Title: | Optimism |
Original Title: | Optimisme |
Volume and Page: | Vol. 11 (1765), p. 517 |
Author: | Jean-Baptiste le Rond d'Alembert (biography) |
Translator: | Jack Iverson [Whitman College] |
Subject terms: |
Philosophy
|
Original Version (ARTFL): | Link |
Rights/Permissions: |
This text is protected by copyright and may be linked to without seeking permission. Please see http://quod.lib.umich.edu/d/did/terms.html for information on reproduction. |
URL: | http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.did2222.0000.460 |
Citation (MLA): | d'Alembert, Jean-Baptiste le Rond. "Optimism." The Encyclopedia of Diderot & d'Alembert Collaborative Translation Project. Translated by Jack Iverson. Ann Arbor: Michigan Publishing, University of Michigan Library, 2005. Web. [fill in today's date in the form 18 Apr. 2009 and remove square brackets]. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.did2222.0000.460>. Trans. of "Optimisme," Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, vol. 11. Paris, 1765. |
Citation (Chicago): | d'Alembert, Jean-Baptiste le Rond. "Optimism." The Encyclopedia of Diderot & d'Alembert Collaborative Translation Project. Translated by Jack Iverson. Ann Arbor: Michigan Publishing, University of Michigan Library, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.did2222.0000.460 (accessed [fill in today's date in the form April 18, 2009 and remove square brackets]). Originally published as "Optimisme," Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, 11:517 (Paris, 1765). |
Optimism, the name given to the opinion of philosophers who pretend that this world is the best one God could create, the best of all possible worlds. Father Malebranche and especially Mr. Leibnitz have strongly contributed to gaining acceptance for this school of thought, see Malebranchisme and Leibnitzianism. It is primarily in his Theodicy that the latter of these two philosophers explained and developed his system. It is possible to get some idea of it in his eulogy, published by M. de Fontenelle, Memoirs of the Academy, year 1716 . He maintains, for example, that the crime of Tarquinius who raped Lucretia was accessory to the beauty and perfection of the moral world because this crime produced Roman liberty and, as a consequence, all the virtues of the Roman Republic. But why were the virtues of the Roman Republic necessarily preceded and produced by a crime? This is what we are not told and what it would be quite difficult to explain. And further, how can this optimism be reconciled with the liberty of God, an additional and no less cumbersome question? How is it that so many men slaughter one another in the best of all possible worlds? And if this is the best of all possible worlds, why did God create it? The answer to all these questions consists of two words: o altitudo! [oh, the depth! — a reference to Romans 11.33], etc. It must be recognized that this metaphysics of optimism is utterly empty.