• Abes, E. S., Jackson, G., & Jones, S. R. (2002, Fall). Factors that motivate and deter faculty use of service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 9(l), 5–17.
  • Adams, M., Bell, L.A., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1997). Teaching for diversity and social justice: A sourcebook. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Alstete, J. W. (2000). Post-tenure faculty development: Building a system of faculty improvement and appreciation (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 27[4]). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Altman, I. (1996, April). Higher education and psychology in the millennium. American Psychologist, 51(4), 371–378.
  • Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1993, March). Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(3), 431–441.
  • American Association of University Professors. (1987). Statement on professional ethics. Retrieved June 17, 2006, from www.aaup.org/statements/Redbook/Rbethics.htm
  • American Association of University Professors. (1990). 1940 statement of principles on academic freedom and tenure. Retrieved June 24, 2006, from www.aaup.org/statements/ Redbook/1940stat.htm
  • American Psychiatric Association. (n.d.). Disasters: Mental health recommendations for students and colleges. Retrieved June 17, 2006, from http://healthyminds.org/katrinatips forcollege.cfm
  • Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Longman.
  • Armstrong, F., & Moore, M. (2004). Action research: Developing inclusive practice and transforming cultures. In F. Armstrong & M. Moore (Eds.), Action research for inclusive education: Changing places, changing practices, changing minds (pp. 1–16). London, England: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Arnsten, A. F. T. (1998, June). The biology of being frazzled. Science, 280(5370), 1711–1712.
  • Arreola, R. A. (2000). Developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation system: A handbook for college faculty and administrators on designing and operating a comprehensive faculty evaluation system (2nd ed.). Bolton, MA: Anker.
  • Ash, S. L., Clayton, P. H., & Atkinson, M. P. (2005, Spring). Integrating reflection and assessment to capture and improve student learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 11(2), 49–60.
  • Asmussen, K. J., & Creswell, J. W. (1995, September/October).Campus response to a student gunman. Journalof Higher Education, 66(5), 575–596.
  • Association of College and Research Libraries. (2001). Statement on the terminal professional degree for academic librarians. Retrieved June 24, 2006, from www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/statementterminal.htm
  • Association of College and Research Libraries. (2002 ). Guidelines for academic status for college and university librarians. Retrieved June 24, 2006, from www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/guidelinesacademic.htm
  • Astin, A. W., & Astin, H. S. (1993). Undergraduate science education: The impact of different college environments on the educational pipeline in the sciences. Los Angeles, CA: University of California–Los Angeles, Higher Education Research Institute.
  • Astin, A. W., & Sax, L. J. (1998, May/June). How undergraduates are affected by service participation. Journal of College Student Development, 39(3), 251–263.
  • Baldwin, J. (1963). The fire next time. New York, NY: Modern Library.
  • Baldwin, R. G. (1990, March/April). Faculty vitality beyond the research university: Extending a contextual concept. Journal of Higher Education, 61(2), 160–180.
  • Baldwin, R. G. (2002, Fall). Engaging mid-career faculty in a time of transition. Tire Department Chair, 13(2), 7–10.
  • Baldwin, R. G., & Chronister, J. L. (2001). Teaching without tenure: Policies and practices for a new era. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Bamburg, J. D. (1994). Raising expectations to improve student Learning. Naperville, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
  • Banta, T. W., Lund, J. P., Black, K. E., & Oblander, F. W. (1996). Assessment in practice: Putting principles to work on college campuses. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Baptiste, I. (2000, May). Beyond reason and personal integrity: Toward a pedagogy of coercive restraint. Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education, 14(1), 27–50.
  • Barefoot, B. O. (Ed.). (1993). Exploring the evidence: Reporting outcomes of freshman seminars (Monograph No. 11). Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition.
  • Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995, November/December). From teaching to learning—A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27(6), 12–25.
  • Barrington, J. (2002). Writing the memoir: A practical guide to the craft, the personal challenges, and ethical dilemmas of writing your true stories (2nd ed.). Portland, OR: Eighth Mountain Press.
  • Bartlett, T. (2002, May 10). Students become curricular guinea pigs. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A12.
  • Battistoni, R. (2002). Civic engagement across the curriculum: A resource book for service-learning faculty in all disciplines. Providence, RI: Campus Compact.
  • Bellows, L., & Weissinger, E. (2005). Assessing the academic and professional development needs of graduate students. In S. Chadwick-Blossey & D. R. Robertson (Eds.), To improve the academy: Vol. 23. Resources for faculty, iustructional, and organizational development (pp. 267–283). Bolton, MA: Anker.
  • Bender, T. (1997). Intellect and public life: Essays on the social history of academic intellectuals in the United States. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Benson, L., & Harkavy, I. (1996, June). Communal participatory action research as a strategy for improving universities and the social sciences: Penn’s work with the West Philadelphia Improvement Corps as a case study. Educational Policy, 10(2), 202–222.
  • Bernstein, D., & Bass, R. (2005, July/August). The scholarship of teaching and learning. Academe, 91(4), 37–43.
  • Bishop, R. (1994). Initiating empowering research. New Zealand Journa/ of Educational Studies, 29(1), 175–188.
  • Black, B. (1998). Using the SGID method for a variety of purposes. In M. Kaplan & D. Lieberman (Eds.), To improve the academy: Vol. 17. Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (pp. 245–262). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
  • Blackburn, R. T. (1985). Faculty career development: Theory and practice. In S. M. Clark & D. R. Lewis (Eds.), Faculty vitality and institutional productivity: Critical perspectives for higher education (pp. 55–85). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Blaisdell, M. L., & Cox, M. D. (2004). Midcareer and senior faculty learning communities: Learning throughout faculty careers. In M. D. Cox & L. Richlin (Eds.), New directions for teaching and learning: No. 97. Building faculty learning communities (pp. 137–148). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Blake, W. (1963). The marriage of heaven and hell. Coral Gable, FL: University of Miami Press. (Original work published 1790)
  • Bland, C. J., & Bergquist, W. H. (1997), The vitality of senior faculty members: Snow on the roof—fire in the furnace (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 25[7]). Washington, DC: George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development.
  • Bland, C. J., & Schmitz, C. C. (1990). An overview of research on faculty and institutional vitality. In J. H. Schuster, D. W. Wheeler, & Associates, Enhancing faculty careers: Strategies for development and renewal (pp. 41–61). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Blixrud, J. C. (2000). ARL SPEC KIT 257, the M.L.S. hiring requirement. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.
  • Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: Longman.
  • Boice, R. (1990). Countering common misbeliefs about student evaluations of teaching. Teaching Excellence, 2(2).
  • Boice, R. (1991, January). New faculty as colleagues. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 4(1), 29–44.
  • Boice, R. (1992). The new faculty member: Supporting and fostering professional development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Boice, R. (2000). Advice for new faculty members: Nihil nimus. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Washington, DC: George Washington University.
  • Border, L. L. B. (2002). The Socratic portfolio: A guide for future faculty. PS: Political Science& Politics, 35(4), 739-743.
  • Border, L. L. B. (2005–06). Teaching portfolios for graduate students: Process, content, product, and benefits. Essays on Teaching Excellence, 17(4).
  • Border, L. L.B., & Chism, N. V. N. (Eds.). (1992). New directions for teaching and learning: No. 49. Teaching for diversity. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America’s research universities. Retrieved June 24, 2006, from the Stony Brook University web site: http://naples.cc.sunysb.edu/Pres/boyer.nsf
  • Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
  • Boyer, E. L. (1994, March 9). Creating the new American college. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A48.
  • Boyer, E. L. (1996, Spring). The scholarship of engagement. Journal of Public Service and Outreach, 1(1), 11–20.
  • Bradley, G. (2001, April 20). Careers in academic libraries. Retrieved June 24, 2006, from http://chronicle.com/jobs/2001/04/2001042003c.htm
  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Braxton, J. M., & Bayer, A. E. (1999). Faculty misconduct in collegiate teaching. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Braxton, J. W., Luckey, W., & Helland, P. (2002). Institutionalizing a broader view of scholarship through Boyer’s four domains (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 29[2]). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Bringle, R. G., Games, R., Foos, C. L., Osgood, R., & Osborne, R. (2000, February). Faculty Fellows Program: Enhancing integrated professional development through community service. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(5), 882–894.
  • Bringle, R. G., Games, R., & Malloy, E. A. (Eds.). (1999a). Colleges and universities as citizens. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Bringle, R. G., Games, R., & Malloy, E. A. (1999b). Colleges and universities as citizens: Reflections. In R. G. Bringle, R. Games, & E. A. Malloy (Eds.), Colleges and universities as citizens ( pp. 193–204). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (1995, Fall). A service-learning curriculum for faculty. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 2(1), 112–122.
  • Bringle, R. G., Hatcher, J. A., Jones, S., & Plater, W. M. (2006). Sustaining civic engagement: Faculty development, roles, and rewards. Metropolitan Universities Journal, 17(1), 62–74.
  • Brinko, K. T. (1997). The interactions of teaching improvement. In K. T. Brinko & R. J. Menges (Eds.), Practically speaking: A sourcebook for instructional consultants in higher education (pp. 3–8). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
  • Britzman, D. P. (1991). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Brookfield, S. D. (2005). The power of critical theory: Liberating adult learning and teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Brookfield, S. D., & Preskill, S. (2005). Discussion as a way of teaching: Tools and techniques for democratic classrooms (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989, January/February). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
  • Brown, R. D., & Krager, L. (1985). Ethical issues in graduate education: Faculty and student responsibilities. Journal of Higher Education, 56(4), 403–418.
  • Brukardt, M. J., Holland, B., Percy, S. L., & Zimpher, N. (2004). Calling the’question: Is higher education ready to commit to community engagement? A Wingspread statement. Milwaukee, WI: University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Milwaukee Idea Office.
  • Buckley, A. (2000, Spring). Tipi technology. Teaching Tolerance, 17, 14–17.
  • Callahan, D. (1982, May/June). Should there be an academic code of ethics? Journal of Higher Education, 53(3), 335–344.
  • Calleson, D. C., Jordan, C., & Seifer, S. D. (2005, April). Community-engaged scholarship: Is faculty work in communities a true academic enterprise? Academic Medicine, 80(4), 317–321.
  • Calleson, D. C., Kauper-Brown, J., & Seifer, S. D. (2005). Community-engaged scholarship toolkit. Seattle, WA: Community-Campus Partnerships for Health.
  • Campbell, P. B., Jolly, E., Hoey, L., & Perlman, L. K. (2002). Upping the numbers: Using research-based decision making to increase diversity in the quantitative disciplines. Newton, MA: Education Development Center, Inc.
  • Campus Compact. (2005). Season of service. Providence, RI: Campus Compact.
  • Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (Producer). (1999). Fostering a scholarship of teaching [Film]. Oregon: West Peak Media.
  • Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267–283.
  • Cashin, W. E. (1988). Student ratings of teaching: A summary of the research (Idea Paper No. 20). Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development.
  • Cashin, W. E., & McKnight, P. C. (1986). Improving discussions (Idea Paper No. 15). Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development.
  • Center for Public Service and Leadership, Indiana University. (1999). Service @ Indiana University: Defining, documenting, and evaluating. Indianapolis, IN: Author.
  • Center for Research on Learning and Teaching, University of Michigan. (2004). Publications and links. Retrieved June 17, 2006, from the University of Michigan, Center for Research on Learning and Teaching web site: www.crlt.umich.edu/publinks/publinks.html
  • Centra, J. A. (1976). Faculty development practices in U.S. colleges and universities. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
  • Checkoway, B. (2001, March). Renewing the civic mission of the American research university. Journal of Higher Education, 72(2), 125–147.
  • Cherwitz, R. A. (2005, November/December). A new social compact demands real change: Connecting the university to the community. Change, 37(6), 48–49.
  • Chesler, M.A. (1990). Action research in the voluntary sector: A case study of scholar-activist roles in health care settings. In S. A. Wheelan, E. A. Pepitone, & V. Abt (Eds.), Advances in field theory (pp. 265–280). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987, June). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3–7.
  • Chism, N. V. N., & Szabo, B. (1996). Who uses faculty development services? In L. Richlin & D. DeZure (Eds.), To improve the academy: Vol. 15. Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (pp. 115–128). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
  • Chittister, J. D. (2002). Seeing with our souls: Monastic wisdom for every day. New York, NY: Sheed and Ward.
  • Chomsky, N. (2002). Understanding power: The indispensable Chomsky (P. R. Mitchell & J. Schoeffel, Eds.). New York, NY: The New Press.
  • Christian, B. (1990). The race for theory: Science, technology and socialist feminism in the 1990s. In K. V. Hansen & I. J. Philipson (Eds.), Women, class, and the feminist imagination: A socialist-feminist reader (pp. 568–579). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
  • Clark, B. R. (1987). The academic life: Small worlds, different worlds. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
  • Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 255–296.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
  • Clark, D. J., & Redmond, M. (1982). Small group instructional diagnosis: Final report. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Department of Biology Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED217954)
  • Clark, S. M., & Corcoran, M. (1985). Individual and organizational contributions to faculty vitality: An institutional case study. In S. M. Clark & D. R. Lewis (Eds.), Faculty vitality and institutional productivity: Critical perspectives for higher education (pp. 112–138). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Clark, S. M., Corcoran, M., & Lewis, D. R. (1986, March/April). The case for an institutional perspective on faculty development. Journal of Higher Education, 57(2), 176–195.
  • Clark, S. M., & Lewis, D. R. (1985). Implications for institutional response. In S. M. Clark & D. R. Lewis (Eds.), Faculty vitality and institutional productivity: Critical perspectives for higher education (pp. 247–256). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Clayton, P. H., & Ash, S. L. (2004, Fall). Shifts in perspective: Capitalizing on the counter-normative nature of service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 11(1), 59–70.
  • Clayton, P. H., & Ash, S. L. (2005, September). Reflection as a key component in faculty development. On the Horizon, 13(3), 161–169.
  • Colby, A., Ehrlich, T., Beaumont, E., & Stephens, J. (2003). Educating citizens: Preparing America’s undergraduates for lives of moral and civic responsibility. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Coles, R. (1989). The call of stories: Teaching and the moral imagination. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching and crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Committee on Institutional Cooperation. (2005). Resource guide and recommendations for defining and benchmarking engagement. Champaign, IL: Author.
  • Cook, C., Gerson, J., Godfrey, J., Kerner, N., Larsen-Freeman, D., Mullane, E., et al. (2002). Report of the Task Force on Testing and Training Prospective GSIs. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
  • Costa, A. L., & O’Leary, P. W. (1992). Co-cognition: The cooperative development of the intellect. In J. Davidson & T. Worsham (Eds.), Enhancing thinking through cooperative learning (pp. 41–65). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Cothran, D. J., Kulinna, P. H., Banville, D., Choi, E., Amade-Escot, C., MacPhail, A., et al. (2005, June). A cross-cultural investigation of the use of teaching styles. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76(2), 193–201.
  • Cox, M. D. (2001). Faculty learning communities: Change agents for transforming institutions into learning organizations. In D. Lieberman & C. Wehlburg (Eds.), To improve the academy: Vol. 19. Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (pp. 69–93). Bolton, MA: Anker.
  • Cox, M. D. (2003). Proven faculty development tools that foster the scholarship of teaching in faculty learning communities. In C. M. Wehlburg & S. Chadwick-Blossey (Eds.), To improve the academy: Vol. 21. Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (pp. 109–142). Bolton, MA: Anker.
  • Crawley, A. L. (1995, Winter). Senior faculty renewal at research universities: Implications for academic policy development. Innovative Higher Education, 20(2), 71–94.
  • Creamer, E. G., & Lattuca, L. R. (Eds.). (2005). New directions for teaching and learning: No. 102. Advancing faculty learning through interdisciplinary collaboration. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cross, K. P., & Steadman, M. H. (1996). Classroom research: Implementing the scholarship of teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cutright, M. (Ed.). (2001). Chaos theory and higher education: Leadership, planning, and policy. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Cutright, M. (2006). A different way to approach the future: Using chaos theory to improve planning. In S. Chadwick-Blossey & D. R. Robertson (Eds.), To improve the academy: Vol. 24. Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (pp. 44–61). Bolton, MA: Anker.
  • Cytrynbaum, S., Lee, S., & Wadner, D. (1982). Faculty development through the life course: Application of recent adult development theory and research. Journal of Instructional Development, 5(3), 11–22.
  • Damasio, A. R. (1994 ). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York, NY: G. P. Putnam.
  • Davis, A. Y. (1974). Angela Davis: An autobiography. New York, NY: International Publishers.
  • Davis, A.Y. (1983). Women, race, and class. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
  • Davis, B. G. (1993). Tools for teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Davis, J. R. (1993). Better teaching, more learning: Strategies for success in postsecondary settings. Phoenix, AZ: American Council on Education/Oryx Press.
  • Delpit, L. D. (1996). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York, NY: New Press.
  • De Russy, C. (2003, September 19). Professional ethics begin on the college campus. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. B20.
  • Desrochers, C. (1999, December). Multi-purpose lecture breaks. The Teaching Professor, 13(10), 1–2.
  • Dews, P. (Ed.). (1992). Autonomy and solidarity: Interviews with Jurgen Habermas (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • DeZure, D. (1999). Interdisciplinary teaching and learning. Retrieved June 19, 2006, from the College of Charleston, Center for Effective Teaching and Learning web site: www.cofc.edu/~cetl/Essays/InterdisciplinaryTeaching&Learning.htm
  • Diamond, M. R. (2002). Preparing TAs to respond to ethical dilemmas. In W. Davis, J. Smith, & R. Smith (Eds.), Ready to teach: Graduate teaching assistants prepare for today and for tomorrow (pp. 47–50). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
  • Diamond, M. R. (2003). How would you handle this situation? Teaching assistant responses to an ethics workshop. Journal of Graduate Teaching Assistant Development, 9(2), 89–96.
  • Diamond, N. A. (2002). Small group instructional diagnosis: Tapping student perceptions of teaching. In K. H. Gillespie, L. R. Hilsen, & E. C. Wadsworth (Eds.), A guide to faculty development: Practical advice, examples, and resources (pp. 82–91). Bolton, MA: Anker.
  • Diamond, R. M., & Adams, B. (Eds.). (1993). New directions for higher education: No. 81. Recognizing faculty work: Reward systems for the year 2000. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • DiPietro, M. (2003). The day after: Faculty behavior in post-September 11, 2001, classes. In C. M. Wehlburg & S. Chadwick-Blossey (Eds.), To improve the academy: Vol. 21. Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (pp. 21–39). Bolton, MA: Anker.
  • Driscoll, A., & Lynton, E. A. (1999). Making outreach visible: A guide to documenting professional service and outreach. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
  • Duffy, D. K., & Jones, J. W. (1995). Teaching within the rhythms of the semester. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Eble, K. E., & McKeachie, W. J. (1985). Improving undergraduate education through faculty development: An analysis of effective programs and practices. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Eby, K. K. (2001, Summer/Fall). Teaching and learning from an interdisciplinary perspective. Peer Review, 3–4(4–1), 28–31.
  • Edgerton, R. (1994). The engaged campus: Organizing to serve society’s needs. AAHE Bulletin, 47(1), 2–4.
  • Elbow, P. (1997). High stakes and low stakes in assigning and responding to writing. In M. D. Sorcinelli & P. Elbow (Eds.), New directions for teaching and learning: No. 69. Writing to learn: Strategies for assigning and responding to writing across the disciplines (pp. 5–13). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Elden, M. (1981).Sharing the research work: Participative research and its role demands. In P. Reason & J. Rowan (Eds.), Human inquiry: A sourcebook of new paradigm research (pp. 261–266). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Ellsworth, E. (1989, August). Why doesn’t this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59(3), 297–324.
  • Epperson, D. L. (2000). Report on one-year and two-year university retention rates associated with first-year participation in a learning community at Iowa State University Ames, IA: Iowa State University, Learning Communities.
  • Erickson, G. (1986). A survey of faculty development practices. In M. Svinicki, J. Kurfiss, & J. Stone (Eds.), To improve the academy: Vol. 5. Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (pp. 182–196). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
  • Eyler, J., & Giles, D. E., Jr. (1999). Where’s the learning in service-learning? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Eyler, J., Giles, D. E., Jr., & Schmiede, A. (1996). A practitioner’s guide to reflection in service-learning: Student voices and reflections. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.
  • Eyler, J., Giles, D. E., Jr., Stenson, C. M., & Gray, C. J. (2001). At a glance: What we know about the effects of service-learning on college students, faculty, institutions, and communities, 1993–2000 (3rd ed.). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.
  • Faculty Center for Excellence in Teaching, Western Kentucky University. (2000). Teaching and learning in a time of crisis. Retrieved June 17, 2006, from the Western Kentucky University, Faculty Center for Excellence in Teaching web www.wku.edu/teaching/ booklets/crisis.html
  • Fantuzzo, J. W., Dimeff, L. A., & Fox, S. L. (1989). Reciprocal peer tutoring: A multimodal assessment of effectiveness with college students. Teaching of Psychology, 16(3), 133–135.
  • Fantuzzo, J. W., Riggio, R. E., Connelly, S., & Dimeff, L. A. (1989). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on academic achievement and psychological adjustment: A component analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 173–177.
  • Farrell, E. F. (2001, December 21). Hedging against disaster. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A40.
  • Fayne, H., & Ortquist-Ahrens, L. (2006). Learning communities for first-year faculty: Transition, acculturation, and transformation. In S.Chadwick-Blossey & D. R. Robertson (Eds.), To improve the academy: Vol. 24. Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (pp. 277–290). Bolton, MA: Anker.
  • Feder, J. (1988). Fractals. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Feichtner, S. B., & Davis, E. A. (1984–85). Why some groups fail: A survey of students’ experiences with learning groups. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, 9(4), 58–71.
  • Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (1994). Cooperative learning in technical courses: Procedures, pitfalls, and payoffs. Retrieved June 16, 2006, from the North Carolina State University web site: www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/Papers/Coopreport.html#lssuesAndAnswers
  • Felder, R. M., Sheppard, S. D., & Smith, K. A. (2005, January). Guest editor’s foreword: A new journal for a field in transition. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 7–10.
  • Feldman, K. A. (1986). The perceived instructional effectiveness of college teachers as related to their personality and attitudinal characteristics: A review and synthesis. Research in Higher Education, 24(2), 139–213.
  • Fink, L. D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Finkel, D. L. (2000). Teaching with your mouth shut. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
  • Finkelstein, M. J. (1993). The senior faculty: A portrait and literature review. In M. J. Finkelstein & M. W. LaCelle-Pcterson (Eds.), New directions for teaching and learning: No. 55. Developing senior faculty as teachers (pp. 7–19). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Finkelstein, M. J., & Jemmott, N. D. (1993). The senior faculty: Higher education’s plentiful yet largely untapped resource. In M. J. Finkelstein & M. W. LaCelle-Peterson (Eds.), New directions for teaching and learning: No. 55. Developing senior faculty as teachers (pp. 95–99). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Finkelstein, M. J., & LaCelle-Peterson, M. W. (Eds.). (1993). New directions for teaching and learning: No. 55. Developing senior faculty as teachers. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Fisch, L. (1996). New directions for teaching and learning: No. 66. Ethical dimensions of college and university teaching: Understanding and honoring the special relationship between teachers and students. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Fish, S. (2005, February 4). Who’s in charge here? Retrieved May 30, 2006, from The Chronicle of Higher Education web site: http://chronicle.com/jobs/2005/02/2005020401c.htm
  • Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class: … And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Florida, R. (2005). The flight of the creative class: The new global competition for talent. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
  • Forsman, A. (Director). (1984). Amadeus [Motion picture]. United States:, Warner Brothers.
  • Frederick, P. (1981, Summer). The dreaded discussion: Ten ways to start. Improving College and University Teaching, 29(3), 109–114.
  • Frederick, P. (1995, Summer). Walking on eggs: Mastering the dreaded diversity discussion. College Teaching, 43(3), 83–92.
  • Frederick, P. J. (1991). The medicine wheel: Emotions and connections in the classroom. In K. J. Zahorski (Ed.), To improve the academy: Vol. 10. Resources for student, faculty, and institutional development (pp. 197–214). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
  • Fromm, E. (1955). The sane society. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
  • Fromm, E. (1961). Marx’s concept of man. New York, NY: Frederick Ungar.
  • Frost, P. J., & Taylor, M. S. (Eds.). (1996). Rhythms of academic life: Personal accounts of careers inacademia. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Frost, R. (1949). Complete poems of Robert Frost. New York, NY: Henry Holt & Company.
  • Furco, A. (1996). Service-learning: A balanced approach to experiential education. In B. Taylor (Ed.), Expanding boundaries: Serving and learning (pp. 2–6). Washington, DC: Corporation for National Service.
  • Gabelnick, F., MacGregor, J., Matthews, R. S., & Smith, B. L. (1990). New directions for teaching and learning: No. 41. Learning communities: Creating connections among students, faculty, and disciplines. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Gabriele, G. A. (2005, July). Guest editorial: Advancing engineering education in a flattened world. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(3), 285–286.
  • Gaff, J. G., Pruitt-Logan, A. S., Sims, L. B., & Denecke, D. D. (2003). Preparing future faculty in the humanities and social sciences: A guide for change. Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools and the Association of American Colleges and Universities.
  • Gappa, J. M., Austin, A. E., & Trice, A. G. (2005, November/December). Rethinking academic work and workplaces. Change, 37(6), 32–39.
  • Gelmon, S. G., & Agre-Kippenhaan, S. (2002, January). Promotion, tenure, and the engaged scholar: Keeping the scholarship of engagement in the review process. AAHE Bulletin, 54(5), 7–11.
  • Geltner, B. B. (1993, October). Collaborative action research: A critical component in the preparation of effective leaders and learners. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, Houston, TX.
  • Gess-Newsome, J., Southerland, S. A., Johnston, A., & Woodbury, S. (2003, Fall). Educational reform, personal practical theories, and dissatisfaction: The anatomy of change in college science teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 731–767.
  • Gibson, G. W. (1992). Good start: A guidebook for new faculty in liberal arts colleges. Bolton, MA: Anker.
  • Gillespie, K. (2001, October). Marketplace reality and our dreams of the profession. Paper presented at the 26th annual conference of the Professional and Organizational Development Network in Higher Education, St. Louis, MO.
  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Glassick, C. E. (1999). Ernest L. Boyer: Colleges and universities as citizens. In R. G. Bringle, R. Games, & E. A. Malloy (Eds.), Universities and colleges as citizens (pp. 17–30). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Glassick, C. E., Huber, M. T., & Maeroff, G. I. (1997). Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
  • Goldberg, B., & Finkelstein, M. (2002, Summer). Effects of a first-semester learning community on nontraditional technical students. Innovative Higher Education, 26(4), 235–249.
  • Golde, C. M., & Dore, T. M. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Philadelphia, PA: The Pew Charitable Trusts.
  • Golde, C.M., & Pribbenow, D. A. (2000, January/February). Understanding faculty involvement in residential learning communities. Journal of College Student Development, 41(1), 27–40.
  • Goodman, M. J. (1994, Fall). The review of tenured faculty at a research university: Outcomes and appraisals. Review of Higher Education, 18(1), 83–94.
  • Goodsell Love, A. (1999). What are learning communities? In J. H. Levine (Ed.), Learning communities: New structures, new partnerships for learning (pp. 1–8). Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition.
  • Gooler, D. D. (1991). Professorial vitality: A critical issue in higher education. DeKalb, IL: LEPS Press.
  • Gouldner, A. W. (1957, December). Cosmopolitans and locals: Toward an analysis of latent social roles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2(3), 281–306.
  • Graduate Teacher Program, University of Colorado–Boulder. (2005). Provost’s fellow in the libraries. Retrieved June 24, 2006, from the University of Colorado–Boulder, Graduate Teacher Program web site: www.colorado.edu/gtp/professional/provost/library
  • Grant, G., & Riesman, D. (1978). The perpetual dream: Reform and experiment in the American college. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Grasha, A. F. (1996). Teaching with style: A practical guide to enhancing learning by understanding teaching and learning styles. Pittsburgh, PA: Alliance.
  • Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (1998). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Group for Human Development in Higher Education. (1974). Faculty development in a time of retrenchment. New York, NY: Change Magazine Press.
  • Guskey, T. R. (2002, August). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 381–391.
  • Guterman, L. (2001, February 16). Student murdered in dormitory at Gallaudet University. The Chronicle of HigherEducation, p. A49.
  • Haag, M., Christopher, K., Cummings, J., Dickey, J., & Gilder, B. (1999). Effective methods of training biology laboratory teaching assistants. Retrieved June 17, 2006, from the University of Toronto, Department of Zoology web site: www.zoo.utoronto.ca/able/volumes/vol-21/22-haag.pdf
  • Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action (C. Lenhardt & S. W. Nicholsen, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Haghighi, K. (2005, October). Guest editorial: Quiet no longer: Birth of a new discipline. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(4), 351–353.
  • Hall, D. E. (2002). The academic self: An owner’s manual. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press.
  • Halstead, D. K. (1974). Statewide planning in higher education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Hamermesh, D. S., & Parker, A. M. (2005, August). Beauty in the classroom: Instructors’pulchritude and putative pedagogical productivity. Economics of Education Review, 24(4), 369–376.
  • Hampl, P. (1999). I could tell you stories: Sojourns in the land of memory. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
  • Hardesty, L. L. (2002, January). Future of academic/research librarians: A period of transition—to what? Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 2(1), 79–97.
  • Harkavy, I., & Puckett, J. L. (1994, September). Lessons from Hull House for the contemporary urban university. Social Science Review, 68(3), 299–321.
  • Harrington, K. (2002). The view from the elephant’s tail: Creation and implementation of post-tenure review at the University of Massachusetts. In C. M. Licata & J. C. Morreale (Eds.), Post-tenure faculty review and renewal: Experienced voices (pp. 66–79). Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
  • Harris, C., & Harvey, A. N. C. (2000). Team teaching in adult higher education classrooms: Toward collaborative knowledge construction. In M-J. Eisen & E. J. Tisdell (Eds.), New directions for adult and continuing education: No. 87. Team teaching and learning in adult education (pp. 25–32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Hatcher, J. A. (1997, June). Classroom assessment techniques: Ways to improve teaching and learning in a service learning class. Paper presented at the American Association for Higher Education Assessment Forum, Miami, FL.
  • Hatcher, J. A., & Bringle, R. G. (1997, Fall). Reflections: Bridging the gap between service and learning. Journal of College Teaching, 45(4), 153–158.
  • Hatcher, J. A., Bringle, R. G., & Muthiah, R. (2004, Fall). Designing effective reflection: What matters to service learning? Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 11(1), 38–46.
  • Hellyer, S., & Boschmann, E. (1993). Faculty development programs: A perspective. In D. L. Wright & J. P. Lunde (Eds.), To improve the academy: Vol. 12. Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (pp. 217–224). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
  • Heritage University. (2004). Heritage University catalog, 2004–2006. (2004). Toppenish, WA: Author.
  • Hewitt, J. A., Moran, B. B., & Marsh, M. E. (2003, April). Finding our replacements: One institution’s approach to recruiting academic librarians. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(2), 179–189.
  • Hollander, J. A. (2002, July). Learning to discuss: Strategies for improving the quality of class discussion. Teaching Sociology, 30(3), 317–327.
  • Holmgren, R., Mooney, K., & Reder, M. (2005, January). Transforming teaching cultures: The need for teaching and learning programs at liberal arts colleges. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of American Colleges and Universities, San Francisco, CA.
  • Holstrom, E. I., Gaddy, C. D., Van Horne, V. V., & Zimmerman, C. M. (1997). Best and brightest: Education and career paths of top science and engineering students. Washington, DC: Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology.
  • Honos-Webb, L., Sunwolf, Hart, S., & Scalise, J. T. (2006). How to help after national catastrophes: Findings following 9/11. Tire Humanistic Psychologist, 34(1), 75–97.
  • hooks, b. (1989). Talking back: Thinking feminist, thinking black. Boston, MA: South End Press.
  • hooks, b. (1994 ). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • hooks, b. (2000). Where we stand: Class matters. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • hooks, b. (2003). Teaching community: A pedagogy of hope. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • hooks, b., & West, C. (1991). Breaking bread: Insurgent black intellectual life. Boston, MA: South End Press.
  • Horkheimer, M. (1972). Critical theory: Selected essays. New York, NY: Herder and Herder.
  • Horton, M. (1990). The long haul: An autobiography. New York, NY: Doubleday.
  • Huba, M. E., Ellertson, S., Cook, M. D., & Epperson, D. (2003). Assessment’s role in transforming a grass-roots initiative into an institutionalized program: Evaluating and shaping learning communities at Iowa State University. In J. MacGregor (Ed.), Doing learning community assessment: Five campus stories (pp. 21–47). Olympia, WA: The Evergreen State College, Washington Center for Improving the Quality of Undergraduate Education.
  • Huber, M. T. (2004). Balancing acts: The scholarship of teaching and learning in academic careers. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
  • Huber, M. T., & Hutchings, P. (2005). The advancement of learning: Building the teaching commons. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Huber, M. T., & Morreale, S. P. (Eds.). (2002). Disciplinary styles in the scholarship of teaching and learning: Exploring common ground. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
  • Hurst, J. C. (1999, July/August). The Matthew Shepard tragedy: Management of a crisis. About Campus, 4(3), 5–11.
  • Hutchings, P. (2000). Introduction: Approaching the scholarship of teaching and learning. In P. Hutchings (Ed.), Opening lines: Approaches to the scholarship of teaching and learning (pp. 1–10). Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
  • Hutchings, P. (Ed.). (2002). Ethics of inquiry: Issues in the scholarship of teaching and learning. Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
  • Hutchings, P., & Shulman, L. S. (1999, September/October). The scholarship of teaching: New elaborations, new developments. Change, 31(5), 10–15.
  • Hutchings, P., & Shulman, L. S. (2004). The scholarship of teaching: New elaborations, new developments. In L. S. Shulman, Teaching as community property: Essays on higher education (pp. 145–154). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. (Original work published 1999)
  • Iannaccone, P. M., & Khokha, M. (Eds.). (1996). Fractal geometry in biological systems: An analytical approach. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Inch, S., & McVarish, J. (2003, February). Across the divide: Reflecting on university collaboration. Reflective Practice, 4(1), 3–10.
  • Israel, B. A., Schurman, S. J., & Hugentobler, M. K. (1992, March). Conducting action research: Relationships between organization members and researchers. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 28(1), 74–101.
  • Jackson, W. K., & Simpson, R. D. (1993). Refining the role of senior faculty at a research university. In M. J. Finkelstein & M. W. LaCelle-Peterson (Eds.), New directions for teaching and learning: No. 55. Developing senior faculty as teachers (pp. 69–80). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Jacobs, L. C., & Chase, C. I. (1992). Developing and using tests effectively: A guide for faculty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Jencks, C., & Riesman, D. (1968). The academic revolution. New York, NY: Doubleday.
  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Johnston, K. (2004). MSU thoughts on teaching#10: What undergraduates say are the most irritating faculty behaviors. Retrieved June 26, 2006, from the Michigan State University, Teaching Assistant Program web site: http://tap.msu.edu/PDF/thoughts/tt10.pdf
  • Kagan, S. (1992). Cooperative learning. San Juan Capistrano, CA: Kagan Cooperative Learning.
  • Kalivoda, P., Sorrell, G. R., & Simpson, R. D. (1994, Summer). Nurturing faculty vitality by matching institutional interventions with career-stage needs. Innovative Higher Education, 18(4), 255–272.
  • Karpiak, I. E. (1997). University professors at mid-life: Being a part of . . . but feeling apart. In D. DeZure & M. Kaplan (Eds.), To improve the academy: Vol. 16. Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (pp. 21–40). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
  • Karpiak, I. E. (2000, July). The “second call”: Faculty renewal and recommitment at midlife. Quality in Higher Education, 6(2), 125–134.
  • Karpiak, I. E. (2000, Spring). Writing our life: Adult learning and teaching through autobiography. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 26(l), 31–50.
  • Kellogg Commission on the Future of State and Land-Grant Universities. (1999). Returning to our roots: The engaged institution. Washington, DC: National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges.
  • Kellsey, C. (2003, June). Crisis in foreign language expertise in research libraries: How do we fill this gap? College & Research Libraries News, 64(6), 391–392, 397.
  • King, A. (1989, October). Effects of self-questioning training on college students’ comprehension of lectures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14(4), 366–381.
  • King, A. (1990, Winter). Enhancing peer interaction and learning in the classroom through reciprocal questioning. American Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 664–687.
  • King, A. (1992). Promoting active learning and collaborative learning in business administration classes. In T. J. Frecka (Ed.), Critical thinking, interactive learning, and technology: Reaching for excellence in business education (pp. 158–173). Chicago, IL: Arthur Andersen Foundation.
  • King, A. (1994). Autonomy and question asking: The role of personal control in guided student-generated questioning. Learning and Individual Differences, 6(2), 162–185.
  • King, A. (1995, Winter). Guided peer questioning: A cooperative learning approach to critical thinking. Cooperative learning and college teaching, 5(2), 15–19.
  • Klein, J. (2006). A collegiate dilemma: The lack of formal training in ethics for professors. Journal of College and Character, 2. Retrieved June 17, 2006, from www.collegevalues.org/articles.cfm?a=l&id=l416
  • Knapper, C., Wilcox, S., & Weisberg, M. (1996). Teaching students more: Discussion with more students. Ontario, Canada: Queen’s University, Instructional Development Centre.
  • Kohl, H. (2000). The discipline of hope: Learning from a lifetime of teaching. New York, NY: New Press.
  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Krogh, L. (2001, March). Action research as action learning as action research as action learning … at multiple levels in adult education. Paper presented at the 4th annual conference of the Australian Vocational Education and Training Research Association, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Kuther, T. L. (2003). A profile of the ethical professor: Student views. College Teaching, 51(4), 153–160.
  • Lamber, J., Ardizzone, T., Dworkin, T., Guskin, S. L., Olsen, D., Parnell, P., et al. (1993), A “community of scholars”: Conversations among mid-career faculty at a public research university. In D. L. Wright & J. P. Lunde (Eds.), To improve the academy: Vol. 12. Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (pp. 13–26). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
  • Lang, J. M. (2005). Life on the tenure track: Lessons from the first year. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Langseth, M., & Plater, W. M. (Eds.). (2004). Public work and the academy: An academic administrator’s guide to civic engagement and service-learning. Bolton, MA: Anker.
  • Larson, W. A. (Ed.). (1994). When crisis strikes on campus. Washington, DC: Council for Advancement and Support of Education.
  • Lazarus, R. S., & Lazarus, B. N. (1994). Passion and reason: Making sense of our emotions. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Leamnson, R. (1999). Thinking about teaching and learning: Developing habits of learning with first year college and university students. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
  • LeCompte, M. D., & Preissle, J. (1993). Ehnography and qualitative design in educational research (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • LeDoux, J. (1996). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York, NY: Touchstone.
  • Levine, A., & Cureton J. S. (1998). When hope and fear collide: A portrait of today’s college student. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Levinson, D. J., with Darrow, C. N., Klein, E. B., Levinson, M. H., & McKee, B. (1978). The seasons of a man’s life. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
  • Lewin, K. (1997). Resolving social conflicts. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. (Original work published 1948)
  • Licata, C. M., & Morreale, J. C. (1997). Post-tenure review: Policies, practices, precautions (New Pathways Working Paper Series No. 12). Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
  • Licata, C. M., & Morreale, J. C. (1999, Fall). Post-tenure review: National trends, questions and concerns. Innovative Higher Education, 24(1), 5–15.
  • Licata, C. M., & Morreale, J. C. (2002). Post-tenure faculty review and renewal: Experienced voices. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
  • Liebovitch, L. S. (1998). Fractals and chaos simplified for the life sciences. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Liverant, G. I., Hofmann, S. G., & Litz, B. T. (2004, June). Coping and anxiety in college students after the September l l th terrorist attacks. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 17(2), 127–139.
  • Loacker, G. (Ed.). (2000). Self assessment at Alverno College. Milwaukee, WI: Alverno College.
  • Lowman, J. (1996). Assignments that promote and integrate learning. In R. J. Menges, M. Weimer, & Associates, Teaching on solid ground: Using scholarship to improve practice (pp. 203–232). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Lyman, F. (198l). The responsive classroom discussion: The inclusion of all students. In A. S. Anderson (Ed.), Mainstreaming digest (pp. 109–113). College Park, MD: College of Education, University of Maryland.
  • Lynton, E. A. (1995). Making the case for professional service. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
  • MacGregor, J., & Smith, B. L. (2005, May/June). Where are learning communities now? National leaders take stock. About Campus, 10(2), 2–8.
  • Maki, P. L. (2004). Assessing for learning: Building a sustainable commitment across the institution.Sterling, VA: Stylus.
  • Mandelbrot, B. B. (1982). The fractal geometry of nature. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
  • Mangan, K. S. (2005, November 25). “Katrina” students are in every state. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A45.
  • Manouchehri, A. (1996, October). Theory and practice: Implications for mathematics teacher education programs. Paper presented at the annual forum of the Association of Independent Liberal Arts Colleges for Teacher Education, Atlanta, GA.
  • Marchese, T. J. (1997). The new conversations about learning: Insights from neuroscience and anthropology, cognitive studies, and work-place studies. In Assessing impact: Evidence and action (pp. 79–95). Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
  • Marcuse, H. (1964). One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
  • Marcuse, H. (1972). Counterrevolution and revolt. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
  • Matthews, R. S., Smith, B. L., MacGregor, J., & Gabelnick, F. (1997). Creating learning communities. In J. G. Gaff, J. L. Ratcliff, & Associates, Handbook of the undergraduate curriculam: A comprehensive guide to purposes, structures, practices, and change (pp. 457–475). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • McKeachie, W. J. (1994). McKeachie’s teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers (9th ed.). Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
  • McKeachie, W. J., & Svinicki, M. (2006). McKeachie’s teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers (12th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • McKinney, K. (2004). The scholarship of teaching and learning: Past lessons, current challenges, and future visions. In C. M. Wehlburg & S. Chadwick-Blossey (Eds.), To improve the academy: Vol. 22. Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (pp. 3–19). Bolton, MA: Anker.
  • McLaren, P. (1998). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
  • Menges, R. J. (1996). Experiences of newly hired faculty. In L. Richlin & D. DeZure (Eds.), To improve the academy: Vol. 15. Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (pp. 169–182). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
  • Menges, R. J., & Associates. (1999). Faculty in new jobs: A guide to settling in, becoming established, and building institutional support. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Michaelsen, L. K., Knight, A. B. & Fink, L. D. (Eds.). (2004). Team-based learning: A transformative use of small groups in college teaching. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
  • Michigan State University. (1996). Points of distinction: A guidebook for planning and evaluating quality outreach (Rev. ed.). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
  • Michigan State University Libraries. (2005). Hurricane Katrina: Research and resources. Retrieved June 17, 2006, from the Michigan State University Libraries web site: www.lib.msu.edu/libinstr/katrina.htm
  • Millem, J. F., Chang, M. J., & Antonio, A. L. (2005). Making diversity work on campus: A research-based perspective. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
  • Miller, J. A. (1991, May). Experiencing management: A comprehensive, “hands-on” model for the introductory undergraduate management course. Journal of Management Education, 15(2), 151–169.
  • Millet, M. S. (2005, March). Is this the ninth circle of hell? Library Journal, 130(5), 54.
  • Millet, M. S., & Posas, L. (2005). Recruitment and retention of new academic librarians in their own words: Who they are and what they want. Retrieved June 24, 2006, from the Trinity University web site: www.trinity.edu/mmillet/professional/NewLibProject.htm
  • Millis, B. J. (1994). Conducting cooperative cases. In E. C. Wadsworth (Ed.), To improve the academy: Vol. 13. Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (pp. 309–328). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
  • Millis, B. J. (2002). Enhancing learning—and more!—through cooperative learning (IDEA Paper No. 38). Retrieved June 16, 2006, from the Kansas State University, IDEA Center web site: www.idea.ksu.edu/papers/Idea_Paper_38.pdf
  • Millis, B. J. (2004). A versatile interactive focus group protocol for qualitative assessments. In C. M. Wehlburg & S. Chadwick-Blossey (Eds.), To improve the academy: Vol. 22. Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (pp. 125–141). Bolton, MA: Anker.
  • Millis, B. J., & Cottell, P. G., Jr. (1998). Cooperative learning for higher education faculty. Phoenix, AZ: American Council on Education/Oryx Press.
  • Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Montgomery, S. M., & Groat, L. N. (1998). Student learning styles and their implications for teaching (CRLT Occasional Paper No. 10). Ann Arbor, Ml: Center for Research on Learning and Teaching, University of Michigan.
  • National Research Council. (1996). The path to the Ph.D.: Measuring graduate attrition in the sciences and humanities. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Science Board. (2004). Science and engineering indicators, 2004 (NSB 04–01). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resource Statistics.
  • National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. (2003). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2002 (NSF 03–312). Arlington, VA: Author.
  • National Survey of Student Engagement. (2004). Student engagement: Pathways to collegiate success. Bloomington, IN: Center for Postsecondary Research, Indiana University Bloomington.
  • Newcomer, J. W., Selke, G., Melson, A. K., Hershey, T., Craft, S., Richards, K., et al. (1999, June). Decreased memory performance in healthy humans induced by stress-level cortisol treatment. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56(6), 527–533.
  • Nuhfer, E. B. (2003a). Content coverage, courses, and controversy part 1: Developing in fractal patterns V. National Teaching and Learning Forum, 13(1), 8–10.
  • Nuhfer, E. B. (2003b). Developing in fractal patterns I: Moving beyond diagnoses, evaluations, and fixes. National Teaching and Learning Forum, 12(2), 7–9.
  • Nuhfer, E. B. (2003c). Developing in fractal patterns II: A tour of the generator. National Teaching and Learning Forum, 12(4), 9–11.
  • Nuhfer, E. B. (2004a). Fractal thoughts on the forbidden affective in teaching evaluation and high level thinking: Educating in fractal patterns X. National Teaching and Learning Forum, 14(1), 9–11.
  • Nuhfer, E. B. (2004b). Why rubrics? Educating in fractal patterns IX. National Teaching and Learning Forrun, 13(6), 9–11.
  • Nuhfer, E. B. (2005a). DeBono’s red hat on Krathwohl’s head: Irrational means to rational ends—more fractal thoughts on the forbidden affective: Educating in fractal patterns XIII. National Teaching and Learning Forum, 14(5), 7–11.
  • Nuhfer, E. B. (2005b). A fractal thinker looks at student evaluations. Retrieved May 30, 2006, from the Idaho State University, Center for Teaching and Learning web site: www.isu.edu/ctl/facultydev/extras/MeaningEvalsfract_files/MeaningEvalsfract.htm
  • Nuhfer, E. B. (2005c). Fractal views on good testing practices: Educating in fractal patterns XII. National Teaching and Learning Forum, 14(4), 9–11.
  • Nuhfer, E. B. (2005d). Perceiving education’s temporal temperaments (part A–patterns): Educating in fractal patterns XIV. National Teaching and Learning Forum, 14(6), 7–10.
  • Nuhfer, E. B. (2005e). Perceiving education’s temporal temperaments (part B–age, order, duration, frequency, rate, and magnitude): Educating in fractal patterns XIV. National Teaching and Learning Forum, 15(1), 8–11.
  • Nuhfer, E. B. (2005f). Tests as anchors that wobble: Understanding imperfect correlations in educational measurements: Educating in fractal patterns XI. National Teaching and Learning Forum, 14(2), 8–11.
  • Nuhfer, E. B., & Adkison, S. (2003). Unit level development: Teaching philosophies at the unit level: Educating in fractal patterns IV. National Teaching and Learning Forum, 12(6), 4–7.
  • Nuhfer, E. B., Chambers, F., & Heckler. (2002, June). Teaching in fractal patterns: Recursive connections of assessment, individual faculty development, and unit level development. Paper presented at the Pacific Planning, Assessment, and Institutional Research Conference, Honolulu, HI.
  • Nuhfer, E. B., & Knipp, D. (2003). The knowledge survey: a tool for all reasons. In C. M. Wehlburg & S. Chadwick-Blossey (Eds.), To improve the academy: Vol. 21. Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (pp. 59–78). Bolton, MA: Anker. Addenda available electronically. Retrieved May 30, 2006, from the Idaho State University, Center for Teaching and Learning web site: www.isu.edu/ctl/facultydev/ADDENDUM.htm
  • Nuhfer, E. B., Krest, M., & Handelsman, M. (2003). A guide for composing teaching philosophies: Developing in fractal patterns III. National Teaching and Learning Forum, 12(5), 10–11.
  • Nuhfer, E. B., Leonard, L., & Akersten, S. (2004). Content coverage, courses, and controversy part 2: Developing in fractal patterns VI. National Teaching and Learning Forum, 13(2), 8–11.
  • Nuhfer, E. B., & Pavelich, M. (2001). Levels of thinking and educational outcomes. National Teaching and Learning Forum, 11(1), 5–8.
  • Nuhfer, E. B., & Pavelich, M. (2002). Using what we know to promote high level thinking outcomes. National Teaching and Learning Forum, 11(3), 6–8.
  • Nuhfer, E. B., & Pletsch, C. (2002, June). Educating in fractal patterns: Linking development, instruction, and assessment from the individual to unit levels. Pre-conference workshop presented at the American Association for Higher Education assessment conference, Boston, MA.
  • Nuhfer, E. B., & Pletsch, C. (2003, June). Harnessing the power of fractal thinking in education, assessment, and faculty development. Pre-conference workshop presented at the American Association for Higher Education assessment conference, Seattle, WA.
  • Nyquist, J. D., & Wulff, D. H. (1988). Consultation using a research perspective. In E. C. Wadsworth, L. Hilsen, & M. A. Shea (Eds.), A handbook for new practitioners (pp. 81–88). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
  • O’Meara, K. (2003, Fall). Believing is seeing: The influence of beliefs and expectations on post-tenure review in one state system. Review of Higher Education, 27(1), 17–43.
  • O’Meara, K. (2004, March/April). Beliefs about post-tenure review: The influence of autonomy, collegiality, career stage, and institutional context. Journal of Higher Education, 75(2), 178–202.
  • O’Meara, K. (2005). Effects of encouraging multiple forms of scholarship nationwide and across institutional types. In K. O’Meara & R. E. Rice, Faculty priorities reconsidered: Rewarding multiple forms of scholarship (pp. 255–289). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • O’Meara, K., & Rice, R. E. (2005). Faculty priorities reconsidered: Rewarding multiple forms of scholarship. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • O’Reilley, M. R. (1998). Radical presence: Teaching as contemplative practice. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
  • Otto, M. L. (1994). Mentoring: An adult developmental perspective. In M. A. Wunsch (Ed.), New directions for teaching and learning: Vol. 57. Mentoring revisited: Making an impact on individuals and institutions (pp. 15–24). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Ouellett, M. L. (Ed.). (2005). Teaching inclusively: Resources for course, department, and institutional change in higher education. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
  • Pace, D., & Middendorf, J. (Eds.). (2004). New directions for teaching and learning: No. 98. Decoding the disciplines: Helping students learn disciplinary ways of thinking. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Paine, C., & Sprague, J. (2000). Crisis prevention and response: ls your school prepared? Oregon School Study Council Bulletin, 43(2), 1.
  • Palmer, P. J. (1998). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Palmer, P. J. (2000). Let your life speak: Listening for the voice of vocation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Palmer, P. J. (2004). A hidden wholeness: The journey toward an undivided life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Pappas, C. C., Kiefer, B. Z., & Levstik, L. S. (1990). An integrated language perspective in the elementary school: Theory into action. New York, NY: Longman.
  • Parini, J. (2005, April 8). The considerable satisfaction of 2 pages a day. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. B5.
  • Park, P. (1999, June). People, knowledge, and change in participatory research. Management Learning, 30(2), 141–157.
  • Parker, W. C. (2001, March). Classroom discussion: Models for leading seminars and deliberations. Social Education, 65(2), 111–115.
  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Patrick, S. K., & Fletcher, J. J. (1998). Faculty developers as change agents: Transforming colleges and universities into learning organizations. In M. Kaplan & D. Lieberman (Eds.), To improve the academy: Vol. 17. Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (pp. 155–170). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
  • Paulsen, M. P. (2001).The relationship between research and the scholarship of teaching. In C. Kreber (Ed.), New directions for teaching and learning: No. 86. Scholarship revisited: Perspectives on the scholarship of teaching (pp. 19–29). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Pike, G. R. (1999, May/June). The effects of residential learning communities and traditional residential living arrangements on educational gains during the first year of college. Journal of College Student Development, 40(3), 269–284.
  • Pike, G. R., Schroeder, C. C., & Berry, T. R. (1997, November/December). Enhancing the educational impact of residence halls: The relationship between residential learning communities and first-year college experiences and persistence. Journal of College Student Development, 38(6), 609–621.
  • Plater, W. M. (2004, June). What recognitions and rewards should a campus create to promote civic engagement of students? Paper presented at the Wingspread Conference, Racine, WI.
  • Plater, W. M., Chism, N. V. N., & Bringle, R. G. (2005, February). Revising promotion and tenure guidelines. Panel presented at the meeting of the American Association of State Colleges and Universities, San Diego, CA.
  • Polanyi, M., & Cockburn, L. (2003, Summer). Opportunities and pitfalls of communitybased research: A case study. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 9(3), 16–25.
  • Professional and Organizational Development Network in Higher Education. (2002). Ethical guidlines for educational developers. Retrieved June 2, 2006, from http://podnetwork .org/development/ethicalguidelines.htm
  • Professional and Organizational Development Network in Higher Education. (2005). The POD Network strategic plan 2005. Retrieved June 2, 2006, from www.podnetwork .org/pdf/PODplan.pdf
  • Rasmussen, R. V. (1984). Practical discussion techniques for instructors. AACE Journal, 12(2), 38–47.
  • Ray, T. T. (1996). Differentiating the related concepts of ethics, morality, law, and justice. In Fisch (Ed.), New directions for teaching and learning: No. 66. Ethical dimensions of college and university teaching: Understanding and honoring the special relationship between teachers and students (pp. 47–54). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Reason, P. (1999, June). Integrating action and reflection through co-operative inquiry. Management Learning, 30(2), 207–226.
  • Reynolds, G., with Stevenson, K. (2003). Leading discussions: What every student (and lecturer) needs to know! Retrieved June 18, 2006, from the Staffordshire University, Department of Sociology and Crime, Deviance, and Society web site: www.staffs.ac.uk/schools/humanities_and_soc_sciences/sociology/leaddiss.htm
  • Rice, D., & Stacey, K. (1997). Small group dynamics as a catalyst for change: A faculty development model for academic service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 4, 64–71.
  • Rice, R. E. (1986, January). The academic profession in transition: Toward a new social fiction. Teaching Sociology, 14(1), 12–23.
  • Rice, R. E. (1996). Making a place for the new American scholar (New Pathways Working Paper Series No. 1). Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
  • Rice, R. E. (2005). “Scholarship Reconsidered”: History and context. In K. O’Meara & R. E. Rice, Faculty priorities reconsidered: Rewarding multiple forms of scholarship (pp. 17–31). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Rice, R. E., & Finkelstein M. J. (1993). The senior faculty: A portrait and literature review. In J. Finkelstein & M. W. LaCelle-Peterson (Eds.), New directions for teaching and learning: No. 55. Developing senior faculty as teachers (pp. 7–19). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Rice, R. E., Sorcinelli, M. D., & Austin, A. E. (2000). Heeding new voices: Academic careers for a new generation. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
  • Richlin, L. (Ed.). (1993). New directions for teaching and learning: No. 54. Preparing faculty for the new conceptions of scholarship. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Robinson, B., & Schaible, R. M. (1995, Spring). Collaborative teaching: Reaping the benefits. College Teaching, 43(2), 57–60.
  • Rodgers, M. L., & Starrett, D. A. (2005, October). Is it time to get in the game? National Teaching & Learning Forum, 14(6), 10–11.
  • Romano, J. L., Hoesing, R., O’Donovan, K., & Weinsheimer, J. (2004, April). Faculty at midcareer: A program to enhance teaching and learning. Innovative Higher Education, 29(1), 21–48.
  • Rooney, M. (2002, November 8). Student kills three University of Arizona professors. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. Al2.
  • Rose, M. (1999). Possible lives: The promise of public education in America. New York, NY: Penguin.
  • Rovinescu, O. (2005). Critical reading guide. Quebec, Canada: Concordia University, Centre for Teaching and Learning Services.
  • Sanders, D. P., & McCutcheon, G. (1986, Fall). The development of practical theories of teaching. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 2(l), 40–67.
  • Sandmann, L. R., Foster-Fishman, P. G., Lloyd, J., Rauhe, W., & Rosaen, C. (2000, January/February). Managing critical tensions: How to strengthen the scholarship component of outreach. Change, 32(l), 44–52.
  • Savin-Baden, M., & Major, C. H. (2004). Foundations of problem-based learning. London, England: Open University Press.
  • Sax, L. J., & Astin, A. W. (1997, Summer/Fall). The benefits of service: Evidence from undergraduates. Educational Record, 78(3–4), 25–32.
  • Schank, R. C. (1990). Tell me a story: Narrative and intelligence. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA; Jossey-Bass.
  • Schroeder, C. M. (2005). Evidence of the transformational dimensions of the scholarship of teaching and learning: Faculty development through the eyes of SoTL scholars. In S. Chadwick-Blossey & D. R. Robertson (Eds.), To improve the academy: Vol. 23. Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (pp. 47–71). Bolton, MA: Anker.
  • Schroeder, C. M. (2005, October). Going “meta” with SoTL: Research-based frameworks as the missing link. Paper presented at the 30th annual conference of the Professional and Organizational Development Network in Higher Education, Milwaukee, WI.
  • Schwandt, T. A. (1998). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (pp. 221–259). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Seldin, P. (1997). Using student feedback to improve teaching. In D. DeZure & M. Kaplan (Eds.), To improve the academy: Vol. 16. Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (pp. 335–345). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
  • Seldin, P. (2006). Tailoring faculty development programs to faculty career stages. In S. Chadwick-Blossey & D. R. Robertson (Eds.), To improve the academy: Vol. 24. Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (pp. 137–146). Bolton, MA: Anker.
  • Selingo, J. (2005, October 14). U.S. spends billions to encourage math and science students, but it’s unclear if programs work, report says. Retrieved June 16, 2006, from http://chronicle.com/daily/2005/10/2005101402n.htm
  • Seymour, E. (2001). Tracking the processes of change in US undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering and technology. Science Education, 86, 79–105.
  • Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Seymour, E., with Melton, G., Wiese, D. J., & Pedersen-Gallegos, L. (2005). Partners in innovation: Teaching assistants in college science courses. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Sheehy, G. (1976). Passages: Predictable crises of adult life. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
  • Shapiro, N. S., & Levine, J. H. (1999). Creating learning communities: A practical guide to winning support, organizing for change, and implementing programs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Shih, M-Y., & Sorcinelli, M. D. (2000). TEACHnology: Linking teaching and technology in faculty development. In M. Kaplan & D. Lieberman (Eds.), To improve the academy: Vol. 18. Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (pp. 151–163). Bolton, MA: Anker.
  • Shor, I. (1996). When students have power: Negotiating authority in a critical pedagogy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1987, Spring). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–21.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1999, July/August). Taking learning seriously. Change, 31(4), 10–17.
  • Shulman, L. S. (2000, April). From Minsk to Pinsk: Why a scholarship of teaching and learning? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 48–52.
  • Siegel, D. (1994). Campuses respond to violent tragedy. Phoenix, AZ: American Council on Education/Oryx Press.
  • Silver, R. C., Holman, A., McIntosh, D. N., Poulin, M., & Gil-Rivas, V. (2002, September). Nationwide longitudinal study of psychological responses to September 11. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(10), 1235–1244.
  • Simmons, S. R. (2004). “An imperishable attitude”: A memoir of learning and teaching. Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education, 33, 147–154.
  • Simpson, E. L. (1990). Faculty renewal in higher education. Malabar, FL: Krieger.
  • Small, S. A. (1995, November). Action-oriented research: Models and methods. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57(4), 941–955.
  • Smith, B. L. (1988). The Washington Center: A grass roots approach to faculty development and curricular reform. In J. G. Kurfiss (Ed.), To improve the academy: Vol. 7. Resources for student, faculty, and institutional development (pp. 165–177). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
  • Smith, B. L., MacGregor, J., Matthews, R. S., & Gabelnick, F. (2004). Learning communities: Reforming undergraduate education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Smith, D. M., & Kolb, D. A. (1986). The user’s guide for the learning-style inventory: A manual for teachers and trainers. Boston, MA: McBer.
  • Smith, K. S., & Kalivoda, P. L. (1998). Academic morphing: Teaching assistant to faculty member. In M. Kaplan & D. Lieberman (Eds.), To improve the academy: Vol. 17. Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (pp.85–101). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
  • Snooks, M. K., Neely, S. E., & Williamson, K. M. (2004). From SGID and GIFT to BBQ: Streamlining midterm student evaluation to improve teaching and learning. In C. M. Wehlburg & S. Chadwick-Blossey (Eds.), To improve the academy: Vol. 22. Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (pp. 110–124). Bolton, MA: Anker.
  • Snyder, G. (1990). The practice of the wild. San Francisco, CA: North Point Press.
  • Sorcinelli, M. D. (2000). Principles of good practice: Supporting early-career faculty. Guidance for deans, department chairs, and other academic leaders. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
  • Sorcinelli, M. D., Austin, A. E., Eddy, P. L., & Beach, A. L. (2006). Creating the future of faculty development: Learning from the past, understanding the present. Bolton, MA: Anker.
  • Stanton, T. K., Giles, D. E., Jr., & Cruz, N. I. (1999). Service-learning: A movement’s pioneers reflect on its origins, practice, and future. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Stassen, M. L. A. (2000). “It’s hard work!”: Faculty development in a program for first-year students. In M. Kaplan & D. Lieberman (Eds.), To improve the academy: Vol. 18. Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (pp. 254–277). Bolton, MA: Anker.
  • Stassen, M., & Sorcinelli, M. D. (2001, February). Making assessment matter. Advocate, 18(4), 5–8.
  • Steen, S., Bader, C., & Kubrin, C. (1999, April). Rethinking the graduate seminar. Teaching Sociology, 27(2), 167–173.
  • Stein, R. F., & Hurd, S. (2000). Using student teams in the classroom: A faculty guide. Bolton, MA: Anker.
  • Stevens, J., & Streatfeild, R. (2003). SPEC kit 276, recruitment and retention. Retrieved June 24, 2006, from www.arl.org/spec/SPEC276WebBook.pdf
  • Stevens, W. (1977). Opus posthumous (S. F. Morse, Ed.). New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
  • St. John, E. P., McKinney, J., & Tuttle, T. (in press). Using action inquiry to address critical challenges. In E. P. St. John & M. Wilkerson (Eds.), New directions for institutional research: Improving academic success: Reframing persistence research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Strand, K., Marullo, S., Cutforth, N., Stoecker, R., & Donohue, P. (2003). Community-based research and higher education: Principles and practices. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Strand, K., Marullo, S., Cutforth, N., Stoecker, R., & Donohue, P. (2003, Summer). Principles of best practice for community-based research. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 9(3), 5–15.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing ground theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Strenta, A. C., Elliot, R., Adair, R., Matier, M., & Scott, J. (1994, October). Choosing and leaving science in highly selective institutions. Research in Higher Education, 35(5), 513–547.
  • Streuling, G. F. (2004). Overcoming initial mistakes when using small groups. In L. K. Michaelsen, A. B. Knight, & L. D. Fink (Eds.), Team-based learning: A transformative use of small groups in college teaching (pp. 133–143). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
  • Stringer, E. T. (1999). Action research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Strommer, D. W. (1999). Teaching and learning in a learning community. In J. H. Levine (Ed.), Learning communities: New structures, new partnerships for learning (pp. 39–49). Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for the FirstYear Experience and Students in Transition.
  • Sugar, S. (1998). Games that teach: Experiential activities for reinforcing learning. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
  • Sugar, S. E., & Willet, C. A. (1994). The game of academic ethics: The partnering of a board game. In E. C. Wadsworth (Ed.), To improve the academy: Vol. 13. Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (pp. 121–131). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
  • Sullivan, W. M. (2005). Work and integrity: The crisis and promise of professionalism in America (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Svinicki, M. (1999). Ethics in college teaching. In W. J. McKeachie, Teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers (10th ed., pp. 289–300). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Tan, W. (2004, June). Academic librarianship: Traveling across time lines. Journal of Educational Media and Library Sciences, 41(4), 431–436.
  • Tatum, B. D. (1997). “Why are all the black kids sitting together in the cafeteria?” and other conversations about race. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Tauber, R. T. (1998). Good or bad, what teachers expect from students they generally get! Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED426985)
  • Taylor, K. L., & Toews, S. V. M. (1999, July). Effective presentations: How can we learn from the experts? Medical Teacher, 21(4), 409–414.
  • Taylor, P. (1992). Improving graduate student seminar presentations through training. Teaching of Psychology, 19(4), 236–238.
  • Theall, M., Abrami, P. C., & Mets, L. M. (Eds.). (2001). New directions for institutional research: No. 109. The student ratings debate: Are they valid? How can we best use them? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Thomas, N. (1999). The institution as a citizen: How colleges and universities enhance their civic roles (Working Paper No. 22). Boston, MA: University of Massachusetts Boston, New England Resource Center for Higher Education.
  • Tobias, S. (1990). They’re not dumb, they’re different: Stalking the second tier. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation.
  • Trout, P. A. (1997, September/October). What the numbers mean: Providing a context for numerical student evaluations of courses. Change, 29(5), 24–30.
  • Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384–399.
  • Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. C. (1977). Stages of small-group development revisited. Group and Organizational Studies, 2(4), 419–427.
  • Vogler, K. E., & Long, E. (2003, September). Team teaching two sections of the same undergraduate course: A case study. College Teaching, 51(4), 122–126.
  • Walker, C. J. (2002). Faculty well-being review: An alternative to post-tenure review? In C. M. Licata & J. C. Morreale (Eds.), Post-tenure review faculty review and renewal: Experienced voices (pp. 229–241).Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
  • Walshok, M. L. (1999). Strategies for building the infrastructure that supports the engaged campus. In R. G. Bringle, R. Games, & E. A. Malloy (Eds.), Colleges and Uiversities as citizens (pp. 74–95). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Walshok, M. L. (2004, March). It’s not just about public service: The intellectual benefits of civic engagement. Colloquium presented at Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Ward, G. (1988). I’ve got a project on … Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Ware, M. E., & Gardner, L. E. (1978, October). Team teaching introductory psychology as pedagogy and for faculty development. Teaching of Psychology, 5(3), 127–130.
  • Warren, L. (1998–99). Class in the classroom. Essays on Teaching Excellence, 10(2).
  • Wayment, H. A. (2004, April). It could have been me: Vicarious victims and disaster-focused distress. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(4), 515–528.
  • Weimer, M. (1990). Successful participation strategies. In M. Weimer & R. A. Neff (Eds.), Teaching college: Collected readings for the new instructor (pp. 95–96). Madison, WI: Magna.
  • Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Wellman, J. V. (1999). Contributing to the civic good: Assessing and accounting for the civic contributions of higher education. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.
  • Wesson, M., & Johnson, S. (1991, May/June). Post-tenure review and faculty revitalization. Academe, 77(3), 53–57.
  • West, C. (1999). Cornel West on heterosexism and transformation: An interview. In J. A. Segarra & R. Dobles (Eds.), Learning as a political act: Struggles for learning and learning from struggles (pp. 290–305). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2003, Winter). What kind of citizen? Political choices and educational goals. Campus Compact Reader, 3(3), 1–13.
  • Wheatley M. J. (1992). Leadership and the new science: Learning about organization from an orderly universe. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
  • Wheeler, D. W., & Wheeler, B. J. (1994). Mentoring faculty for midcareer issues. In M. A. Wunsch (Ed.), New directions for teaching and learning: Vol. 57. Mentoring revisited: Making an impact on individuals and institutions (pp. 91–98). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Whiting, L. R., Tucker, M., & Whaley, S. R. (2004, June). Level of preparedness for managing crisis communication on land grant campuses. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Communication Excellence in Agriculture, Natural Resources, and Life and Human Sciences, Lake Tahoe, NV.
  • Wiggins, G. (1990). The truth may make you feel free, but the test may keep you imprisoned: Toward assessment worthy of the liberal arts. AAHE Assessment Forum, 17–31.
  • Wilson, E. K. (1982, May/June). Power, pretense, and piggybacking: Some ethical issues in teaching. Journal of Higher Education, 53(3), 268–281.
  • Wirth, K. R., Perkins, D., & Nuhfer, E. B. (2005). Knowledge surveys: A tool for assessing learning, courses, and programs [Abstract]. Geological Society of America Annual Meetings Program with Abstracts, 37(7), 119.
  • Witherell, C., & Noddings, N. (Ed.). (1991). Stories lives tell: Narrative and dialogue in education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Worsfold, V. L. (2002). A workshop on the ethics of teaching. In W. Davis, J. Smith, & R. Smith (Eds.), Ready to teach: Graduate teaching assistants prepare for today and for tomorrow (pp. 41–46). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
  • Wright, B. (200l). Accreditation where credit is due. In L. Suskie (Ed.), Assessment to promote deep learning: Insight from AAHE’s 2000 and 1999 assessment conferences (pp. 49–58). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
  • Wright, J. C., Millar, S. B., Koscuik, S. A., Penberthy, D. L., Williams, P. H., & Wampold, B. E. (1998, August). A novel strategy for assessing the effects of curriculum reform on student competence. Journal of Chemical Education, 75(8), 986–992.
  • Wright, W. A. (Ed.). (1995). Teaching improvement practices: Successful strategies for higher education. Bolton, MA: Anker.
  • Wright, W. A., & O’Neill, W. M. (1995). Teaching improvement practices: International perspectives. In W. A. Wright & Associates, Teaching improvement practices: Successful strategies for higher education (pp. 1–57). Bolton, MA: Anker.
  • Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (2003). Women in science: Career processes and outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Yeats, W. B. (1940). The second coming. In P. Allt & R. K. Alspach (Eds.), The variorum edition of the poems of W. B. Yeats (pp. 823–825). New York, NY: Macmillan. (Original work published 1921)
  • Yoder, M. K. (1997, Fall). The consequences of a generic approach to teaching nursing in a multicultural world. Journal of Cultural Diversity, 4(3), 77–82.
  • Zlotkowski, E. (2000, Fall). Service-learning in the disciplines. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning [Special issue], 61–67.
  • Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1992). Action research in higher education: Examples and reflections. London, England: Kogan Page.
  • Zuelke, D. C., & Nichols, T. M. (1995, November). Collaborative school climate action research for school improvement: Part II. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Education Research Association, Biloxi, MS.
  • Zull, J. E. (2002). The art of changing the brain: Enriching the practice of teaching by exploring the biology of learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.