Colloquium publications.

ANALYSIS SITUS. 67 Orientable Complexes 57. The theorem of the last section is equivalent to the statement that if r2 = a2 - 1 for a 2-circuit C2 the boundaries of the 2-cells of C2 can be converted into oriented 1-circuits in such a way that their sum is zero. If r2 = a2 the boundaries of the 2-cells evidently cannot be thus oriented. In the first case C2 is said to be two-sided or orientable and in the second case to be one-sided or non-orientable. A manifold is said to be orientable or non-orientable according as the complex defining it is or is not orientable. This extension of the term is justified by the theorems of ~~ 58-60 below according to which the complexes defining a given manifold M2 are all orientable or all non-orientable. This definition is equivalent to the one given in 1865 by A. F. Mobius, Ueber die Bestimmung des Inhaltes eines Polyeders, Werke, Vol. 2, p. 475; see also p. 519. The term "orientable" was suggested by J. W. Alexander as preferable to "two-sided" because the latter term connotes the separation of a threedimensional manifold into two parts, the two "sides," by the two-dimensional manifold, whereas the property which we are dealing with is an internal property of the two-dimensional manifold.* The intuitional significance of orientableness is perhaps best grasped by experiments with the well-known M6bius paper strip described in the article referred to above. These experiments can also be used to verify the theorems on deformation and on the indicatrix in Chap. V. 58. Suppose that a 2-cell a,2 of a complex C2, the cells of which have been oriented in the manner described above, is separated into two 2-cells by a 1-cell a1. The two new 2-cells are bounded * On the relation between orientableness and two-sidedness, see E. Steinitz, Sitzungsberichte der Berliner Math. Ges., Vol. 7 (1908), p. 35; and D. Konig, Archiv. der Math. u. Phys., 3d Ser., Vol. 19 (1912), p. 214. The term orientable (orientierbar) has also been used by H. Tietze in an article in the Jahresbericht der Deutschen Math. Ver., Vol. 29 (1920), p. 95, which came to my attention while these lectures were in proof-sheets. This article contains a general discussion of orientability covering a number of the questions referred to in the beginning of Chap. V below, and also a useful collection of references.

/ 313
Pages

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 58-77 Image - Page 67 Plain Text - Page 67

About this Item

Title
Colloquium publications.
Author
American Mathematical Society.
Canvas
Page 67
Publication
New York [etc.]
1905-
Subject terms
Mathematics.

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acd1941.0005.001
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/u/umhistmath/acd1941.0005.001/230

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Historical Mathematics Digital Collection Help at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/umhistmath:acd1941.0005.001

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Colloquium publications." In the digital collection University of Michigan Historical Math Collection. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acd1941.0005.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 19, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.