A defense of the sincere and true translations of the holie Scriptures into the English tong against the manifolde cauils, friuolous quarels, and impudent slaunders of Gregorie Martin, one of the readers of popish diuinitie in the trayterous Seminarie of Rhemes. By William Fvlke D. in Diuinitie, and M. of Pembroke haule in Cambridge. Wherevnto is added a briefe confutation of all such quarrels & cauils, as haue bene of late vttered by diuerse papistes in their English pamphlets, against the writings of the saide William Fvlke.

FVLK. 5. Certaine it is, that no Englishman know∣eth the difference betweene iust and righteous, vniust & vnrighteous, sauing that righteousnesse & righteous are the more familiar English wordes. And that we meane no fraude betweene iustice and righteousnesse, to apply the one to faith, the other to workes, reade Rom. 10. v. 34. 5. and 6. of the Geneua translation, where you shall see, the righteousnesse of the law, & the righteousnesse of faith. Reade also against this impudent lie, in the same translatiō Luc. 1. Zacharie and Elizabeth were both iust. Cap. 2. Simeon was iust. Mathew the firste, Ioseph a iust man; and else where often times, and without any diffe∣rence in the worlde, from the worde righteous. Who euer heard a difference made, betweene a iuste iudge and a righteous iudge, this trifling is too too shameful abu∣sing of mens patience, that shall vouchsafe to reade these blotted papers.