❧ THE XV. PRO. ••It is contrarius & repugnant to the custom of the primittu•• Kirk to institut & cōmand any publict f••sting on Sonday & to ma•• bankets on Fryday.
AD. This is prouin be Tertulian quhan he wrytis of the constitutioun of the Kirk, saying we hald it as a sacriledge to command any fasting on Sonday.
AN. Since by the scriptur y• art not able to confirme this, we are not constranit to obey mens inuentions, for Tertulian in that same place saith, it is altogether vnlaufull that vpon y• Sonday in worshipping God, to fal vpon our knees the con∣trair quhairof notwithstanding his autoritie, is rasauit be al chri¦stians, & thairfoir we may als easily reiect this superstitloun in fasting vpon the Fryday, as not kneling vpon the Sonday, & ʒit he wryts vther wais in his buik contra PSYC. saying we mā hencfurth fast wtout cōpulsion, of fre will not be comandimēt of this new disceplin, acording as euery mā sal se time & place
AD. Epipha, sha••s that Aerius was condēnit as a herityk becaus he eats flesh on fryday
AN. I think that the probation of this, is, t••at thy asser••iō most suffice for autoritie, shaw me the place, & I will pr••pare the an ansuer, alwaies to satisfy y• present I ask of the as S ••y. writing to Pomp. against the Epistle of Ste. frō whence haue we this tradition? ••hither cumith it frō the autority of ye Lord or of the Euangel, or els fra the cōmandiments & Epistilles of the Apostles? yairfor if it ather be cōmandit in ye ••uāgel or cō••enit in the acts or epi. of y• Apostils, let ••s keip ye same tradi••iō