A replie to Iesuit Fishers answere to certain questions propou[n]ded by his most gratious Matie: King Iames By Francis White D: of Div· deane of Carlile, chaplaine to his Matie. Hereunto is annexed, a conference of the right: R:B: of St Dauids wth the same Iesuit*

About this Item

Title
A replie to Iesuit Fishers answere to certain questions propou[n]ded by his most gratious Matie: King Iames By Francis White D: of Div· deane of Carlile, chaplaine to his Matie. Hereunto is annexed, a conference of the right: R:B: of St Dauids wth the same Iesuit*
Author
White, Francis, 1564?-1638.
Publication
London :: Printed by Adam Islip,
1624.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Fisher, John, 1569-1641 -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Apologetic works -- Early works to 1800.
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Cite this Item
"A replie to Iesuit Fishers answere to certain questions propou[n]ded by his most gratious Matie: King Iames By Francis White D: of Div· deane of Carlile, chaplaine to his Matie. Hereunto is annexed, a conference of the right: R:B: of St Dauids wth the same Iesuit*." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15082.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 16, 2024.

Pages

Page 498

IESVIT. [ A]

Also because the Manichees, being impiously per suaded that wine was the gall of the prince of darknesse, did su∣perstitiously abstaine from the Chalice. The Church in dete∣station of this errour, commaunded, for a time, Communion vnder both kinds: Vpon which ocasion Gelasius Pope made the decree recorded by Gratian, aut integra Sacramenta suscipiant, aut ab integris arceantur. And why, because [ B] such Abstinents, 〈◊〉〈◊〉 qua superstitione docentur a∣stringi, that is were superstitious, not abstaining out of any deuotion, but out of impious persuasion of the impuri∣tie of Gods creature. Wherefore the crime with which some Protestants charge vs, That our receiuing vnder the sole forme of Bread, is to iumpe in opinion with the Ma∣nichees, we may (as Doctor Morton confesseth) reiect as in∣jurious, saying, That it was not the Manichees 〈◊〉〈◊〉 [ C] from wine, but the reason of their for 〈◊〉〈◊〉, that was iudged hereticall. This custome was the cause that Cypri∣an saieth, That the Law 〈◊〉〈◊〉 the eating of bloud, but the 〈◊〉〈◊〉 commaunds the same should be drunke, not only because some Christians, to wit, Priests are bound to 〈◊〉〈◊〉 the Bloud of Christ, but also because Christ in his 〈◊〉〈◊〉 did 〈◊〉〈◊〉 the Sacrament of his Bodie and Bloud in both kinds. Whence grew the custome of the Primitiue Church, to receiue in both kinds, and by custome there grew further, [ D] an Oligation to drinke of the 〈◊〉〈◊〉 there were some iust cause of 〈◊〉〈◊〉, as in the sicke, and in some that by nature loathed wine.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.