Petri Philomeni de Dacia in algorismum vulgarem Johannis de Sacrobosco commentarius. Una cum algorismo ipso edidit et praefatus est Maximilianus Curtze.

43 addideris, quantum ad capitulum ante istud. Et incipit secunda pars ibi: Similiter in additione, et patent partes. Sed alium modum examinandi additionem habes supra. Hic etiam alium modum dabo examinandi, si bene subtraxisti nec ne, sed primo ponam exemplum, in quo tanguntur omnes casus incidentes in 5 hac specie, quae est subtractio. Sit numerus iste, a quo debet fieri subtractio, 10222, numerus vero subtrahendus ille 5432, quos secundum praedicta in hoc capitulo sic locabis: 10222 5432. 10 Subtrahas igitur primam a prima, scilicet 2 de 2, et nichil remanet; loco ergo superioris deletae ponatur 0. Deinde subtrahas secundam de secunda, scilicet 3 de 2, et quia non potes, accipe 1 de 2 in proximo loco, et remanet 1, quod in tertio loco ponas loco 2. Subtrahe igitur 3 de 12, quae labes aggre- 15 gata ex 2, a quo debebas subtrahere, et ab eo, quod mutuatum est, et tunc remanet 9, quae ponas loco secundo, scilicet loco 2. Quo facto subtrahas tertiam de tertia, scilicet 4 de 1; sed quia non potes, ergo, cum in loco proximo est 0, accipe 1 de figura proxima post 0, et quia illa est 1, deleas illam. Sed non oportet 20 loco eius ponere 0, quia nulla figura sequitur. Quia igitur unitas valuit centum respectu figurae, a qua debuisti subtrahere, ideo de illis centum relinquas 90, faciendo 9 de 0, quae erit in via, et sic non remanet nisi denarius. Ab hoc igitur denario adiuncta unitati, a qua debuisti snbtrahere, subtrahas 4, et re- 25 manent 7, quae ponas loco 1. Deinde subtrahas quartam de quarta, scilicet 5 de 9, et remanent 4, quae ponas loco 9 deleti, et remanebunt haec figurae 4790. Si igitur probare velis, utrum bene subtraxisti, addas figuras, quas subtraxisti, ad figuras hic residuas, et redibunt eaedem figurae, quae primo ponebantur. 30 Vel sic hoc probes, quia, si proba numeri residui et proba numeri, quem subtraxisti, fuerint aequales probae numeri, a quo subtraxisti, bene fecisti. Est autem proba, sicut dictum est, (residuum) abiecto quotiens potest novenario, et erit proba utrobique 7.

/ 113
Pages

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 40-59 Image - Page 40 Plain Text - Page 40

About this Item

Title
Petri Philomeni de Dacia in algorismum vulgarem Johannis de Sacrobosco commentarius. Una cum algorismo ipso edidit et praefatus est Maximilianus Curtze.
Author
Sacro Bosco, Joannes de, fl. 1230.
Canvas
Page 40
Publication
Hauniae,: A. F. Host,
1897.
Subject terms
Arithmetic

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acv7283.0001.001
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/u/umhistmath/acv7283.0001.001/64

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Historical Mathematics Digital Collection Help at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/umhistmath:acv7283.0001.001

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Petri Philomeni de Dacia in algorismum vulgarem Johannis de Sacrobosco commentarius. Una cum algorismo ipso edidit et praefatus est Maximilianus Curtze." In the digital collection University of Michigan Historical Math Collection. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acv7283.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 6, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.