A reioindre to M. Iewels replie against the sacrifice of the Masse. In which the doctrine of the answere to the .xvij. article of his Chalenge is defended, and further proued, and al that his replie conteineth against the sacrifice, is clearely confuted, and disproued. By Thomas Harding Doctor of Diuinitie.

About this Item

Title: A reioindre to M. Iewels replie against the sacrifice of the Masse. In which the doctrine of the answere to the .xvij. article of his Chalenge is defended, and further proued, and al that his replie conteineth against the sacrifice, is clearely confuted, and disproued. By Thomas Harding Doctor of Diuinitie.
Author: Harding, Thomas, 1516-1572.
Publication: Louanii :: Apud Ioannem Foulerum,; Anno. 1567.
Rights/Permissions: To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
Subject terms: Jewel, John, 1522-1571. -- Replie unto M. Hardinges answeare -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.; Private masses -- Early works to 1800.
Cite this Item: "A reioindre to M. Iewels replie against the sacrifice of the Masse. In which the doctrine of the answere to the .xvij. article of his Chalenge is defended, and further proued, and al that his replie conteineth against the sacrifice, is clearely confuted, and disproued. By Thomas Harding Doctor of Diuinitie." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A02635.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 8, 2024.

Pages

Iewel.

But M. Harding condemneth vs al for Foolishe, and VVicked peo∣ple. For Foolishe, I knovv not vvhy. Neither is it thought a vvise-mannes parte, either greatly to mislike other mennes vvittes, or ouer∣muche to like his ovvne. Hovv be it, vvho so speaketh, as neuer vvise-man spake, and yet him selfe vnderstandeth not, vvhat he speaketh, as, in this case, it is thought, M. Harding doth, hath no greate cause, in this behalfe, to charge others vvith folie.