A counterblast to M. Hornes vayne blaste against M. Fekenham Wherein is set forthe: a ful reply to M. Hornes Answer, and to euery part therof made, against the declaration of my L. Abbat of Westminster, M. Fekenham, touching, the Othe of the Supremacy. By perusing vvhereof shall appeare, besides the holy Scriptures, as it vvere a chronicle of the continual practise of Christes Churche in al ages and countries, fro[m] the time of Constantin the Great, vntil our daies: prouing the popes and bishops supremacy in ecclesiastical causes: and disprouing the princes supremacy in the same causes. By Thomas Stapleton student in diuinitie.

About this Item

Title
A counterblast to M. Hornes vayne blaste against M. Fekenham Wherein is set forthe: a ful reply to M. Hornes Answer, and to euery part therof made, against the declaration of my L. Abbat of Westminster, M. Fekenham, touching, the Othe of the Supremacy. By perusing vvhereof shall appeare, besides the holy Scriptures, as it vvere a chronicle of the continual practise of Christes Churche in al ages and countries, fro[m] the time of Constantin the Great, vntil our daies: prouing the popes and bishops supremacy in ecclesiastical causes: and disprouing the princes supremacy in the same causes. By Thomas Stapleton student in diuinitie.
Author
Stapleton, Thomas, 1535-1598.
Publication
Louanii :: Apud Ioannem Foulerum. An. 1567. Cum priuil.,
[1567]
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Horne, Robert, 1519?-1580. -- Answeare made by Rob. Bishoppe of Wynchester, to a booke entituled, The declaration of suche scruples, and staies of conscience, touchinge the Othe of the Supremacy, as M. John Fekenham, by wrytinge did deliver unto the L. Bishop of Winchester -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Feckenham, John de, 1518?-1585.
Royal supremacy (Church of England) -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A12940.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A counterblast to M. Hornes vayne blaste against M. Fekenham Wherein is set forthe: a ful reply to M. Hornes Answer, and to euery part therof made, against the declaration of my L. Abbat of Westminster, M. Fekenham, touching, the Othe of the Supremacy. By perusing vvhereof shall appeare, besides the holy Scriptures, as it vvere a chronicle of the continual practise of Christes Churche in al ages and countries, fro[m] the time of Constantin the Great, vntil our daies: prouing the popes and bishops supremacy in ecclesiastical causes: and disprouing the princes supremacy in the same causes. By Thomas Stapleton student in diuinitie." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A12940.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 3, 2024.

Pages

M. Horne. The .151. Diuision. pag. 89 b.* 1.1

Besydes these Lavviers, this vvas the common opinion of the chiefest vvri∣ters of the cōmon Lavv of this realme, as appeareth (.496.)* 1.2 by Braughton in these vvoordes: Sunt & sub rege &c. Vnder the King are bothe freemen and bondemen, and they be subiect to his power, and are all vnder him, and he is a certaine thing or creature that is vnder none but onely vnder God. And againe in the Chapiter the title vvhereof is this. Rex non habet parem, &c. The King hath no peere or equall in his Kingdome: The King (saith he) in his Kingdom hath no equall, for so might he lose his precepte or authoritie of commaunding, sithe that an equall hathe no rule or commaundement ouer his equall: as for the King himselfe ought not to be vnder man, but vnder God, and vnder the law, because the Law maketh a King. Let the King therefore attri∣bute that vnto the Lawe, that the Lawe attributeth vnto him,* 1.3 to wit, dominion and power. For he is not a King in whom will and not the law doth rule, and that he ought to be vnder the Law, Cùm sit Dei Vicarius, sith he is the Vicare of God, it appeareth euidently by the likenes of Iesu Christe, whose vicegerent he is in earth: and vvithin a litle after he concludeth thus: Igitur non debet maior esse eo in regno suo (.497.) Therfore there ought to be none greater then he in his kingdome.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.