The answer.
And why say you at the least in one kind? Was it euer heard of in the world that the sacram••nt was minist••ed in lesse than one
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
And why say you at the least in one kind? Was it euer heard of in the world that the sacram••nt was minist••ed in lesse than one
kind? But you would haue said if you durst for shame, that they ministred but in one kind. And then if you had had any fathers that fauored that exposition, we should also haue heard of them. But your doctrine of concomitance, the groundworke of your halfe communion was then not hatched in hell. The fathers were vtterly ignorant of it.