The Private Ownership of Land [pp. 125-147]

The Princeton review. / Volume 1, 1882

THER PRZNCE TO RE VIE VW. On the other hand, laborers will feel the stimulus to industry and frugality. The unmarried will cease to accept the lot of their fathers who have gone before them, and aspire to a higher destiny, and defer marriage till they can own their own cottage and the plot of ground on which it stands. A new element of hope will be infused into the life of the whole agricultural population. It seems to us that nothing can be more obvious than that the statesmen of Europe and the world must come to this as the only foundation on which it is possible to rear a social structure which can stand the shocks of political agitation and defy the corrosion of time. We as Americans have no other reason for more profound gratitude to God for his goodness to our country than for the fact that American society is built on this impregnable foundation. It is high time that all agrarians and social levellers should at length learn (what they have by no means begun to learn as yet) that what they really want for the remedy of the evils against which they are accustomed so eloquently to inveigh is, not the abolition of the private ownership of land, but its universal establishment as the fundamental law of all civilized society. The crushing weight under which civilization is groaning is not the private ownership of land, but the absolute want of it in, most other countries except our own. The English monopoly of land is for the want of full and complete ownership in the present holder. If the present holder could sell his land at his option, and if his creditor could seize and sell it for the payment of debt, the English land monopoly would be at an end, and English society would be placed on a new line of progress for all the future. It is quite true that if the laborer is hindered by the laws, and by immemorial custom co-operating with the laws, from becoming the owner of land, he will inevitably sink to a condition but little removed from that of slavery; but if the ownership of land is subjected to all the conditions and liabilities which are involved in the possession of any other kind of property, the private ownership of land has no more tendency to enslave or degrade the laborer than the exclusive proprietorship of any other species of property. What has just been said of England may be said, mutatis mutandis, of most other countries of the world. They are agitated by an ardent passion for I46

/ 364
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 137-146 Image - Page 146 Plain Text - Page 146

About this Item

Title
The Private Ownership of Land [pp. 125-147]
Author
Sturtevant, J. M.
Canvas
Page 146
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 1, 1882

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.009
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.3-01.009/150:9

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.3-01.009

Cite this Item

Full citation
"The Private Ownership of Land [pp. 125-147]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.009. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 23, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.