The Catholique triumph conteyning, a reply to the pretensed answere of B.C. (a masked Iesuite,) lately published against the Tryall of the New Religion. Wherein is euidently prooued, that Poperie and the doctrine now professed in the Romish church, is the new religion: and that the fayth which the Church of England now mayntaineth, is the ancient Romane religion.

About this Item

Title
The Catholique triumph conteyning, a reply to the pretensed answere of B.C. (a masked Iesuite,) lately published against the Tryall of the New Religion. Wherein is euidently prooued, that Poperie and the doctrine now professed in the Romish church, is the new religion: and that the fayth which the Church of England now mayntaineth, is the ancient Romane religion.
Author
Bell, Thomas, fl. 1593-1610.
Publication
At London :: Printed for the companie of Stationers,
1610.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Woodward, Philip, ca. 1557-1610. -- Bels trial examined.
Church of England -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Cite this Item
"The Catholique triumph conteyning, a reply to the pretensed answere of B.C. (a masked Iesuite,) lately published against the Tryall of the New Religion. Wherein is euidently prooued, that Poperie and the doctrine now professed in the Romish church, is the new religion: and that the fayth which the Church of England now mayntaineth, is the ancient Romane religion." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A07770.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 5, 2024.

Pages

The Digression.

THe Secular popish Priestes aswell French as English, haue published in print may Bookes; in which they haue most liuely pourtrayed and paynted out the Iesuites in their best beseeming colours. They affirme constant∣ly in their sayd Bookes, of the Iesuites in generall; that they be Proud men, Tyrantes, Coozeners, Thieues, Gyp∣sies, Murderours, and men of no Religion. Of Robert Parsons that trayterous and foule-mouthed Jesuite, in particular; that hee is a Bastard, a notorious Drunkard, a Deceiuer, a Traytor, a prouoker of others to Treason, the Monster of mankind, a Farie-brat, begotten of some Incubus; and what not? All which, are plainely and truly related in my Booke, intituled, The Anatomie of Popish

Page 124

tyrannie: Which Booke, hee that hath not seene and read, may seeme to be ignorant of the deepest poyntes of Iesuiticall Theologie. These Bookes do so gall & wound the Jesuites, at the very heart, as they know not in the world what to say or answere in that behalfe. Clerke and Watson lately executed for their most notorious treasons, wrote sundry Bookes against the sayd Jesuites. This Iesu∣ite B. C. is so mightily assayled and turmoyled, with that which I cite out of Watson, that in one place, to weete, in his Epistle about the 27. page, hee hath these wordes. The Author he alleadgeth is some Quodlibeta∣rian Minister, though poore Watson beareth the name. But in an other place, to weete, in the eight Chapter of this present Pamphlet, he writeth thus. Bell sheweth smal con∣science in belying the dead, and laying more faultes vpon him vniustly; when alasse, hee had otherwise too many. Againe, Watson speaketh of matters of fact. In which twaine, the Iesuite flatly contradicteth himselfe: In the former, hee would gladly finde out an other Author. But in the latter, hee vnawares fathereth the Booke vpon Watson; telling Bell, that hee belyeth the dead. To which I adde: that Watson vpon his death, did acknowledge himselfe to be the Author.

Notes

  • Robert Parsōs begot two Ba∣stards, Male & Female, vpon the body of his owne sister. Betweene his age of 17. & 23. he was an He∣retike of the Family of Loue, till he became a Ie∣suite.

    See my Ana∣tomy. P. 71.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.