The elements of geometrie of the most auncient philosopher Euclide of Megara. Faithfully (now first) translated into the Englishe toung, by H. Billingsley, citizen of London. Whereunto are annexed certaine scholies, annotations, and inuentions, of the best mathematiciens, both of time past, and in this our age. With a very fruitfull præface made by M. I. Dee, specifying the chiefe mathematicall scie[n]ces, what they are, and wherunto commodious: where, also, are disclosed certaine new secrets mathematicall and mechanicall, vntill these our daies, greatly missed
About this Item
- Title
- The elements of geometrie of the most auncient philosopher Euclide of Megara. Faithfully (now first) translated into the Englishe toung, by H. Billingsley, citizen of London. Whereunto are annexed certaine scholies, annotations, and inuentions, of the best mathematiciens, both of time past, and in this our age. With a very fruitfull præface made by M. I. Dee, specifying the chiefe mathematicall scie[n]ces, what they are, and wherunto commodious: where, also, are disclosed certaine new secrets mathematicall and mechanicall, vntill these our daies, greatly missed
- Author
- Euclid.
- Publication
- Imprinted at London :: By Iohn Daye,
- [1570 (3 Feb.]]
- Rights/Permissions
-
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
- Subject terms
- Geometry -- Early works to 1800.
- Cite this Item
-
"The elements of geometrie of the most auncient philosopher Euclide of Megara. Faithfully (now first) translated into the Englishe toung, by H. Billingsley, citizen of London. Whereunto are annexed certaine scholies, annotations, and inuentions, of the best mathematiciens, both of time past, and in this our age. With a very fruitfull præface made by M. I. Dee, specifying the chiefe mathematicall scie[n]ces, what they are, and wherunto commodious: where, also, are disclosed certaine new secrets mathematicall and mechanicall, vntill these our daies, greatly missed." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A00429.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 2, 2024.
Pages
Page 430
the semidiameter of the Sphere.
SVppose that the Octohedron AECDB be inscribed in the Sphere ABCD: and let the cube inscribed in the same Sphere be FGHIM: whose diameter let be HI, which is e∣quall to the diameter AC, by the 15. of the thirtenth: let the halfe of the diameter be AE. Then I say, that the cube FGHIM is to the Octohedron AECDB, as the side MG is to the semidiameter AE. Forasmuch as the diameter AC is in power double to BK the side of the Octohedron (by the 14. of the thirtenth) and is in power triple to MG the side of the cube (by the 15. of the same): therefore the square BKDL shall be sesquial••er to FM the square of the cube. From the line AE cut of a third part AN, and frō the line MG cut of like∣wise a third part GO, by the 9. of the sixth. Now then the line EN shall be two third partes of the line AE, and so also shall the line MO be of the line MG. Wherefore the parallelipipedon set vpon the base BKDL, and hauing his altitude the line EA, is triple to the parallelipipedon set vpon the same base, and hauing his altitude the line AN, by the Corollary of the 31. of the eleuenth: but it is also tri∣ple to the pyramis ABKDL which is set vpon the same base, and is vnder the same altitude (by the se∣cond Corollary of the 7. of the twelfth). Wherefore the pyramis ABKDL is equall to the parallelipi∣pedon, which is set vpon the base BKDL, and
A Corollary.
Distinctly to notefie the powers of the sides of the fiue solides by the power of the diameter of the sphere.
The sides of the tetrahedron and of the cube doo cut the power of the diameter of the sphere in∣to two squares which are in proportion double the one to the other. The octohedron cutteth the
Page [unnumbered]
power of the diameter into two equall squares. The Icosahedron into two squares, whose proportion is duple to the proportion of a line diuided by an extreame and meane proportion, whose lesse segmēt is the side of the Icosahedron. And the dodecahedron into two squares, whose proportion is quadru∣ple to the proportion of a line diuided
By this meanes therefore, the diameter of a sphere being geuen, there shall be ge∣uen the side of euery one of the bodies inscribed. And forasmuch as three of those bo∣dies haue their sides commensurable in power onely, and not in length, vnto the dia∣meter geuen (for their powers are in the proportion of a square number to a number not square: wherefore they haue not the proportion of a square number to a square number, by the corollary of the 25. of the eight: wherefore also their sides are incom∣mensurabe in length by the 9. of the tenth): therefore it is sufficient to compare the powers and not the lengths of those sides the one to the other•• which powers are con∣tained in the power of the diameter: namely, from the power of the diameter, let there ble taken away the power of the cube, and there shall remayne the power of the Tetra∣hedron: and taking away the power of the Tetrahedron, there remayneth the power of the cube: and taking away from the power of the diameter halfe the power thereof, there shall be left the power of the side of the octohedron. But forasmuch as the sides of the dodecahedron and of the Icosahedron are proued to be irrationall (for the side of the Icosahedron is a lesse line, by the 16. of the thirtenth: and the side of the dedocahe∣dron is a residuall line, by the 17. of the same) therfore those sides are vnto the diame∣ter which is a rationall line set, incommensurable both in length and in power. Where∣fore their comparison can not be diffined or described by any proportion expressed by numbers, by the 8. of the tenth: neither can they be compared the one to the other: for irrational lines of diuers kindes are incōmēsurable the one to the other: for if they should be commensurable, they should be of one and the selfe same kinde, by the 103. and 105. of the tenth, which is impossible. Wherefore we seking to compare them to the power of the diameter, thought they could not be more aptly expressed, then by such proportions, which cutte that rationall power of the diameter according to their sides: namely, diuiding the power of the diameter by lines which haue that proportiō, that the greater segment hath to the lesse, to put the lesse segment to be the side of the Icosahedron: & deuiding the sayd power of the diameter by lines hauing the propor∣tion of the whole to the lesse segment, to expresse the side of the dodecahedron by the lesse segment: which thing may well be done betwene magnitudes incommensurable.
Notes
-
Construction.
-
Demonstra∣tion.