the Venetians, let slippe the occasion of a woorthy victo∣rie,
when he knew not how to take his time to charge the
enemie, as he might well haue done at Sapienza. But on
the contrarie, as often as the Emperour Charles the fift set
foorth an armie to some purpose, the Turke durst neuer
looke abroad; as when he vndertooke the voyage of Tu∣nis
and of Algiers, where neuerthelesse he encountred
many disasters, he brought before Tunis seauen hundred
saile, and before Algiers fiue hundred onely. Thus much
for experience.
2 Now we must see what reasons we haue in store to
prooue that we may more easily assaile the Turke by sea
then by land. Among others this may passe, that our seas
are more frequented, and our ports more rich and safe
then those of the Leuant. For first (set aside Constantino∣ple)
there is not thoroughout their obedience, any one
Porte that may be equalled to those of Venice, Lisbone,
Siuill, Antwerp, London, Amsterdam, Lubec, or Danske,
&c. and very few also that may be compared with those
of Naples, Genoua, Villa-Franca, Nessina, Palermo,
Ragusa, Marsseilles, Tolon, Bourdeaux, New-Hauen,
Rochelle, and Rouane, &c.
3 It is cleere then that we surmount the Turke not only
in numbers of Portes and good harbers for the retraict
and shelter of our armies, but also in Mariners and men
accustomed and experienced in both the seas. Moreouer,
there is not perhaps in the world a coast that affoordeth
greater plentie of men then that of Genoua, Dalmatia,
Sclauonia, Venice, Candye. Againe, there is not a nation
to be found of more resolution or better proofe for sea af∣faires,
then are those of Marseilles. I omit to speake of the
Catalonian, the Portugal, the Biskayan, the English, the
Norman, the Hollander, and Zelander, all people mar∣ueilous
skilfull in Nauigation.
4 I would willingly demaund, what it auaileth the Turke
to possesse a large and spacious sea bordering country, if it
remaine vnhabited; neither were it enough if it were: for