The Private Ownership of Land [pp. 125-147]

The Princeton review. / Volume 1, 1882

THE PRIVA TE OWNERSHIP OF LAND. It is also a truth which, tho it has been for the most part quite overlooked in the discussion of this subject, is yet of essential importance, that, whatever may be true in rare and altogether exceptional cases, the general rule certainly is, that he who expends upon land the labor necessary to bring it into cultivation never does receive in the form of rent an amount sufficient to reimburse him for his original investment with current interest, together with what he is afterwards compelled to expend in repairs and additional improvements. In respect to those vast tracts of land which have been reclaimed from the wilderness within the last century, it is easy to demonstrate this by figures. For the illustration of the principle let us suppose that one of two capitalists had in the year I825, in the fertile prairie region of Illinois, lent to a farmer at the then current rate of interest the sum of $I6oo, to be employed by him in procuring from the government a farm of I6o acres, and preparing it for cultivation; and that he had kept his money, both interest accrued and principal at interest, for fifty years, or till the year I875; receiving of course the rates of interest which were from time to time current. Let us also suppose that at the same time another capitalist had himself bought of the government a farm of I6o acres of equally fertile land, and in the purchase and in preparing it for cultivation invested the same sum of $I6oo, and had rented his farm at the highest cash rates which the market would allow, till the same year I875; and that he had availed himself of current rates of interest for investing his rents as fast as they were received. Which of these two men would be found at the end of fifty years to have made the most profitable investment? Enough is known of the successive changes which have taken place in rents, rates of interest, and prices of land since I825 to enable us to answer this question with a very near approximation to accuracy. Probably few lands in the world have required a less outlay to prepare them for cultivation than the rich prairie lands of Illinois. It is perfectly easy to show, by facts which are known with absolute certainty, that in that State two experiments conducted in the manner suggested in the preceding paragraph would have resulted immensely in favor of the money-lender rather than of the land-owner. In, I35

/ 364
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 127-136 Image - Page 135 Plain Text - Page 135

About this Item

Title
The Private Ownership of Land [pp. 125-147]
Author
Sturtevant, J. M.
Canvas
Page 135
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 1, 1882

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.009
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.3-01.009/139:9

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.3-01.009

Cite this Item

Full citation
"The Private Ownership of Land [pp. 125-147]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.009. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 21, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.