Anti-National Phases of the State Government [pp. 85-102]

The Princeton review. / Volume 1, 1882

ANTI-NATIONAL PEIASES OF STATE GOVERNMENT. 9I absolute divorce was rendered in her favor in I874, and in the following year she married one C. H. Murray. After the entry of the judgment of divorce Baker also contracted a second marriage, marrying one Eunice Nelson within the State of New York. He was then indicted in New York for bigamy; he pleaded in defence that the divorce in Ohio having terminated his first marriage, left him free to marry Eunice Nelson. It was conceded that the judgment in Ohio was regularly obtained in accordance with the laws of that State, and that it was unquestionably valid in Ohio; but, on the ground that the defendant was domiciled and actually resident in New York, and did not appear by attorney in the divorce suit, the Court of Appeals held that the divorce was not binding on Baker or on the courts of New York; the divorce was held valid as to the wife, Sallie West, but a nullity as to the husband, Frank M. Baker; by virtue of it the wife became divorced from her husband, but the husband did not become divorced from his wife; Frank M. Baker continued to be the husband of Sallie West when he married Eunice Nelson,- and hence he was guilty of bigamy, and was sentenced to the State Prison for five years, and there he probably is to-day. The anomalies involved in this decision are very striking. If Sallie West, now Mrs. Murray, should move with her husband, Mr. C. H. Murray, to New York, she would have two husbands here no, the subject demands the utmost exactness of language she would have only one husband, but two husbands would have her as their lawful wife. Mr. Baker has never been deprived of her, altho Mr. Baker is to her no relation, for she was divorced but he was not. Sallie, having been legally divorced, had a right to marry Mr. Murray, was legally married to him in Ohio, and the validity of Mr. Murray's claim to her must be recognized even by the courts of New York. Regard the matter now from Mr. Baker's standpoint: Suppose that he had married Eunice Nelson in Rhode Island instead of New York, and had gone to Ohio upon his wedding tour; the courts of Rhode Island accept the Ohio divorce as valid, and Eunice and her husband consequently set out on their journey a legally married couple; in crossing the State of New York Eunice ceases to hold any lawful relation to her hus band, whose New York wife is Sallie West; and, on reaching

/ 364
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 87-96 Image - Page 91 Plain Text - Page 91

About this Item

Title
Anti-National Phases of the State Government [pp. 85-102]
Author
Smith, Eugene
Canvas
Page 91
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 1, 1882

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.009
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.3-01.009/95:7

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.3-01.009

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Anti-National Phases of the State Government [pp. 85-102]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.009. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 24, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.