The Private Ownership of Land [pp. 125-147]

The Princeton review. / Volume 1, 1882

THE PRINCE TON RE VIE W. or the wild grass, digs the soil, and plants it with the seeds of those trees and plants which yield food for the sustenance of man. He also surrounds it with a fence for necessary pro — tection of his crop, and builds upon it a permanent dwelling. He found this piece of land in a condition in which it could con — tribute nothing to his support; he has converted it into a most efficient means of procuring sustenance for himself and those dependent on him. On the same principle therefore upon which he who made the bow and arrows owns them, this man owns the land which he has rendered serviceable to human uses. If it is objected to this that the productive power of the land is the free gift of God to all, the answer is, so were the natural qualities of the hickory withe and the strong bark of which the bow and string were made the free gift of the Creator to all, as truly as the productive powers of the land. One of these: men has converted the natural qualities of the wood and the bark-to the use of man; the other has done the same thing for the natural powers of the soil. Each has therefore equally become the owner of that upon which he has wrought. The same law covers both cases. The same law embraces the relation of all material substances to the labor of man. It may perhaps be objected to the application of this law to land, that while other products of human industry wear out, land lasts forever, and therefore the ownership is perpetual. It is. difficult to see how this could invalidate the argument, if it were true; but it is not true. Land once brought under cultivation will soon wear out, just like any other product of human industry, unless it is renewed by timely repairs. There are probablymillions of acres even in our comparatively young country which, by the neglect of such repairs, were long ago worn out and abandoned, so that it would be far more difficult to bring them again into productiveness than it was originally to subdue them. All land is much like Rev. Sidney Smith's carriage which he called "The Immortal," because it had been repaired till nothing of the original structure remained, and by a continuance of the, same treatment it would last forever. It would have been hard indeed if some leveller of the time had declared that the reverend gentleman was for that reason no longer the owner, and deprived him of it. In the common speech of the new settle I28

/ 364
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 127-136 Image - Page 128 Plain Text - Page 128

About this Item

Title
The Private Ownership of Land [pp. 125-147]
Author
Sturtevant, J. M.
Canvas
Page 128
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 1, 1882

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.009
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.3-01.009/132:9

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.3-01.009

Cite this Item

Full citation
"The Private Ownership of Land [pp. 125-147]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.009. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 20, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.