A iustification of separation from the Church of England Against Mr Richard Bernard his invective, intituled; The separatists schisme. By Iohn Robinson.
About this Item
Title
A iustification of separation from the Church of England Against Mr Richard Bernard his invective, intituled; The separatists schisme. By Iohn Robinson.
Author
Robinson, John, 1575?-1625.
Publication
[Amsterdam :: G. Thorp],
Anno D. 1610.
Rights/Permissions
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
Subject terms
Bernard, Richard, 1568-1641. -- Christian advertisements and counsels of peace -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Controversial literature.
Brownists -- Early works to 1800.
Congregationalism -- Early works to 1800.
Cite this Item
"A iustification of separation from the Church of England Against Mr Richard Bernard his invective, intituled; The separatists schisme. By Iohn Robinson." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A10835.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 2, 2024.
Pages
2. Beleeve every collection truely & necessarely gathered by an immediateconsequence from the text.
This is good but not sufficient. For collections truely made (though by mediate consequences one after another) are to be re∣ceaved, though the fewer the better, and the lesse subiect to daun∣ger. And we must not curtall the discourse of reason soberly vsed and sanctifyed by the word, so short as Mr. B. would haue vs. When the Lord Iesus was to deal with the Saduces about the re∣surrection he took his proof from that which is written, Exo. 3. 6. I am the God of Abraham, &c. which words do no way conclude the resurrection of the body (which was the question) by any immedi∣ate consequence, and yet the collection was good and necessary.
The 3. and 4. direction I omit as questionles, and come to the 5. in order.