The arte of logick Plainely taught in the English tongue, according to the best approued authors. Very necessary for all students in any profession, how to defend any argument against all subtill sophisters, and cauelling schismatikes, and how to confute their false syllogismes, and captious arguments. By M. Blundevile.

About this Item

Title
The arte of logick Plainely taught in the English tongue, according to the best approued authors. Very necessary for all students in any profession, how to defend any argument against all subtill sophisters, and cauelling schismatikes, and how to confute their false syllogismes, and captious arguments. By M. Blundevile.
Author
Blundeville, Thomas, fl. 1561.
Publication
London :: Printed by William Stansby, and are to be sold by Matthew Lownes,
1617.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Logic -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A16218.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The arte of logick Plainely taught in the English tongue, according to the best approued authors. Very necessary for all students in any profession, how to defend any argument against all subtill sophisters, and cauelling schismatikes, and how to confute their false syllogismes, and captious arguments. By M. Blundevile." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A16218.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 8, 2024.

Pages

WHat belongeth properly to disiunctiue Propositions?

To consist of repugnant parts, according to the

Page 83

signification of Coniunctions disiunctiue, such as these bee, vel or eyther, or else, and such like: as eyther it is day, or it is night, whereof the one destroyeth the other: for if the one be, the other can not be: and therefore they can not bee both true: but they may be both false, if there be any mean betwixt the two contraries: as when wee say, This woman is eyther white or blacke, both these are false, if she be browne, which is a meane colour betwixt white and blacke. But the later writers affirme the disiunctiue to bee true, if any one or both of the parts bee true, as thus, Eyther a man is a sensible body, or else a tree is a Substance: and to bee false when both parts bee false, as Eyther a man is true, or God is a lyar.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.