Causes of Aristocracy [pp. 551-566]

Debow's review, Agricultural, commercial, industrial progress and resources. / Volume 28, Issue 5

CAUSES OiF ARISTOCRACY. tocracy is born of the masses, and as it is but the development of the intellect of the talented of the masses in the various pursuits of life, it should not be sneered at by their representatives. All aristocrats are upstarts, if the satirist's views are correct, but genius and energy made them so; and Pope, with his dirty habits and great pretensions, aping of the great, was a greater snob, according to this theory, than Cromwell. The million must always be rough, and, to a considerable degree, ignorant. Toil, and want of time to cultivate the graces of mind and body, makes them so. They, therefore, resign the study of art, science, literature, fashion, to those who have genius, wealth, leisure, or opportunity; while they build our ships and temples, and fight our battles under the instruction of the higher class, and bide the time when they, too, may join the throng of elegant idlers. It is vain for satire to storm; it cannot level the high, nor raise the low. Its endeavors are vain, and its aims false. We, therefore, cannot sanction this fierce declamation against the upper society. A little reflection will convince the most obtuse that it is wholly unjust. Men are not snobs because they are wealthy, and should not be censured because they show an ambition to put on good manners, and live genteelly. The snob and parvenu originated in the same feeling that made the old regime envy the wealth and splendor of Napoleon's court. They stalked through the Tuileries the shadows of their former greatness, and sneered at the Bonapartes as the creatures of a military upstart; but now these princes are no longer upstarts, but the arbitrators of Europe. Are they any better? It is well not to sink our charity in envy. The republic protects the highest and the humblest in the enjoyment of his earnings; and it is hardly just for him, whom idleness, extravagance, or misfortunes have kept poor, to ridicule those who have toiled for their comforts with honesty and prudence. Conceit makes each one consider his own style of living the most genteel, and it therefore becomes a virtue, because it makes us contented with our lot. The poor satirize the mechanic for waste and fashion; they, the middle class; they, the aristocracy; and these the high society of kings, showing how relative a thing is envy, and how universal, conceit. In our censures of those above us, we forget their ostentation is for our, as well as their benefit. One of the greatest means of relieving the necessities of a laboring population, and one of the principal stimulants of industry and invention, and of 655

/ 120
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 555-564 Image - Page 555 Plain Text - Page 555

About this Item

Title
Causes of Aristocracy [pp. 551-566]
Author
Wiswall, J. T.
Canvas
Page 555
Serial
Debow's review, Agricultural, commercial, industrial progress and resources. / Volume 28, Issue 5

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acg1336.1-28.005
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acg1336.1-28.005/559:6

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acg1336.1-28.005

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Causes of Aristocracy [pp. 551-566]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acg1336.1-28.005. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 21, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.