[Rudimenta grammatices]
About this Item
- Title
- [Rudimenta grammatices]
- Author
- Linacre, Thomas, 1460-1524.
- Publication
- [Impress. Londini :: In ædibus Pynsonianus. Cum priuilegio a rege indulto,
- [ca. 1525]]
- Rights/Permissions
-
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
- Subject terms
- Latin language -- Grammar -- Early works to 1800.
- Cite this Item
-
"[Rudimenta grammatices]." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A05516.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 20, 2024.
Pages
Page [unnumbered]
XEnophon, et Plato fuere aequales. why be Xe∣nophon and Plato put in lyke case? For cōiun∣ctions copulatiues and disiunctiues wyl euer, •••• all casuall wordes, as longe as they be referred ••o one verbe, ioyne lyke case. as Xenophon et Plato fuere aequales.
Socratres docuit Xenophontem et Platonem.
And these iiij {quam}, nisi, praeter{quam}, and an, lyke copula∣tiues wyll ioyne lyke case.
¶Q{quam} animus horret. why is horret the indicatyue mode? For quāquam and etsi be comonly construed with the indicatiue mode of verbes. as Qua••quam animus horret.
〈◊〉〈◊〉 vereo•• ••udices.
And lyke wyse tametsi. as Tametsi iactat.
Quis and licet moste comonly with the subiunctiue mode•• as Quis exeat. Licet miretur.
S••, donec, dum for donec, ante{quam}, post{quam}, prius{quam}, be construed both with the indicatiue and subiūctyue. Vt, for that, comyng a••ter a uerbe is construed with ••he subiunct••ue alonely. Lyke wyse vt for {quam}uis.