Patronage Monopoly and the Pendleton Bill [pp. 185-207]

The Princeton review. / Volume 1, 1882

THE PRINCE TOV REVIEW. welfare of the people are equally disregarded. The men most pushed by the monopolists are very generally, at least, those who have been most servile, who have done the most question — able work, who give promise of being most useful in the future to the great lords of Monopoly. As a rule, under the spoils system, those only are considered for places who come with the approval of these monopoly lords: "I am his highness' dog at Kew; Pray tell me, sir, whose dog are you?" It is this discrimination in favor of servility, this barrier against independent thought and manly self-respect, which have caused so many in the lower offices to be submissive workers and cringing assessment-payers, and so many in the higher to be arrogant manipulators and domineering chieftains If a subordinate place is to be filled in a city government, where that system prevails, it is not the mayor or head of the office who can fill it, but some ward politician some lesser Tweed-a part of whose monopoly it is. If a vacancy exists, or is to be made, in a custom-house or a department, not the collector or the head of that department, but a Senator, Representative, or some other patronage potentate, to whose share of monopoly that place has fallen, or who has won it in the grand competition of influence, fills it-fills it from his long roll of followers as a feudal lord would give spoils won in battle. It is these monopolists who are the inveterate and natural enemies of civilservice reform, and especially of competitive examinations, which would allow them no more prizes. They profess to act in the interest of their party, but they would be little less hostile to competitive examinations open only to all the members of their party. The monopolist excludes all but his followers. With a few exceptions, every subordinate-municipal, State, and Federal alike, where the spoils system prevails-is apportioned among the great and little chiefs of patronage. Whenever a prize falls to one of them, a fierce competition of intrigue and influence among his vassals takes place. I can conceive of nothing behind the curtains of party politics that would be more interesting than a disclosure of this apportionment with the long train of growling or whining followers of every great I94

/ 364
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 187-196 Image - Page 194 Plain Text - Page 194

About this Item

Title
Patronage Monopoly and the Pendleton Bill [pp. 185-207]
Author
Eaton, Dorman B.
Canvas
Page 194
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 1, 1882

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.009
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.3-01.009/198:12

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.3-01.009

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Patronage Monopoly and the Pendleton Bill [pp. 185-207]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.009. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 22, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.