A counterblast to M. Hornes vayne blaste against M. Fekenham Wherein is set forthe: a ful reply to M. Hornes Answer, and to euery part therof made, against the declaration of my L. Abbat of Westminster, M. Fekenham, touching, the Othe of the Supremacy. By perusing vvhereof shall appeare, besides the holy Scriptures, as it vvere a chronicle of the continual practise of Christes Churche in al ages and countries, fro[m] the time of Constantin the Great, vntil our daies: prouing the popes and bishops supremacy in ecclesiastical causes: and disprouing the princes supremacy in the same causes. By Thomas Stapleton student in diuinitie.

About this Item

Title
A counterblast to M. Hornes vayne blaste against M. Fekenham Wherein is set forthe: a ful reply to M. Hornes Answer, and to euery part therof made, against the declaration of my L. Abbat of Westminster, M. Fekenham, touching, the Othe of the Supremacy. By perusing vvhereof shall appeare, besides the holy Scriptures, as it vvere a chronicle of the continual practise of Christes Churche in al ages and countries, fro[m] the time of Constantin the Great, vntil our daies: prouing the popes and bishops supremacy in ecclesiastical causes: and disprouing the princes supremacy in the same causes. By Thomas Stapleton student in diuinitie.
Author
Stapleton, Thomas, 1535-1598.
Publication
Louanii :: Apud Ioannem Foulerum. An. 1567. Cum priuil.,
[1567]
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Horne, Robert, 1519?-1580. -- Answeare made by Rob. Bishoppe of Wynchester, to a booke entituled, The declaration of suche scruples, and staies of conscience, touchinge the Othe of the Supremacy, as M. John Fekenham, by wrytinge did deliver unto the L. Bishop of Winchester -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Feckenham, John de, 1518?-1585.
Royal supremacy (Church of England) -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A12940.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A counterblast to M. Hornes vayne blaste against M. Fekenham Wherein is set forthe: a ful reply to M. Hornes Answer, and to euery part therof made, against the declaration of my L. Abbat of Westminster, M. Fekenham, touching, the Othe of the Supremacy. By perusing vvhereof shall appeare, besides the holy Scriptures, as it vvere a chronicle of the continual practise of Christes Churche in al ages and countries, fro[m] the time of Constantin the Great, vntil our daies: prouing the popes and bishops supremacy in ecclesiastical causes: and disprouing the princes supremacy in the same causes. By Thomas Stapleton student in diuinitie." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A12940.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 14, 2024.

Pages

Stapleton.

A faire pleasurely, for one Schismatique to plead vppon the Authority of an other Schismatike. As if you would say M. Horne: Aske my fellow, if I be a theefe. For both the Author Nilus, and the first setter forth therof,* 1.1 Flaccus Illy∣ricus, are knowen and notorious, the one a Schismatike, the other an Heretik. And therfore what so euer ye here bring oute of Nilus bookes, it weigheth no more, then if yowe brought Illyricus him selfe, or Luther his Maister.

Page [unnumbered]

* 1.2And to saye the truth, it is nothing but an heape of vn∣truthes: not only on your Authours parte, but on youres also, ouerreaching him shamefully, as I shall anon declare. But as for your authour, if he would haue considered no more but his owne predecessours the Archbisshoppes of Thessalonica, he should haue found, that they almost one thousand yeares before, had an other and a better iudge∣ment of the Popes authoritie: and were at that time the popes Legates for the Easte partes: as well appeareth by Pope Leo his epistles, to Anastasius Bishop there. And that the Pope had the principal charge of al churches, by Gods owne ordinaunce: contrary to the saying of your schisma∣tical authour of so late yeres. And yet as bad as he is, he doth litle relieue yow. For he graūteth the Pope to be Pa∣triarche of the Weste Churche. And so is he, (thowgh he were not the Chiefe absolutelye) yet our patriarche and cheif Bishop: and therfore cheiflie to be consulted in all greate and weighty ecclesiastical affayres. Againe though he be badde inoughe, yet is he the worse for coming into your fingers. For where you make him to say, the only cause of diuision betwene the Greke and the latine Churche was, for that the Pope wil not suffer free ād general Coūcelles to be cal∣led by the Emperours &c. There is no suche thinge in Nilus (I haue of purpose perused him ouer neither in the Greke nor in the Translation of Flaccus Illiricus. It is your own Captayne and Notorious vntruth.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.