As touching Arnulphus the Bishop of Rhemes depo∣sed by a Councel there called (as you say) by Hugh Ca∣pet the French King, and Gilbert put in his place, it is true you saie: but you tell not all. For afterwardes (as Nau∣clerus reporteth) because Arnulphus coulde not be depo∣sed, without the authoritie of the bisshop of Rome, M. Gil∣bert was deposed againe, and Arnulphus restored. Where∣vpon Gilbert fled to Otho, and was in a certaine time after made Bisshop of Rauēna. This is the whole story M. Horn, and this declareth the Popes authoritie, aboue youre Su∣preme Gouernour, Hugh Capet the French King.
Where you adde, that King Robert sonne to Hugh Ca∣pet, was a diligent labourer about Diuine or Church matters, if you had told forth, wherin, as your Author doth, saying: Composuit enim multas prosas & hymnos. For he made manie proses and hymnes, to be song in the Churche, your tale had bene to small purpose: excepte to make songs for the Church, do proue a man Supreme Gouernour in al Church causes or things. And then you haue more supreme gouer∣nours then one▪ not onely in England, but in London, yea and in the Court too, I trowe. Of Iohn the .18. and Grego∣rie the .5. we shal say more anon.
But nowe whether Syluester the .2. were a coniurer or no, to your mater it maketh neuer a whit, and there is more to be said to the contrary, whiche neadelesse we nede not now to allege, then ye shal perchaunce, this whole twelue moneths wel answere vnto. But I woulde now faine aske you M. Horne, who is this Siluester? What was his name before I pray you? Forsoth, gentle Reader, this Siluester is he, by whose electiō to be B. of Rhemes, M. Horne in the last page, would proue the Frēch king to be Supreme head