New York Mining Law. [Volume: 8, Issue: 1, 1888, pp. 13-15]

Journal of the United States association of charcoal iron workers.

No, 1.] CHARCOAL IRON WORKERS. 13 the general manager of the Chateaugay Ore and Iron Company, is certainly deserving of praise for his energy in attempting the solution of a problem, which had cost others so much money and had at that time produced such unsatisfactory results. To our mind, the question to be determined, is how lean the material which is taken from the mine can be successfully treated in the separators; as this lean ore is sorted from the shipping lump ore, it goes either to the dump or to the separators; it has been paid for in mining, and, therefore, the only cost to make it valuable is the expense of separation. We, however, do not consider, that in the present state of our knowledge we have yet found a wet method of concentration which will compensate an owner to work a mine which furnishes lean ore only; for the present, jigs must be confined to utilizing the ore which is taken out with shipping ore from mines now worked. We acknowledge the courtesy of the use of the cuts in this article, to Dr. R. W. Raymond, Secretary of the American Institute of Mining Engineers.-EDITOR. New York Mining Law. In the transactions of the American Institute of Mining Engineers, Vol. XVII, Dr. R. W. Raymond, Secretary, discusses the Mining Law of New York, as contained in Title XI, Chapter IX., Part One. of the Revised Statutes, and claims that enlightened statesmanship should abolish the whole of it, and give all mineral deposits, out and out, to the owner of the land. In his interpretation of the New York Mining Law, Mr. Raymond; says: "The word mine is evidently used throughout in the sense of a mineral deposit upon which a mine may be opened. The distinction between mines and quarries or diggings, is not recognized. "The first three sections apparently assume the sovereign right of the State to all mines of whatever metals or metallic ores within its borders, and proceed to divide this property of the State into two classes, one of which is bestowed upon the private land-owner, and the other reserved to the State. In the first class are put practically copper, tin, iron, and lead mines only, and not even


No, 1.] CHARCOAL IRON WORKERS. 13 the general manager of the Chateaugay Ore and Iron Company, is certainly deserving of praise for his energy in attempting the solution of a problem, which had cost others so much money and had at that time produced such unsatisfactory results. To our mind, the question to be determined, is how lean the material which is taken from the mine can be successfully treated in the separators; as this lean ore is sorted from the shipping lump ore, it goes either to the dump or to the separators; it has been paid for in mining, and, therefore, the only cost to make it valuable is the expense of separation. We, however, do not consider, that in the present state of our knowledge we have yet found a wet method of concentration which will compensate an owner to work a mine which furnishes lean ore only; for the present, jigs must be confined to utilizing the ore which is taken out with shipping ore from mines now worked. We acknowledge the courtesy of the use of the cuts in this article, to Dr. R. W. Raymond, Secretary of the American Institute of Mining Engineers.-EDITOR. New York Mining Law. In the transactions of the American Institute of Mining Engineers, Vol. XVII, Dr. R. W. Raymond, Secretary, discusses the Mining Law of New York, as contained in Title XI, Chapter IX., Part One. of the Revised Statutes, and claims that enlightened statesmanship should abolish the whole of it, and give all mineral deposits, out and out, to the owner of the land. In his interpretation of the New York Mining Law, Mr. Raymond; says: "The word mine is evidently used throughout in the sense of a mineral deposit upon which a mine may be opened. The distinction between mines and quarries or diggings, is not recognized. "The first three sections apparently assume the sovereign right of the State to all mines of whatever metals or metallic ores within its borders, and proceed to divide this property of the State into two classes, one of which is bestowed upon the private land-owner, and the other reserved to the State. In the first class are put practically copper, tin, iron, and lead mines only, and not even

/ 412
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 13-22 Image - Page 13 Plain Text - Page 13

About this Item

Title
New York Mining Law. [Volume: 8, Issue: 1, 1888, pp. 13-15]
Author
Raymond, R.W., Dr.
Canvas
Page 13
Serial
Journal of the United States association of charcoal iron workers.
Publication Date
1888
Subject terms
Iron industry and trade -- Societies.
Periodicals

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/ahj4772.0001.008
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/ahj4772.0001.008/31:5

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:ahj4772.0001.008

Cite this Item

Full citation
"New York Mining Law. [Volume: 8, Issue: 1, 1888, pp. 13-15]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/ahj4772.0001.008. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 21, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.