The Catholique triumph conteyning, a reply to the pretensed answere of B.C. (a masked Iesuite,) lately published against the Tryall of the New Religion. Wherein is euidently prooued, that Poperie and the doctrine now professed in the Romish church, is the new religion: and that the fayth which the Church of England now mayntaineth, is the ancient Romane religion.

About this Item

Title
The Catholique triumph conteyning, a reply to the pretensed answere of B.C. (a masked Iesuite,) lately published against the Tryall of the New Religion. Wherein is euidently prooued, that Poperie and the doctrine now professed in the Romish church, is the new religion: and that the fayth which the Church of England now mayntaineth, is the ancient Romane religion.
Author
Bell, Thomas, fl. 1593-1610.
Publication
At London :: Printed for the companie of Stationers,
1610.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Woodward, Philip, ca. 1557-1610. -- Bels trial examined.
Church of England -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Cite this Item
"The Catholique triumph conteyning, a reply to the pretensed answere of B.C. (a masked Iesuite,) lately published against the Tryall of the New Religion. Wherein is euidently prooued, that Poperie and the doctrine now professed in the Romish church, is the new religion: and that the fayth which the Church of England now mayntaineth, is the ancient Romane religion." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A07770.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 5, 2024.

Pages

The Fourth Conclusion.

Popish Auricular Confession, is not necessarie for mans saluation. For [ 1] first, seeing all thinges necessarie for saluation, are conteyned in the holy Scriptures, as in the third Conclusion: [ 2] Secondly, seeing all Preceptes and Promises of God in the New, are contayned in the Old Testament; as in the first Conclusion: [ 3] Thirdly, seeing Popish Auricular Confession is not contayned in the Old Testament, as in the second Conclusion: it follo∣weth by a necessarie and ineuitable consequution, that Popish Auricular Confession is not necessarie for mans saluation. This trueth will yet better appeare, in the Conclusions following.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.