Patronage Monopoly and the Pendleton Bill [pp. 185-207]

The Princeton review. / Volume 1, 1882

THE PRINCE TON RE VIEW. loubtful whether, eighteen months ago, a single member of Congress would have been willing to raise his voice for an effective bill in aid of Civil Service reform. Now we may expect several of the foremost of either party to speak for such a measure. To the strength which the intrinsic justice of a cause commands from an intelligent people there is now being added that which comes from numbers and speaks in formidable petitions. Reform associations are at work at thirty or more of the centres of political activity. Young politicians even are considering which side of a reform policy will be strongest where a few years hence they will want votes. There may be zigzags, but the line of progress is to be ascending. When the popularity of Mr. James-due solely to business ability and reform methods, which gave the people of New York a better postal service than they had ever imaginedmade him Postmaster-General and enabled him to drive out the public plunderers, all candid, thoughtful minds recognized a new and higher power in our politics. And when his report, as Postmaster-General, declared his sense of the great need of enforcing in the postal service generally the same competitive examinations which had been so salutary at the New York office, there was a profound regret that so great a reform was checked and so invaluable an administrator was lost. With whatever delight the old chiefs and spoilsmen saw a new collector go into the New York Custom-House-for no apparent good cause, I must think-they too began to appreciate that new power when they found the abominated competitive examinations were still enforced, and that not a place was open to a mere henchman, flunky, or factionist. All the more was that hew power manifest to everybody when the Chamber of Commerce of the city of New York, with the applause of its best citizenship and its best journals, sent a formal delegation to the new collector, requesting him, in the interest of commerce, to stand by the reform; and he promised to do so. That promise he has kept, if indeed he is not a convert to the merit system he enforces. Turning from the work of education, let us consider what legislation will be most useful and what practical methods it should provide for. x86

/ 364
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 177-186 Image - Page 186 Plain Text - Page 186

About this Item

Title
Patronage Monopoly and the Pendleton Bill [pp. 185-207]
Author
Eaton, Dorman B.
Canvas
Page 186
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 1, 1882

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.009
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.3-01.009/190:12

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.3-01.009

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Patronage Monopoly and the Pendleton Bill [pp. 185-207]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.009. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 20, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.