1. THe Protestants denie not, but that the lawes of Magistrates as touching external rites and obser∣uations doe binde in conscience, but not in regard of the things commaunded, which are of themselues indiffe∣rent, and touch not the conscience, as the prohibiting of eating of flesh, wearing of apparell, but in regard onely of our obedience due vnto the Magistrate in lawfull things. But concerning Princes lawes of things necessa∣rily appertaining to Gods seruice and the keeping of the commaundements, such doe simply binde in conscience, enioyning the same, and none other things which God commaundeth in his word. And this is that which is af∣firmed in Synopsis, which doctrine the aduersarie shall neuer bee able to disproue: and therefore he seeketh to obscure this truth by lying; being not ashamed to vtter here two great vntruths, as though it were affirmed, that Magistrates lawes doe not at all binde in conscience and secret, and as though the question were of all lawes, and not onely of externall rites and vsages, which are in their owne nature indifferent: for treasons and treacheries are directly contrarie to the law of God, and doe pollute the conscience: and such lawes doe binde absolutely in con∣science, both in respect of the particular thing comman∣ded, and of the generall rule of obedience.
2. Though Protestants teach, that onely faith doth iu∣stifie, yet they affirme not onely faith to be necessarie. And our opinion is, that iustifying faith cannot be with∣out fruites: that whereas there are no good workes there is no faith: neither was that euer a right faith, which ne∣uer brought foorth good workes. It is therefore a foolish consequent brought in by him: Protestants are iustified onely by faith: Ergo, felons, murthers, treasons may be