De laudibus legum Angliæ writen by Sir Iohn Fortescue L. Ch. Iustice, and after L. Chancellor to K. Henry VI. Hereto are ioind the two Summes of Sir Ralph de Hengham L. Ch. Iustice to K. Edward I. commonly calld Hengham magna, and Hengham parua. Neuer before publisht. Notes both on Fortescue and Hengham are added
About this Item
Title
De laudibus legum Angliæ writen by Sir Iohn Fortescue L. Ch. Iustice, and after L. Chancellor to K. Henry VI. Hereto are ioind the two Summes of Sir Ralph de Hengham L. Ch. Iustice to K. Edward I. commonly calld Hengham magna, and Hengham parua. Neuer before publisht. Notes both on Fortescue and Hengham are added
Author
Fortescue, John, Sir, 1394?-1476?
Publication
London :: [Printed by Adam Islip?] for the Companie of Stationers,
M.DC.XVI [1616]
Rights/Permissions
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
Subject terms
Law -- England -- Early works to 1800.
Cite this Item
"De laudibus legum Angliæ writen by Sir Iohn Fortescue L. Ch. Iustice, and after L. Chancellor to K. Henry VI. Hereto are ioind the two Summes of Sir Ralph de Hengham L. Ch. Iustice to K. Edward I. commonly calld Hengham magna, and Hengham parua. Neuer before publisht. Notes both on Fortescue and Hengham are added." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A01083.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 1, 2024.
Pages
descriptionPage 47
Ad CAP. XXXIX
23 PRolem ante matrimonium.] This point of Ciuill law, is text in C. tit. de Naturalibus lib. l 10. cum quis. Quomodo (saies Iustinian) non est iniquissimum ipsam stirpem secundae posteritatis priorem quasi in∣iustam excludere, cum gratias agere fratrib{us} suis posteriores debeant, quorum beneficio ipsi sunt iusti filij, & nomen & ordinem consecuti. For the birth of the first is often cause of the mariage following. But it is limited by some Doctors, that the woman be before in concubinatu, in familia retenta, that there be indubitatus affectus sicut in vxore &c. as you may see in Bartol. ad finem π. de Concu∣binis. Mynsinger. ad Instit. de Nuptijs §. Ali∣quando. Gothofred. ad Nouell. 89. cap. 15. The Canon law agrees with the Ciuill in this matter, as is shown in an Epistle of Pope Alexander 3. to the Bishop of Exce∣ster in Ext. tit. Qui filij sint legit. c. 6. Tanta est vis.
email
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem?
Please contact us.