Anti-National Phases of the State Government [pp. 85-102]

The Princeton review. / Volume 1, 1882

ANT~-NA TIONAL PHASES OF STA TE GOVERNMENT. 93 jurious with every step of our progress. At the foundation of the government the people of the several States were really separated in policy and interests; the States had just emerged from the condition of colonies, and were but partially amalgamated. The colonies had led each a separate existence, somewhat aloof from one another and holding toward each other an attitude of jealousy and suspicion. New York and Connecticut had been traditionally at open feud; the existence of Rhode Island had been a kind of standing protest against what was there deemed the illiberal policy and bigotry of Massachusetts; New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Maryland had had little in common in their origin or in their colonial history, and the Southern colonies were at variance with the Northern in their political governments and in the prevailing sentiments of their people. Facilities for intercourse between the colonies were mneagre, and instances of social commingling or of business connection between their inhabitants were of comparatively rare occurrence. The common desire for independence from the British crown, and the sympathies and mutual interests developed by their union in the Revolutionary struggle, constituted the bond that drewr the colonies together into national unity. When independence was finally achieved the new States retained much of the colonial exclusiveness, and shrank from anything more than a very qualified merger of themselves in a national government. The articles of confederation served rather to foster the jealousy of the States than to knit them together in closer union. And when the Constitution was framed, consolidating the States more firmly, and depriving them of some of the elements of sovereignty, it was not received with universal enthusiasm; it was only after years of reluctance and under the pressure of obvious policy that the Constitution was finally accepted by all the States. These sharp lines of demarcation between the States have by the progress of time become nearly obliterated in the interests and temper of the people, while legally they remain as at first. It admits of no doubt whatever that the population of the United States is vastly more homogeneous and more truly national in spirit than it was in its beginnings. This is probably true even of the Southern States, for the past few years give

/ 364
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 87-96 Image - Page 93 Plain Text - Page 93

About this Item

Title
Anti-National Phases of the State Government [pp. 85-102]
Author
Smith, Eugene
Canvas
Page 93
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 1, 1882

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.009
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.3-01.009/97:7

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.3-01.009

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Anti-National Phases of the State Government [pp. 85-102]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.009. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 23, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.