Patronage Monopoly and the Pendleton Bill [pp. 185-207]

The Princeton review. / Volume 1, 1882

THE PRIVNCE TON RE VIEW. have brought into the public service not only men and women of more efficiency, but those of better administrative capacity, who by promotion have filled the higher places. They in no way depend upon a tenure of good behavior, nor did they originate such a tenure. It had existed nearly a century. On the contrary, competitive examinations are all the more needed where the term is short and the tenure precarious. If the officer is to serve a long time, though he enters ignorant, he may learn and become skilful. But if he is to go out in four years or sooner, there is the greater need of high capacity when he enters. If service were to be but for a month, to know how to do the work at beginning would be essential. In order to give harmony to the action of examining boards and to secure a right of appeal against their injustice, a general supervising body-known in England as "The Civil Service Commission"-was essential, and was created in I855. Its activity and growth in popularity and usefulness have steadily increased to this hour. It has corrected the abuses of local examiners and given harmony to the whole system. Its annual reports, showing the practical workings of the system, have educated the British people in those principles of justice on which their civil administration is now based. The cost of administration has been greatly diminished. No party leader now thinks of calling the new system in question. Patronage monopoly has ceased. Members of Parliament can no longer dictate either appointments or removals. There is hardly more politics in a British post-office or custom-house than in a college. There are no political assessments. Officials are not partisan henchmen. Removals are for cause. The son of a duke equally with the son of a cartman must gain a place through the same free, open competition of merit. The appointments are made from the highest in merit thus shown. Popular education has been thus stimulated beyond all example. The government appears as the friend of education, its offices and salaries falling to those most capable-to those upon whose character the rivalry of competition can find no stain. The powerfully backed henchmen, flunkies, and parasites are generally distanced by the independent volunteers who compete. Pushing and bullying are abandoned as useless. Mr. 202 I

/ 364
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 197-206 Image - Page 202 Plain Text - Page 202

About this Item

Title
Patronage Monopoly and the Pendleton Bill [pp. 185-207]
Author
Eaton, Dorman B.
Canvas
Page 202
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 1, 1882

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.009
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.3-01.009/206:12

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.3-01.009

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Patronage Monopoly and the Pendleton Bill [pp. 185-207]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.009. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 21, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.