were neuer confirmed by Parleament.
The 31. difference is imposition of handes, which is a
meere slaunder, for that cerimonie is vsed of vs in or∣deining
of Ministers, likewise where he saith, that whē
all the Popish Bishops were deposed, there was none
to lay handes on the Bishops that should be newely
consecrated, it is vtterly false. For there was one of the
Popish Bishops that continued in his place, there were
also diuers that were consecrated Bishops in King Ed∣wardes
time, and although there had bene but one in
that time of reformation, it had been sufficient by his
owne Gregories resolution, Bed. lib. 1. cap. 27. An other
example is Lib. 3. cap. 28. of Ceadda Archbishop of
Yorke, consecrated by Wini Bishop of the West Sax∣ons
assisted by two Bryton Bishops, that were not sub∣iect
to the see of Rome: Bicause at that time, there
was neuer a Bishop of the Romish faction in England
but this Wini, who was also a Simoniake, and bought
the Bishoprike of London for money. I speake not
this, as though in planting of the Church, where it
hath bene long time exiled, an extraordinarie forme
of ordaining were not sufficient, but to shewe that the
Papistes doe picke quarels, contrarie to their owne
pretended recordes of antiquitie, and Catholike reli∣gion.
Where he inueigheth against the vnsufficiencie of
a number of our Ministers, which are come out of the
shop into the Cleargie, without giftes sufficient for
that calling, as I can not excuse them, nor their ordei∣ners,
so I dare be bolde to affirme, they are no worse
either in knowledge or conuersation, then the huge
rable of hedge Priestes of Poperie.
The 32. difference, that such Bishops as were created
by the Archbishops of Canterburie and Yorke, were
created by the appointment of the Pope. This is a
shamelesse lye, for which he can bring no colour, ei∣ther
out of the first sixe hundreth yeares, or out of
Bedes historie. Where he saith, If it can be shewed by a∣ny