Patronage Monopoly and the Pendleton Bill [pp. 185-207]

The Princeton review. / Volume 1, 1882

THE PRIJNCE TO.N RE VIE W. to open the examinations, and hence the gates of office, to all persons of apparent capacity, regardless of politics, influence, and all the labels and threats of the monopolists. The way must be made open, free, and clear for all, on the same terms, to prove, if they could, that they were the most worthy to hold office. In the language of Mr. Gladstone, "the public service must be made public." The monopoly would be destroyed by restoring to the people the common opportunities of which the monopolists had deprived them. Somne examinations in Great Britain had, in a small way, been opened to all by heads of bureaus in mere self-defence, as ,early I think as I850. The superior officers which such exanlinations secured were manifest from the beginning. The labelled favorites of the monopolists-the superannuated stewards, the electioneering henchmen, the muddle-headed cousins and flunkies of members of Parliament, lords, bishops, and great politicians, which made up a majority of them-were easily distanced by the young men of courage, character, and capacity who, for the first time, could offer themselves for examination. The monopolists became ashamed of the disgraceful record of their favorites. Public opinion on the part of the intelligent, untitled citizens soon began to be strong,-as it is now growing strong with us, in favor of free, open examinations,-for these fivefold reasons: (I) that they were founded in justice; (2) that they crushed an odious monopoly; (3) that they give better officers for the people; (4) that they opened a free way to office for their sons; (5) that they powerfully stimulated popular education. As soon as the examinations were made open and free, it was as easy as it was natural to examine many together, so that their merits could be compared and the best of all applicants could be selected. To refuse to ascertain and take the best, from those seeking places through examinations, would have been to repudiate the principles and records on which all examinations are based. The middle and lower classes rejoiced as much as the monopolists and aristocrats grumbled at these triumphs of justice and intelligence over birthright and monopoly. It is but just, however, to say that true statesmen among the nobility aided this republican reform -a more disinterested patriotism and a higher courage than have yet been shown by

/ 364
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 197-206 Image - Page 200 Plain Text - Page 200

About this Item

Title
Patronage Monopoly and the Pendleton Bill [pp. 185-207]
Author
Eaton, Dorman B.
Canvas
Page 200
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 1, 1882

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.009
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.3-01.009/204:12

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.3-01.009

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Patronage Monopoly and the Pendleton Bill [pp. 185-207]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.009. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 21, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.