A Sketch of Philosophy [pp. 126-132]

The Ladies' repository: a monthly periodical, devoted to literature, arts, and religion. / Volume 4, Issue 2

THE LADIES' REPOSITORY. than eight years, and afterward at the head of an academy in Athens. But instead of carrying philosophy into the streets, as his master had done, he lived entirely wvithldrawn firom the public, satisfied in influencing his pupils. Amiong his earliest works are dialogues that treat of Socratic questions and themes in a Socratic way. All his reasoning was as subyective as that of his great model. He says: "The cause of all impurity and irreligioni amiong men is that reversing in themselves the relative subordination of mind and body; they have, in like manner, in the universe made that to be first whichl is second, and that second which is first; for, while in the generation of all things, intelligence and final causes precede matter and efficient causes, they, on the contralry, have viewed matter and material things as absolutely prior in the order of existence to intelligence and design; and thus departing firom an original error in regard to themselves, they have ended in the subversion of the Godhead." The Platonic system (Socrates obljectified) may be divided into three parts,logic, ethics, and physics. The order which they should take he has not declared. He had some Pythagorean doctrines, such as the pre-existence and trainsmigration of souls, the conception of love, etc. He tried to prove the iimmortality of the soul, but he did not convince even himself, and recognized the great truth, iinowv so apparent, that this question does not belong to the province of reasoning, and calls for a special revelation. As Plato was the only true Socratist, so Aristotle was the only genuine disciple of Plato. He was born 384 B. C., and stands out for the most parit as a thoughtful observer. Kant has remarked that since the time of this Grecian sage, logic has made no progress. He devised the syllogismi and 1was the father of modern psychology. The great difference bletwveen Aristotle and his predecessors is, that they began with any principles whatever, perhaps inmaginaiy, and he began the sciences only with established facts. And though, as Draper says, "Conflict between Science and Religion," this latter system "implies endless toil in the collection of facts, both by experiment and observation, and implies also a close meditation of them," the grandest of results has been reached. Plato devoted himself to the higher faculties of the mind; Aristotle analyzed those faculties that were more nearly related to the senses. Draper compares Plato's philosophy to a gorgeous castle in the air, while Aristotle's is a solid structure, laboriously founded on a rock. Aristotle's method was induction, and he was the founder of a new school, differing from the Platonic in that while the latter holds a dualism of material objects and mental ideas, the former is of the opinion that phenomena, whether material or spiritual, are in the things themselves and not behind them. "While the Scientific school of Alexandria was founded on the maxims of one great Athl)enian philosopher, the Ethical school was founded on another, for Zeno, though a Cypr-iote or Phlcenician, had for many years been establishled in Athens. His disciples took the name of Stoics. His aim was to ftlrnishl a guide for the daily practice of life, to make men virtuous. He insists thllt education is the true foundation of vii-tule, for if we know what is good, we shall incline to do it." Zeno, with:l his stern commands to control the passions, to -reg-ulate life by reason, and sul)bmit to the law of necessity, is still the type of the highest teachings of science unaided by religion, and he was no more successful than are the moralists of to-day. In the intellectual decline of Alexandria, indolent methods were preferred to those necessitating laborious observation, and alluring imagination was oftener followed than severe reason. -Ieo-oplatonisiz is the last great product of Greek Philosophy. It had for its object pantheistic eclecticism; it endeavored to ally the philosophy of Aristotle and Plato to the theosophy of the Orient, and tended to mysticism and theurgy, or an I28 [August,

/ 98
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 127-136 Image - Page 128 Plain Text - Page 128

About this Item

Title
A Sketch of Philosophy [pp. 126-132]
Author
Wilbur, Emma G.
Canvas
Page 128
Serial
The Ladies' repository: a monthly periodical, devoted to literature, arts, and religion. / Volume 4, Issue 2

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acg2248.3-04.002
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acg2248.3-04.002/138:7

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acg2248.3-04.002

Cite this Item

Full citation
"A Sketch of Philosophy [pp. 126-132]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acg2248.3-04.002. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 23, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.