[Rudimenta grammatices]
About this Item
- Title
- [Rudimenta grammatices]
- Author
- Linacre, Thomas, 1460-1524.
- Publication
- [Impress. Londini :: In ædibus Pynsonianus. Cum priuilegio a rege indulto,
- [ca. 1525]]
- Rights/Permissions
-
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
- Subject terms
- Latin language -- Grammar -- Early works to 1800.
- Cite this Item
-
"[Rudimenta grammatices]." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A05516.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 20, 2024.
Pages
Page [unnumbered]
SEquor, what verbe? A verbe deponēt. why? For he endeth in or, and hath signification of acty∣ues or neutres.
¶Sequor maiores. why is maiores the accusatyue ••••••e? For al deponentes, that haue signification of ••ctiues, be construed with an accusatiue after them of the sufferer, lyke as actiues be. As sequor, inse∣••u••••, aggredior, adorior, furor, praedor, populor, o∣pinor, and generally all, that besyde theyr nomina∣••iue may haue before them, this qstion what thyng ••••xed of the sufferer. as Precor mortē. Loquor iusta. Except certayn deponentes neutres, whiche shalbe rehersed.
¶Opinor redijsse. why is redijsse the infinytyue mode? For these deponentes, conor, molior, infici∣or, reo••, opinor, vereor, hortor, precor, gratulor, of a worde betokenyng a dede, be construed with the ••••finitiue mode. as Molior auferre.
¶Reminiscor huius rei, or hanc rem. why putteste thou the genitiue or the accusatiue aft reminiscor? ••or these deponētes, recordor, reminiscor, obliui∣scor may be construed with a genitiue or an accusa∣tiue.
¶Lamentor, what deponēt? A deponent absolute. why? For with his nominatyue case, and his owne ••ignificatiō, it may without any other casual worde content the herer. And suche verbes be philosofor, ••usticor, expergiscor, morior, iocor, nugor, spacior, ••agor, labor, peregrinor, periclitor, ratiocinor, lu∣••••o••, crapulor, pergrecor, proficiscor, ingredior for gradior, reuertor, congredior, altercor, tumultuor, grassor, lamentor, orior, nascor, renascor.
¶Proficiscor ad vrbem. why cometh the accusatiue
Page [unnumbered]
case, with a preposicion, after proficiscor? For neu∣tres absolutes, that betoken mouyng, wyll haue an accusatiue case of nownes appellatyues, answeryng to this question whyther, with one of these preposi∣tions, ad or in. as I go. whyther? To the cite. ad vr∣bem. And an ablatiue with a prepositiō, a or ab, an∣sweryng to this question, from whens.
¶Proficiscor visum. why cometh the supin in tum, a••ter proficiscor? For neutres absolut{is} betokenyng mouyng, haue aft them a supine in tū, of the worde that answereth to this questiō, what to do. as I go. what to do? To se. Visum.
¶Suffragor, what maner deponēt? A deponent trā¦sitiue. why? For it hath signification lyke a neutre transitiue.
¶Suffragor amico. why is amico the datiue case? For these transitiues deponentes, auxilior, admini∣culor, opitulor, suffragor, innitor, blandior, minor adulor, assentor, medeor, aduersor, obsequor, mo∣deror, insidior, and dominor, with suche other, be construed with a datyue.
¶Vtor pulla veste. why is veste thablatiue case? For these deponētes, vtor, abutor, fruor, fūgor, vescor, potior, be cōstrued with an ablatiue. And potior al∣so is cōstrued with a genitiue. as Potior rerum, and lykewyse to it also misereor. as Misereor inopum.