectiues (good or euill) as thus: The house is good: Ergo the timber and stone was good: for the goodnes or defect of the matter permanent, sheweth the pre∣sent goodnesse or defect of the thing made: and any good or euill thing made of Matter transient, proueth the Matter to haue been good or euill.