Right and Wrong in Politics [pp. 265-293]

The Princeton review. / Volume 1, 1882

THE PRINCETON RE VIEW. answered that the state occupies in the constitution of the world a position suigeneris, and to which there is nothing which presents any exact resemblance or analogy. So far as our knowledge extends, it is in the life of the state, and only there, that human life, in all its ramifications, can obtain the nourishment it needs for its appropriate expansion and development. This is equally true, indeed, of the family, and we believe it to be true of some still higher and less materially constituted society which, amidst all the limitless interpretations which have been placed upon the name, still retains for Christians the profoundest significance-that is, the Church. Each of these organizations has an essential contribution to make to the perfection of human society and to the perfection of individual life in that society. Both lay claim to the devout allegiance, within proper limits, of the persons who compose it; and each, on the other hand, owes to those persons the maintenance of its own peculiar character and the faithful discharge of its tutelary duties. It is thus that the largest-minded heathen philosophers, such as Aristotle and Cicero, discerned that in a life of public activity on behalf of the state something more was concerned than the accomplishment of narrow personal aspirations. In the same way, even with all the refinements of modern ethical criticism, it is intuitively felt that the self-seeking of such men as Henry VIII. of England, Frederick the Great of Prussia, and even of Napoleon Bonaparte, has to be submitted to a very different, tho perhaps not more indulgent, ordeal from that which is applicable to ordinary men acting in a more circumscribed area. The root of this feeling is, no doubt, a true consciousness that the mere contact with state affairs, and the lively apprehension it carries with it of the innumerable and lasting interests which the conduct of a single man affects, has of itself a sobering influence, which, by dwarfing into insignificance all mere personal cravings, forces even the most narrow minds into a certain largeness of action which suggests a dominant sense of accountability to something other and better than a temporary and vacillating public opinion The faults of this moral inquisition as applied in the pagan world were due in a large degree to the constitution of the preChristian states, in which a slave population vastly exceeded in 272

/ 364
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 267-276 Image - Page 272 Plain Text - Page 272

About this Item

Title
Right and Wrong in Politics [pp. 265-293]
Author
Amos, Sheldon
Canvas
Page 272
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 1, 1882

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.009
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.3-01.009/276:16

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.3-01.009

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Right and Wrong in Politics [pp. 265-293]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.009. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 21, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.