Elementary arithmetic, with brief notices of its history... by Robert Potts.

ON TIIE DIVISIONS AND MEASURES OF TIME. 17 A.u.O. It will be obvious this ancient mode was different from the modern mode of reckoning. The year before, after the Roman manner of reckoning, being considered the year of the birth, the preceding year was reckoned the second year before the event. It will be obvious, as the date A.D. did not begin to be reckoned from 0, but from 1, in calculating any number of days between any year before and any year after the epoch of the Christian era, one year must be subtracted from the sum of the dates. The pontificate of Gregory XIII. was distinguished by the reformation of the calendar, but was indelibly disgraced by his approbation of the massacre of the Protestants in France on St. Bartholomew's Day in the year 1572. His infamy is perpetuated by the medal he had struck to commemorate that deed of bloodshed.1 The eleven minutes' excess of each Julian year above the tropical year had so accumulated between the years 325 and 1582, A.D., that the reckoning of the vernal equinox took place 10 days too early. At the time of the Council of Niceca in 325, the vernal equinox fell on 21st March, and the Council decreed that the festival of Easter should be celebrated on the first Sunday after the full moon that happened after this equinox. In 1582 the vernal equinox, according to the reckoning, fell on 11th March; and the festival of Easter, coming 10 days too early, occasioned also irregularity in the times of celebrating other festivals of the Church. In order to bring back the reckoning to the true time of the equinox, Pope Gregory XIII. caused ten whole days to be omitted or left out of the month of October, in the year 1582, so as to make the years in future to agree with the seasons, and the vernal equinox to be reckoned at the right time. And in order to prevent the recurrence of this error at any future time, it was fixed that, besides the Julian correction of every fourth year being a bissextile, the last year A.D. of every complete century, if divisible by 400, should also be a bissextile year, but if not so divisible, a common year. According to this rule the year 1600 would be a bissextile year, and the years 1700, 1800, 1900 would be reckoned as common years. 1 When the French ambassador waited on Queen Elizabeth to report such an account of the proceedings at Paris as Charles IX. deemed proper to be announced, <n entering the palace he found the apartments leading to the Queen's presencechamber filled with crowds of courtiers in deep mourning, and as he passed through them, no one offered any friendly salutation. He said that his master had instructed him to inform the Queen that Admiral Coligny, smitten by his conscience, had confessed to the King that the Protestants had conspired to seize both him and the Queen mother, and that the dread of a civil war had driven his sovereign to allow the opposite party to proceed to the execution of their enemies. On hearing his message, the Queen expressed her esteem for King Charles, and proceeded to say:"Although, indeed, if the information had been found true, yet the manner of cruelty used could not be allowed in any government, and least in that place, where the King might, by order of justice, have done due execution, both on the Admiral and on all others that should have been proved offenders. For it could not be denied but the same force that murdered so many multitudes might more easily have put down the leaders, especially the wounded Admiral, under arrest. She was willing to believe that those councillors, whose age and experience ought to have made them useful guides to their young sovereign, were more to be blamed than he." And the Queen concluded by saying that "she did surely persuade herself that if the King would not use his power to make some amends for so much blood, so horribly shed, God, who saw the hearts of all, as well of princes as of others, would show His justice, in time and place; when His honour should therein be glorified, <s the author of all justice, and the avenger of all blood-shedding of the innocent."

/ 389
Pages

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 8-3 Image - Page 8 Plain Text - Page 8

About this Item

Title
Elementary arithmetic, with brief notices of its history... by Robert Potts.
Author
Potts, Robert, 1805-1885.
Canvas
Page 8
Publication
London,: Relfe bros.,
1876.
Subject terms
Arithmetic

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/abu7012.0001.001
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/u/umhistmath/abu7012.0001.001/130

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Historical Mathematics Digital Collection Help at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/umhistmath:abu7012.0001.001

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Elementary arithmetic, with brief notices of its history... by Robert Potts." In the digital collection University of Michigan Historical Math Collection. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/abu7012.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 7, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.