PHILOSOPHY OF MODERN INFIDELITY. He laid his patriarchal hand upon his head! Yes, and I would rather have felt that hand pressing my head, than to have felt the weight of the precarious crown of empire. I would rather have the charac ter of old Mr. Faithful, than all that the Rothschilds possess, and all that Louis Philippe ever lost. The wealth of the former, by the revolutions of time, may take wings and fly away; the latter, by a revo lution, lost his crown: but old Mr. Faithful has a treasure that time cannot affect, and a crown that will never fade away, reserved in heaven for him. And, in the course of nature, he will soon be there to enjoy them for ever. Peace to his ashes when he is gone! And let this epitaph be inscribed upon his tomb, TO THE MEMORY OF MR. FAITHFUL. His name was indicative of his character in all the relations of life. Who will emulate his virtues? I cannot better conclude this article than by the following quotation: "In the nmorning sow thy seed, and in the evening withhold not thy hand; for thou knowest not whether shall prosper, either this or that, or whether they both shall be alike good." PHILOSOPHY OF MODERN INFIDELITY. BY ]EDWARD C.'MERwRICK. "THE fool hath said in his heart, There is no God." To this climax of folly the human mind has arrived only after a long progression in sin, a hopeless bewilderment in the mazes of error, and a total enslavement of the heart to its own corruptions. Long did the remnants of its former purity, the yet unobscured traces of the image of God, contend with the spirit of evil and the gathering strength of carnal corruption, ere man's guardian angel took his despairing flight, and left him to sink into this awful chaos. The immediate descendants of Adam, when, in the pride and rebellion of their hearts, they revolted from their allegiance to God, had not arrived at such a degree of impiety as to deny his existence. They degraded that existence to the level of their own sensual imaginations, and substituted for his worship a most debasing adoration of the works of their own hands, or of the perishing and filthy reptiles of earth. Though the carnal mind is enmity against God, it required a fearful development of its corruptions to enable it to acknowledge, even to its own consciousness, that the end of all its desires was to strike the Deity from existence, and to range the sea of licentiousness, unawed by fears of retribution. It required the cultivated depravity of more enlightened ages to cut loose from all obligation to Divine authority, to strike at every principle of social stability, and to turn men loose, as a herd of wild beasts, to prey upon each other till the whole race should perish from the earth. Heathenism in the classic ages had its disbelievers. But they contented themselves with a mere withdrawal of credence from a system of monstrous superstitions, which popular ignorance and priestly cunning had dignified with the name of religion. There was nothing in the classic mythology to excite their fears of retribution for crimes of which the very gods were guilty: there was no standard of moral excellence with which to contrast their own vileness of heart, and thus destroy their lofty selfappreciation. It was not their interest to attack a system of superstition which imposed upon the brutish mass restraints necessary to society. This negative opposition was tolerated even by a pampered priesthood as perfectly harmless to their privileges and emoluments. How strangely does this contrast with the unsparing warfare which infidelity has waged against Christianity in every stage of its existence! Nor can we fail to account for this hostility upon universally admitted principles of human nature. The Christian system characterizes the human heart as deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked. It represents man, even in the exercise of his boasted virtues, and in his most exalted character, as a rebel against his Creator, as totally depraved in heart and life, and as the dupe of an abominable pride. It exhibits corruption in his loftiest efforts, and exposes his littleness in the presence of the great "I AM." It poisons his most delicious moments of sinful enjoyment by the threatenings of the awful future. It wages an uncompromising war upon the cherished silns of his heart, and points to the narrow path of self-denial as the only way to an immortality of blessedness. Proud, misguided spirits, revolted from the humiliation of confession and repentance. The purity of God's holy law, reflected in the lives of humble Christians, darkly contrasted with their corruption of heart and life. The rewards of humble obedience, present peace and eternal blessedness, sickened their hearts with envy, as they compared these themes of high and holy consolation with their own miserable lot of unsatisfactory indulgence, sated appetites, and blighted hopes, with all the unalleviated ills of the present, and the dreadful anticipations of the future. With devilish malignity they endeavored to cut off from all mankind the hopes and consolations which they could not enjoy without sacrificing their dearest idols. They hoped to alleviate their own misery by contemplating that of the whole hutnan race. They aimed to sap the foundation of the Christian's faith, "And with infernal chemistry to wring The last sweet drop from sorrow's bitter cup of gall." Such is modern infidelity. Men educated in the principles of the Bible, have, with black ingratitude, turned their knowledge and intellectual discipline 359
Philosophy of Modern Infidelity [pp. 359-361]
The Ladies' repository: a monthly periodical, devoted to literature, arts, and religion. / Volume 8, Issue 12
PHILOSOPHY OF MODERN INFIDELITY. He laid his patriarchal hand upon his head! Yes, and I would rather have felt that hand pressing my head, than to have felt the weight of the precarious crown of empire. I would rather have the charac ter of old Mr. Faithful, than all that the Rothschilds possess, and all that Louis Philippe ever lost. The wealth of the former, by the revolutions of time, may take wings and fly away; the latter, by a revo lution, lost his crown: but old Mr. Faithful has a treasure that time cannot affect, and a crown that will never fade away, reserved in heaven for him. And, in the course of nature, he will soon be there to enjoy them for ever. Peace to his ashes when he is gone! And let this epitaph be inscribed upon his tomb, TO THE MEMORY OF MR. FAITHFUL. His name was indicative of his character in all the relations of life. Who will emulate his virtues? I cannot better conclude this article than by the following quotation: "In the nmorning sow thy seed, and in the evening withhold not thy hand; for thou knowest not whether shall prosper, either this or that, or whether they both shall be alike good." PHILOSOPHY OF MODERN INFIDELITY. BY ]EDWARD C.'MERwRICK. "THE fool hath said in his heart, There is no God." To this climax of folly the human mind has arrived only after a long progression in sin, a hopeless bewilderment in the mazes of error, and a total enslavement of the heart to its own corruptions. Long did the remnants of its former purity, the yet unobscured traces of the image of God, contend with the spirit of evil and the gathering strength of carnal corruption, ere man's guardian angel took his despairing flight, and left him to sink into this awful chaos. The immediate descendants of Adam, when, in the pride and rebellion of their hearts, they revolted from their allegiance to God, had not arrived at such a degree of impiety as to deny his existence. They degraded that existence to the level of their own sensual imaginations, and substituted for his worship a most debasing adoration of the works of their own hands, or of the perishing and filthy reptiles of earth. Though the carnal mind is enmity against God, it required a fearful development of its corruptions to enable it to acknowledge, even to its own consciousness, that the end of all its desires was to strike the Deity from existence, and to range the sea of licentiousness, unawed by fears of retribution. It required the cultivated depravity of more enlightened ages to cut loose from all obligation to Divine authority, to strike at every principle of social stability, and to turn men loose, as a herd of wild beasts, to prey upon each other till the whole race should perish from the earth. Heathenism in the classic ages had its disbelievers. But they contented themselves with a mere withdrawal of credence from a system of monstrous superstitions, which popular ignorance and priestly cunning had dignified with the name of religion. There was nothing in the classic mythology to excite their fears of retribution for crimes of which the very gods were guilty: there was no standard of moral excellence with which to contrast their own vileness of heart, and thus destroy their lofty selfappreciation. It was not their interest to attack a system of superstition which imposed upon the brutish mass restraints necessary to society. This negative opposition was tolerated even by a pampered priesthood as perfectly harmless to their privileges and emoluments. How strangely does this contrast with the unsparing warfare which infidelity has waged against Christianity in every stage of its existence! Nor can we fail to account for this hostility upon universally admitted principles of human nature. The Christian system characterizes the human heart as deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked. It represents man, even in the exercise of his boasted virtues, and in his most exalted character, as a rebel against his Creator, as totally depraved in heart and life, and as the dupe of an abominable pride. It exhibits corruption in his loftiest efforts, and exposes his littleness in the presence of the great "I AM." It poisons his most delicious moments of sinful enjoyment by the threatenings of the awful future. It wages an uncompromising war upon the cherished silns of his heart, and points to the narrow path of self-denial as the only way to an immortality of blessedness. Proud, misguided spirits, revolted from the humiliation of confession and repentance. The purity of God's holy law, reflected in the lives of humble Christians, darkly contrasted with their corruption of heart and life. The rewards of humble obedience, present peace and eternal blessedness, sickened their hearts with envy, as they compared these themes of high and holy consolation with their own miserable lot of unsatisfactory indulgence, sated appetites, and blighted hopes, with all the unalleviated ills of the present, and the dreadful anticipations of the future. With devilish malignity they endeavored to cut off from all mankind the hopes and consolations which they could not enjoy without sacrificing their dearest idols. They hoped to alleviate their own misery by contemplating that of the whole hutnan race. They aimed to sap the foundation of the Christian's faith, "And with infernal chemistry to wring The last sweet drop from sorrow's bitter cup of gall." Such is modern infidelity. Men educated in the principles of the Bible, have, with black ingratitude, turned their knowledge and intellectual discipline 359
About this Item
- Title
- Philosophy of Modern Infidelity [pp. 359-361]
- Author
- Merrick, Edward C.
- Canvas
- Page 359
- Serial
- The Ladies' repository: a monthly periodical, devoted to literature, arts, and religion. / Volume 8, Issue 12
Technical Details
- Collection
- Making of America Journal Articles
- Link to this Item
-
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acg2248.1-08.012
- Link to this scan
-
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acg2248.1-08.012/389
Rights and Permissions
The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].
DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States
Related Links
IIIF
- Manifest
-
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acg2248.1-08.012
Cite this Item
- Full citation
-
"Philosophy of Modern Infidelity [pp. 359-361]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acg2248.1-08.012. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 24, 2025.