The honor of the married clergie, maintayned against the malicious challenges of C.E. Masse-priest: or. The apologie written some yeeres since for the marriage of persons ecclesiasticall made good against the cauils of C.E. pseudo-Catholik priest. In three books. By Ios. Hall, D. of Diuin. Deane of Worcest.

About this Item

Title
The honor of the married clergie, maintayned against the malicious challenges of C.E. Masse-priest: or. The apologie written some yeeres since for the marriage of persons ecclesiasticall made good against the cauils of C.E. pseudo-Catholik priest. In three books. By Ios. Hall, D. of Diuin. Deane of Worcest.
Author
Hall, Joseph, 1574-1656.
Publication
London :: Printed by W. S[tansby] for H. Fether[stone],
1620.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Coffin, Edward, 1571-1626. -- Refutation of M. Joseph Hall his apologeticall discourse, for the marriage of ecclesiasticall persons.
Celibacy -- Early works to 1800.
Cite this Item
"The honor of the married clergie, maintayned against the malicious challenges of C.E. Masse-priest: or. The apologie written some yeeres since for the marriage of persons ecclesiasticall made good against the cauils of C.E. pseudo-Catholik priest. In three books. By Ios. Hall, D. of Diuin. Deane of Worcest." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A02548.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 5, 2024.

Pages

SECT. XVI.

HIs third Ponderation is the same with the first; Euerie thing eekes. His Saint Dun∣stan and Anselme, Gregorie and Bede are againe layd in our dish; wee cannot feed on these ouer-oft-sod Coleworts. I am challenged here, to produce any Priest or Deacon that liued in Wedlocke before the times of Dunstan; The man pre∣sumes

Page 335

vpon the suppression of Re∣cords. For one, I name him hun∣dreds. Who were they that Dun∣stan and his fellow-Saints found sea∣ted in the Cathedrall Churches of this Land? whome did they eiect? Were they not marryed Priests? What did the eiected Clergie plead but ancient possession? After that; in the Synode which Archbishop a Lanfranck held at Winchester (which I wonder my Detectour would ouer-see: This neglect is not for nothing;) was it not decreed, that the Canons should not haue Wiues, but that the Priests which dwelt in Townes and Villages, should not bee compelled to put a∣way their Wiues; though caution is put in for the future?

What doth this imply, but that in those ancient Times the English Clergie were inoffensiuely married? To which adde that olde Record from an ancient Martyrologe of the Church of Canterbury: LANFRAN∣CVS Archiepiscopus reddidit Eccle∣siae

Page 336

Sancti ANDREae, &c. LAN∣FRANCK Archbishop hath restord to Saint ANDREWES Church; the Mo∣nasterie of Saint MARIE with the Lands and Houses which LIVINGVS Priest, and his Wife had in London, &c. And before him, or Dustan ei∣ther, in King Edmunds time, b Bishop Osulphus with Athelme and Vlrick, Laicks, thrust out of the Monkes of Euesham, and placed Canons (mar∣ried Priests) in their roome.

Lastly, Iornalensis records it as King Ina's Law, long before these times; Si Episcopi filiolus sit, sitdimi∣dium hoc, &c. as supposing this no other then ordinarie in those times.

Now let my Refuter comfort himselfe and his Catholikes, with the weake defence of Heresie, and the strong Bulwarkes of Romane Truth; who in the meane time must be put in minde, that he puts on me the burden which should lye vpon his own shoulders; I haue produced Histories which affirme perempto∣rily, that the English Clergie were

Page 337

neuer forbidden to marrie vntil An∣selmes time; it is now his taske to disprooue this assertion of theirs by equall authoritie to the contrarie, which till hee haue done, the day is ours.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.