American Agriculture [pp. 249-264]

The Princeton review. / Volume 1, 1882

THE PRINCETON RE VIEW. had become lazy, worthless, and vicious. Perhaps we shall find that the poor whites have been suppressed rather than degraded, and that beneath the hunting-fishing-lounging habit which slavery generated and maintained lies a native shrewdness almost passing Yankee wit, an indomitable pluck, such as has made the fights of Sharpsburg, Fredericksburg, and Gettysburg memorable forever in the history of mankind, and an energy which, when turned from horse-races, street-fights, cocking mains, hunting and fishing, to breaking up the ground, felling the forest, running the mill, exploiting the mine, and driving trade, may yet realize all the possibilities of that fair land. Third. To ascertain what are the adaptations of any piece of ground to the cultivation of any single crop, and what variety and order of crops will best bring out the capabilities of soil and climate in the production of wealth, may seem a simple thing, but it is not. It is so far from being a simple thing that a race of men, not barbarous, but, as we call them, civilized, may inhabit a region for an indefinite period and this thing not be done at all. Such may be the lack of enterprise, such the force of tradition, that crops may be cultivated from generation to generation, and from century to century, while yet the question has never been fairly determined whether the agriculture of the dis trict might not advantageously be reinforced, and the soil be relieved, by the introduction of new crops, or even by throwing out the traditionary crops altogether. Gonzales in his "Tour of England" (I730) wrote: "And my tutor told me that a good author of their own made this remark of Wiltshire,'that an ox left to himself would, of all England, choose to live in the north of this county, a sheep in the south part of it, and a man in the middle of both, as partaking of the pleasure of the plain and the plenty of the deep country.'" The remark does not exaggerate the nicety of those distinctions which determine the range of the profitable cultivation whether of an animal or a vegetable species. A certain rough canvass of the agricultural capabilities of any district is easily made, and a process of elimination early takes place by which certain crops are discarded, for once and for all, as hopeless. But among the great variety of crops which may be cultivated in any region, justly to discriminate between the good and the very good, and 254

/ 364
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 247-256 Image - Page 254 Plain Text - Page 254

About this Item

Title
American Agriculture [pp. 249-264]
Author
Walker, Francis A.
Canvas
Page 254
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 1, 1882

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.009
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.3-01.009/258:15

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.3-01.009

Cite this Item

Full citation
"American Agriculture [pp. 249-264]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.009. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 20, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.